Leave a Comment / Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% / By

Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

Organic waste management is the process of handling and disposing of organic waste in a way that minimizes its negative impact on the environment. Organic waste is any material that is biodegradable and comes from either plants or animals. Common examples of organic waste include:  

  • Food waste: scraps from fruits, vegetables, meat, and dairy products
  • Yard waste: grass clippings, leaves, branches, and other plant debris
  • Paper waste: cardboard, newspaper, and other paper products
  • Animal manure: waste from livestock and other animals

Organic waste can be a valuable resource if it is managed properly. It can be composted and used as fertilizer, or it can be used to generate energy through anaerobic digestion. However, if organic waste is not managed properly, it can create a number of environmental problems, including:

  • Greenhouse gas emissions: Organic waste that decomposes in landfills produces methane, a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change.  
  • Water pollution: Organic waste can contaminate water sources with harmful bacteria and other pollutants.
  • Air pollution: Burning organic waste can release harmful pollutants into the air.

There are a number of different ways to manage organic waste. The best approach will vary depending on the type of waste, the amount of waste, and the resources available. Some common methods of organic waste management include:

  • Composting: Composting is the process of breaking down organic waste into a nutrient-rich soil amendment. Compost can be used to improve soil fertility and reduce the need for chemical fertilizers.
  • Anaerobic digestion: Anaerobic digestion is the process of breaking down organic waste in the absence of oxygen. This process produces biogas, which can be used to generate energy.
  • Landfill diversion: Landfill diversion is the process of keeping organic waste out of landfills. This can be done through composting, anaerobic digestion, or other methods.

The numbers 75% and 95% that you mentioned could refer to different things in the context of organic waste management. Here are a few possibilities:

  • Diversion rates: Some municipalities or businesses may have goals to divert 75% or 95% of their organic waste from landfills.
  • Composting efficiency: The composting process can vary in efficiency, and some methods may be able to break down 75% or 95% of the organic waste.
  • Anaerobic digestion efficiency: Similarly, anaerobic digestion systems may be able to convert 75% or 95% of the organic waste into biogas.

Without more context, it is difficult to say for sure what the numbers 75% and 95% refer to. However, it is clear that organic waste management is an important issue, and there are a number of different ways to manage organic waste in a sustainable way.Sources and related content

What is Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

The percentages 75% and 95% in the context of organic waste management can refer to a few different things:

  • Diversion rates: Some municipalities or businesses may have goals to divert 75% or 95% of their organic waste from landfills. This means that they aim to process that percentage of their organic waste through methods like composting or anaerobic digestion instead of sending it to landfills.
  • Composting efficiency: The composting process can vary in efficiency, and some methods may be able to break down 75% or 95% of the organic waste. This means that a higher percentage indicates a more efficient composting process, resulting in less waste and more compost.
  • Anaerobic digestion efficiency: Similarly, anaerobic digestion systems may be able to convert 75% or 95% of the organic waste into biogas. This means that a higher percentage indicates a more efficient anaerobic digestion process, resulting in more biogas production and less waste.

It’s important to note that these percentages can vary depending on various factors, such as the type of organic waste, the technology used, and the scale of the operation.

For example, some cities have set ambitious goals to divert a high percentage of organic waste from landfills. San Francisco, for instance, has a goal of zero waste by 2020, which includes diverting 75% of organic waste from landfills. Similarly, some composting facilities may achieve high efficiency rates by using advanced technologies and optimizing the composting process.

Overall, the percentages 75% and 95% in organic waste management indicate a focus on reducing waste, maximizing resource recovery, and promoting sustainable practices.

Who is required Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

The requirement for organic waste management with specific targets like 75% or 95% can apply to various entities, depending on local regulations and initiatives. Here are some examples:

  • Municipalities and cities: Many cities have set ambitious goals for waste diversion and reduction, including specific targets for organic waste. For instance, San Francisco aims for zero waste by diverting 75% of organic waste from landfills.
  • Businesses: Some businesses, especially those in the food industry or those generating significant amounts of organic waste, may be required to implement organic waste management programs. This could include restaurants, grocery stores, hotels, and food processing facilities.
  • Institutions: Schools, universities, hospitals, and other institutions may also be subject to regulations or guidelines regarding organic waste management.
  • Residential areas: In some regions, homeowners or residential communities may be encouraged or even required to participate in organic waste diversion programs, such as composting or curbside collection of organic waste.
  • Events and venues: Large events or venues that generate substantial amounts of organic waste may need to have specific waste management plans in place, including targets for organic waste diversion.

The specific requirements and targets for organic waste management can vary depending on the location, type of entity, and applicable regulations. It’s important to check local regulations and guidelines to determine the specific requirements for your situation.

In general, the trend is towards increasing emphasis on organic waste management and setting higher targets for diversion and reduction. This is driven by the need to reduce environmental impact, conserve resources, and promote sustainable practices.

When is required Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

While there isn’t a universal “when” for requiring 75% or 95% organic waste management, here’s a breakdown of factors influencing it:

  • Location:
    • Progressive regions: Cities or countries with strong environmental policies often have stricter mandates. California, for example, has ambitious organic waste reduction goals.
    • Developing regions: May have less stringent immediate targets but are increasingly adopting strategies as awareness grows.
  • Waste type:
    • Municipal: Residential and commercial waste is a common target, with deadlines often set for phased implementation.
    • Industrial: Food processing or agricultural waste may have specific regulations due to volume or potential hazards.
  • Timeline:
    • Immediate: Some regulations may already be in effect, especially for large waste generators.
    • Future: Many regions have targets set for the coming years, with deadlines for compliance.
  • Enforcement:
    • Mandatory: Regulations with legal consequences for non-compliance drive adoption.
    • Incentivized: Programs offering rewards or support for organic waste management encourage participation.

To find the “when” for your specific situation:

  1. Check local regulations: Your city or municipality’s environmental department will have the most accurate information.
  2. Research industry-specific rules: If you’re in a sector like food service, look for guidelines related to your waste.
  3. Stay informed: Environmental policies evolve, so keep up-to-date on changes that may affect you.

COURTESY : PIB India

Where is required Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

The requirement for organic waste management with 75% or 95% diversion targets isn’t tied to a single “where.” It’s more about a growing global trend, though some places are leading the charge. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Pioneering Regions:
    • California (USA): Has some of the most ambitious organic waste diversion goals in the US, with mandates in place.
    • San Francisco (USA): A city known for its commitment to zero waste, with specific targets for organic waste.
    • European Union: The EU has directives promoting waste reduction and organic waste management, influencing member states.
    • Some Canadian cities: Are adopting aggressive waste diversion targets, including for organics.
  • National/Regional Trends:
    • Developed nations: Generally have more advanced waste management infrastructure and regulations, with increasing focus on organic waste.
    • Developing nations: While often lacking the same infrastructure, many are starting to prioritize organic waste management due to growing environmental awareness and the potential for resource recovery.
  • Specific Sectors:
    • Food industry: Restaurants, grocery stores, and food processing facilities are often targeted due to the large volumes of organic waste they generate.
    • Large institutions: Universities, hospitals, and other large campuses may have specific requirements.
  • It’s not just about location:
    • Regulations vary: Even within a country, requirements can differ significantly between cities or regions.
    • Focus on implementation: Having a target is one thing, enforcement is another. Some places may have ambitious goals but lack the infrastructure or mechanisms to achieve them.

To find the “where” that applies to you:

  1. Local regulations are key: Your city or municipality’s waste management department is the best source of information.
  2. State/Provincial/National guidelines: These can provide a broader framework, but local rules often have the most specific requirements.
  3. Industry-specific regulations: If you’re in a sector like food service, research any specific rules that apply to your industry.

How is required Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

The “how” of requiring organic waste management at 75% or 95% levels involves a mix of policy, infrastructure, and public engagement. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Policy and Regulation:

  • Mandates and Targets: Governments set specific targets for organic waste diversion, often with phased implementation timelines. These can be mandatory for certain sectors or municipalities.
  • Bans and Restrictions: Regulations may ban or restrict the disposal of certain organic materials in landfills, forcing alternative handling.
  • Incentives and Funding: Governments may offer grants, subsidies, or tax breaks to support the development of composting facilities, anaerobic digesters, or other organic waste processing infrastructure.
  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Policies may hold producers responsible for the end-of-life management of their products, including organic waste generated from food packaging or other materials.

2. Infrastructure and Systems:

  • Collection Programs: Curbside collection of organic waste (e.g., green bins) is essential for residential and commercial participation.
  • Processing Facilities: Composting facilities, anaerobic digesters, and other infrastructure are needed to handle the collected organic waste and convert it into useful products like compost or biogas.
  • Waste Tracking and Reporting: Systems for tracking the amount of organic waste collected and processed are crucial for measuring progress towards targets and ensuring accountability.

3. Public Engagement and Education:

  • Awareness Campaigns: Educating the public about the importance of organic waste diversion and how to properly sort and handle organic materials is essential.
  • Community Outreach: Programs that engage residents and businesses in organic waste reduction and composting initiatives can increase participation rates.
  • Support and Resources: Providing resources like composting guides, workshops, and information on local collection programs can help people implement organic waste management practices.

4. Enforcement and Monitoring:

  • Compliance Monitoring: Regular inspections and audits can ensure that businesses and institutions are complying with organic waste management regulations.
  • Penalties and Fines: Penalties for non-compliance can deter improper disposal of organic waste and encourage participation in diversion programs.

5. Technological Solutions:

  • Composting Technologies: Various composting technologies, from simple backyard systems to large-scale industrial facilities, can efficiently process organic waste.
  • Anaerobic Digestion: This technology converts organic waste into biogas, a renewable energy source, and digestate, a nutrient-rich material that can be used as fertilizer.
  • Other Innovations: Ongoing research and development are leading to new and improved methods for organic waste management, such as bio-conversion and other advanced technologies.

It’s important to note that the specific “how” will vary depending on the context, including the location, type of organic waste, and available resources. A comprehensive and integrated approach that combines policy, infrastructure, public engagement, and technology is essential for achieving high diversion targets like 75% or 95%.

Case study is Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

Let’s explore a hypothetical case study demonstrating how a region might approach organic waste management targets of 75% and eventually 95%. Since achieving 95% is extremely ambitious, this will be a long-term vision.

Case Study: Eco-City Metropolis

Phase 1: Foundation (Current – 5 years)

  • Current Situation: Eco-City Metropolis has a growing population and a traditional waste management system reliant on landfills. Organic waste makes up a significant portion of their waste stream. Current diversion is estimated at 20% through limited backyard composting and some commercial initiatives.
  • Goal: Achieve 50% organic waste diversion within 5 years.
  • Strategies:
    • Mandated Curbside Collection: Implement a city-wide green bin program for residential and commercial organic waste.
    • Composting Facility Development: Build a large-scale composting facility capable of processing the collected organic waste.
    • Public Awareness Campaign: Launch an extensive campaign to educate residents and businesses about the new program and the importance of organic waste diversion.
    • Incentive Programs: Offer composting bins at subsidized rates and recognize businesses that actively participate in the program.

Phase 2: Expansion and Optimization (5-10 years)

  • Goal: Achieve 75% organic waste diversion.
  • Strategies:
    • Anaerobic Digestion: Introduce anaerobic digestion facilities to process a portion of the organic waste, generating biogas for energy production.
    • Commercial Partnerships: Work with grocery stores, restaurants, and food processing facilities to implement customized organic waste management solutions.
    • Community Composting Programs: Support and expand community composting initiatives, providing training and resources to residents.
    • Refinement of Collection System: Optimize collection routes and schedules to improve efficiency.

Phase 3: Towards Zero Waste (10+ years)

  • Goal: Achieve 95% organic waste diversion and move towards a zero-waste model.
  • Strategies:
    • Advanced Technologies: Explore and implement advanced organic waste processing technologies, such as bio-conversion or other innovative solutions.
    • Waste Reduction Initiatives: Focus on reducing food waste at the source through public awareness campaigns and partnerships with food retailers and restaurants.
    • Circular Economy Approach: Develop a circular economy model for organic waste, ensuring that all materials are reused or repurposed.
    • Continuous Improvement: Continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the organic waste management system, making adjustments as needed.

Key Success Factors:

  • Strong Political Will: Commitment from city leaders and policymakers is essential for driving the implementation of the program.
  • Public Participation: Active engagement from residents and businesses is crucial for the success of the program.
  • Technological Innovation: Investing in and adopting advanced technologies is necessary for achieving high diversion rates.
  • Effective Enforcement: Monitoring and enforcement of regulations are important for ensuring compliance.

Challenges:

  • Funding: Securing funding for infrastructure development and program implementation can be challenging.
  • Contamination: Contamination of organic waste with non-compostable materials can hinder the composting process.
  • Public Resistance: Overcoming public resistance to new programs and changes in waste management practices can be difficult.

Note: This is a hypothetical case study. Real-world scenarios will vary depending on local conditions, resources, and political priorities. Reaching 95% organic waste diversion is a very ambitious goal and will likely require significant effort and innovation over many years.

COURTESY : Burrtec Waste

White paper on Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

White Paper: Achieving Ambitious Organic Waste Diversion Targets: 75% and Beyond

Executive Summary:

Organic waste constitutes a significant portion of municipal solid waste, contributing to landfill burden, greenhouse gas emissions, and environmental pollution. This white paper explores the challenges and opportunities associated with achieving ambitious organic waste diversion targets of 75% and ultimately striving towards 95%. It examines best practices, technological solutions, policy frameworks, and public engagement strategies necessary for successful implementation. While 75% diversion is attainable with concerted effort, reaching 95% represents a significant challenge requiring innovative approaches and a long-term commitment.

1. The Imperative for Organic Waste Management:

  • Environmental Impact: Landfilling organic waste generates methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and contributes to leachate, polluting soil and water.
  • Resource Depletion: Organic waste represents valuable resources that can be transformed into compost, biogas, and other beneficial products.
  • Economic Benefits: Effective organic waste management can create jobs, reduce waste disposal costs, and generate revenue from recovered resources.

2. Setting Ambitious Targets: 75% and 95%:

  • 75% Diversion: This target is achievable with existing technologies and well-established best practices, including curbside collection, composting, and anaerobic digestion.
  • 95% Diversion: This aspirational target requires significant innovation, behavioral change, and a holistic approach encompassing waste prevention, source reduction, and advanced processing technologies.

3. Strategies for Achieving 75% Diversion:

  • Curbside Collection Programs: Implementing comprehensive green bin programs for residential and commercial organic waste is crucial.
  • Composting Facilities: Investing in well-managed composting facilities capable of handling large volumes of organic waste is essential.
  • Anaerobic Digestion: Utilizing anaerobic digestion to process organic waste and generate biogas offers both waste management and renewable energy benefits.
  • Public Education and Outreach: Raising awareness about the importance of organic waste diversion and providing clear instructions on proper sorting and handling are critical.
  • Commercial Partnerships: Collaborating with businesses in the food sector to implement tailored organic waste management solutions is vital.

4. The Path to 95% Diversion: Overcoming the Challenges:

  • Waste Prevention and Source Reduction: Minimizing food waste through consumer education, efficient food handling practices, and food donation programs is paramount.
  • Advanced Processing Technologies: Exploring and implementing advanced technologies such as bio-conversion, enzymatic hydrolysis, and other innovative solutions will be necessary for processing difficult-to-manage organic waste streams.
  • Circular Economy Models: Adopting a circular economy approach that emphasizes reuse, recycling, and resource recovery is essential.
  • Behavioral Change: Achieving 95% diversion requires significant behavioral change from both individuals and businesses, necessitating sustained public engagement and awareness campaigns.
  • Policy and Regulatory Frameworks: Strong policy support, including mandates, incentives, and regulations, is crucial for driving progress towards ambitious targets.

5. Case Studies and Best Practices:

  • San Francisco: A global leader in zero waste initiatives, demonstrating the effectiveness of comprehensive organic waste management programs.
  • Other Leading Cities: Examining successful programs in other cities can provide valuable insights and best practices.

6. Key Considerations:

  • Contamination Control: Minimizing contamination of organic waste streams with non-compostable materials is essential for efficient processing.
  • Infrastructure Development: Investing in the necessary infrastructure, including collection systems, processing facilities, and transportation networks, is crucial.
  • Financial Sustainability: Developing sustainable funding models for organic waste management programs is essential for long-term success.

7. Conclusion:

Achieving 75% organic waste diversion is a realistic and achievable goal with existing technologies and strategies. However, reaching 95% requires a paradigm shift, embracing innovation, behavioral change, and a long-term commitment to a circular economy model. By combining policy support, infrastructure development, public engagement, and technological advancements, communities can effectively manage organic waste, minimize environmental impact, and create a more sustainable future.

8. Recommendations:

  • Develop comprehensive organic waste management plans with clear targets and timelines.
  • Invest in infrastructure and processing technologies.
  • Implement robust public education and outreach programs.
  • Foster collaboration between government, businesses, and communities.
  • Continuously monitor and evaluate program effectiveness.
  • Support research and development of advanced organic waste processing technologies.

This white paper serves as a starting point for discussions and action on organic waste management. Continued research, innovation, and collaboration will be essential for achieving ambitious diversion targets and creating a truly sustainable future.

Industrial application of Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

You’re asking about how industries can apply organic waste management to achieve those high diversion targets. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Source Reduction & Waste Prevention:

  • Process Optimization: Industries can analyze their production processes to identify areas where organic waste generation can be minimized. This might involve:
    • Improving ingredient utilization in food processing
    • Reducing trimming waste in manufacturing
    • Implementing just-in-time inventory to prevent spoilage
  • Product Design: Designing products with less packaging or using compostable/biodegradable materials can reduce organic waste at the consumer level.
  • Food Donation: Partnering with food banks or charities to donate surplus food instead of discarding it.

2. On-site Processing:

  • Composting: Industries with significant yard waste (landscaping companies, tree care services) or food waste (food processors) can compost on-site. This reduces transportation costs and creates valuable compost for use or sale.
  • Anaerobic Digestion: Larger facilities can set up anaerobic digesters to process organic waste, generating biogas for energy and digestate for fertilizer. This is particularly relevant for:
    • Food processing plants
    • Agricultural operations (manure management)
    • Wineries or breweries (spent grains, grape pomace)

3. Collaboration & Partnerships:

  • Waste Exchanges: Industries can collaborate to exchange organic waste streams. For example, a food processor’s waste could be used as animal feed by a nearby farm.
  • Centralized Processing: Joining forces with other businesses or municipalities to support the development of centralized composting or anaerobic digestion facilities. This allows for economies of scale and shared costs.
  • Supply Chain Engagement: Working with suppliers to reduce organic waste in packaging or transportation, and with retailers to implement take-back programs for organic waste.

4. Technology & Innovation:

  • Advanced Composting: Utilizing technologies like in-vessel composting or aerated static pile composting for faster and more efficient processing.
  • Pre-processing: Employing techniques like mechanical separation or enzymatic hydrolysis to break down complex organic waste and improve processing efficiency.
  • Emerging Technologies: Staying informed about and adopting new technologies like:
    • Bio-conversion (using microbes to convert waste into fuels or chemicals)
    • Black soldier fly larvae composting (for protein production and waste reduction)

5. Monitoring & Optimization:

  • Waste Audits: Regularly assessing the types and amounts of organic waste generated to identify areas for improvement.
  • Data Tracking: Implementing systems to track organic waste diversion rates and measure progress towards targets.
  • Continuous Improvement: Adapting strategies and technologies based on data analysis and best practices to maximize diversion rates.

Examples:

  • Food Industry: A large food processing plant could install an anaerobic digester to process food scraps, generating biogas to power its operations and reducing disposal costs.
  • Agriculture: A dairy farm can use an anaerobic digester to manage manure, producing biogas for electricity and digestate for fertilizer, improving farm sustainability and reducing odor.
  • Retail: A grocery store chain can implement a composting program for spoiled produce and bakery waste, partnering with a local composting facility to process the materials.

By implementing these strategies, industries can significantly contribute to achieving ambitious organic waste diversion targets, reducing environmental impact and creating valuable resources from what was once considered waste.

Research and development of Organic Waste Management 75%, 95% ?

You’re interested in the cutting edge of organic waste management! Here’s a look at the research and development happening to push those diversion rates to 75% and beyond:

1. Advanced Processing Technologies:

  • Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Optimization:
    • Increased Efficiency: Research focuses on improving biogas yields and reducing processing time in AD systems. This includes optimizing microbial communities, temperature, and reactor design.
    • Digestate Utilization: Finding valuable applications for digestate (the byproduct of AD) beyond fertilizer, such as soil amendments or even bioplastics.
  • Composting Enhancements:
    • Faster Composting: Developing methods to accelerate the composting process while maintaining compost quality. This could involve using specific microbial inoculants or optimizing aeration.
    • Compost Quality: Research on tailoring compost properties to specific applications (e.g., different types of plants or soil conditions).
  • Bio-conversion:
    • Insect-based Systems: Using insects like black soldier fly larvae to break down organic waste and produce protein-rich animal feed and frass (insect manure) for fertilizer.
    • Microbial Conversion: Employing specific microbes to convert organic waste into biofuels, bioplastics, or other valuable chemicals.
  • Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC):
    • Waste to Fuel: This process uses heat and pressure to convert organic waste into a coal-like material that can be used as a biofuel or soil amendment.

2. Waste Prevention and Source Reduction:

  • Food Waste Reduction:
    • Consumer Behavior: Research on understanding and influencing consumer behavior to reduce food waste at the household level.
    • Supply Chain Optimization: Developing strategies to minimize food waste in production, processing, and retail.
    • Food Donation and Rescue: Improving systems for collecting and redistributing surplus food to those in need.
  • Compostable Materials:
    • Biodegradable Plastics: Research on developing truly biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics for packaging and other applications.
    • Sustainable Packaging: Designing packaging that minimizes waste and is made from renewable or recycled materials.

3. Smart Technologies and Data Analytics:

  • Waste Tracking and Monitoring:
    • IoT Sensors: Using sensors to monitor fill levels in bins, optimize collection routes, and track organic waste flow throughout the system.
    • Data Analytics: Analyzing data to identify trends, optimize processing parameters, and improve overall system efficiency.
  • Smart Bins:
    • Automated Sorting: Developing bins that can automatically sort organic waste from other materials, reducing contamination and improving processing efficiency.
    • Incentive Programs: Using smart bins to track individual waste generation and provide incentives for reducing organic waste.

4. Policy and Social Sciences:

  • Behavioral Economics: Research on how to design policies and programs that effectively encourage individuals and businesses to participate in organic waste diversion programs.
  • Social Marketing: Developing targeted communication campaigns to raise awareness and change attitudes about organic waste management.
  • Policy Analysis: Evaluating the effectiveness of different policies and regulations related to organic waste management.

5. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Engineering and Biology: Combining engineering expertise with biological knowledge to develop innovative solutions for organic waste processing.
  • Environmental Science and Economics: Integrating environmental science with economic analysis to assess the costs and benefits of different organic waste management strategies.
  • Public Health and Social Sciences: Collaborating across disciplines to understand the public health and social implications of organic waste management practices.

Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Scaling Up: Moving from lab-scale research to large-scale implementation of new technologies and strategies.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Ensuring that new solutions are economically viable and competitive with existing waste management practices.
  • Public Acceptance: Gaining public support for new technologies and programs.
  • Policy and Regulatory Support: Creating a supportive policy environment that encourages innovation and investment in organic waste management.

By continuing to invest in research and development, we can unlock new and innovative solutions to achieve ambitious organic waste diversion targets, minimize environmental impact, and create a more sustainable future.

COURTESY : County of San Bernardino

References

  1. ^ Greenfield, Robin (October 6, 2014). “The Food Waste Fiasco: You Have to See it to Believe it!”. www.robingreenfield.org.
  2. ^ Jenny Gustavsson. Global food losses and food waste : extent, causes and prevention : study conducted for the International Congress “Save Food!” at Interpack 2011 Düsseldorf, Germany. OCLC 1126211917.
  3. ^ “UN Calls for Action to End Food Waste Culture”. Daily News Brief. October 4, 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-10-04. Retrieved 2021-10-04.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c UNEP Food Waste Index Report 2021 (Report). United Nations Environment Programme. March 4, 2021. ISBN 9789280738513. Archived from the original on 2022-02-01. Retrieved 2022-02-01.
  5. ^ “FAO – News Article: Food wastage: Key facts and figures”. www.fao.org. Archived from the original on 2021-06-07. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
  6. ^ “A third of food is wasted, making it third-biggest carbon emitter, U.N. says”. Reuters. September 11, 2013. Archived from the original on 2021-06-07. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
  7. ^ “Brief on food waste in the European Union”. European Commission. August 25, 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-11-15. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
  8. ^ “Food Recovery Hierarchy”. www.epa.gov. August 12, 2015. Archived from the original on 2019-05-23. Retrieved 2022-05-15.
  9. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313 Archived 2020-10-23 at the Wayback Machine)
  10. ^ “Reduced Food Waste”. Project Drawdown. February 12, 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-09-24. Retrieved 2020-09-19.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b “COP15: Nations Adopt Four Goals, 23 Targets for 2030 in Landmark UN Biodiversity Agreement”. Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations. Archived from the original on 2022-12-20. Retrieved 2023-01-09.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m FAO (2019). In brief: The State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome. Archived from the original on 2021-04-29. Retrieved 2021-06-21.
  13. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Bellemare, Marc F.; Çakir, Metin; Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa; Novak, Lindsey; Rudi, Jeta (2017). “On the Measurement of Food Waste”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 99 (5): 1148–1158. doi:10.1093/ajae/aax034.
  14. ^ Westendorf, Michael L. (2000). Food waste to animal feed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-8138-2540-3. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2020-10-31.
  15. ^ Jump up to:a b Oreopoulou, Vasso; Winfried Russ (2007). Utilization of by-products and treatment of waste in the food industry. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-33511-7. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2016-09-23.
  16. ^ “Definition of food loss and waste”. ThinkEatSave. Archived from the original on 2022-01-20. Retrieved 2022-02-01.
  17. ^ “Food Waste Index”. ThinkEatSave. Archived from the original on 2022-02-02. Retrieved 2022-02-01.
  18. ^ Environment, U. N. (March 21, 2024). “Food Waste Index Report 2024”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
  19. ^ United Nations Environment Programme (2024). Food Waste Index Report 2024. Think Eat Save: Tracking Progress to Halve Global Food Waste. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/45230.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Tarja Laaninen & Maria Paola Calasso (December 2020). “Reducing food waste in the European Union” (PDF). europarl.europa.eu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-12-07. Retrieved 2022-08-05.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b Consolidated text: Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste. No longer in force, Date of end of validity: 11/12/2010; Repealed by 32008L0098.[23]
  22. ^ Consolidated text: Council Directive of 15 July 1975 on waste (75/442/EEC). No longer in force, Date of end of validity: 16/05/2006; Repealed by 32006L0012.[21]
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b Consolidated text: Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives
  24. ^ Consolidated text: Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety
  25. ^ Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste
  26. ^ “Sustainable Management of Food Basics | US EPA”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 11, 2015. Archived from the original on 2022-08-05. Retrieved 2022-08-05.”Excess food refers to food that is recovered and donated to feed people. Food waste refers to food such as plate waste (i.e., food that has been served but not eaten), spoiled food, or peels and rinds considered inedible that is sent to feed animals, to be composted or anaerobically digested, or to be landfilled or combusted with energy recovery. Food loss refers to unused product from the agricultural sector, such as unharvested crops.”
  27. ^ “Terms of Environment: Glossary, Abbreviations and Acronyms (Glossary F)”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Archived from the original on 2003-02-19. Retrieved 2009-08-20.
  28. ^ “Organic Materials Management Glossary”. California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2008. Archived from the original on 2009-12-07. Retrieved 2009-08-20.
  29. ^ “Chapter 3.1. Compostable Materials Handling Operations and Facilities Regulatory Requirements”. California Integrated Waste Management Board. Archived from the original on 2009-10-09. Retrieved 2009-08-25.”Food Material” means any material that was acquired for animal or human consumption, is separated from the municipal solid waste stream, and that does not meet the definition of “agricultural material.”
  30. ^ “Food Waste Composting Regulations” (PDF). California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-06-10. Retrieved 2013-11-14.”Many states surveyed for this paper do not define food waste or distinguish between pre-consumer and post consumer food waste, while other states classify food waste types.”
  31. ^ Hall, K. D.; Guo, J.; Dore, M.; Chow, C. C. (November 2009). “The Progressive Increase of Food Waste in America and Its Environmental Impact”. PLOS ONE. 4 (11): e7940. Bibcode:2009PLoSO…4.7940H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007940. PMC 2775916. PMID 19946359.
  32. ^ Gunders, Dana (August 2012). “Wasted: How America Is Losing Up to 40 Percent of Its Food from Far to Fork to Landfill” (PDF). nrdc.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-06-17. Retrieved 2017-06-20.
  33. ^ Buzby, Jean C.; Hyman, Jeffrey (October 2012). “Total and per capita value of food loss in the United States”. Food Policy. 37 (5): 561–570. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.06.002. Archived from the original on 2022-08-05. Retrieved 2022-08-05.
  34. ^ “Food waste: The biggest loss could be what you choose to put in your mouth”. ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2024-04-05.
  35. ^ Shepon, Alon; Eshel, Gidon; Noor, Elad; Milo, Ron (April 10, 2018). “The opportunity cost of animal based diets exceeds all food losses”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (15): 3804–3809. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.3804S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1713820115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5899434. PMID 29581251.
  36. ^ Berners-Lee, M.; Kennelly, C.; Watson, R.; Hewitt, C. N. (2018). “Current global food production is sufficient to meet human nutritional needs in 2050 provided there is radical societal adaptation”. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 6: 52. Bibcode:2018EleSA…6…52B. doi:10.1525/elementa.310.
  37. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Kantor, Linda Scott; Lipton, Kathryn; Manchester, Alden; Oliveira, Victor (January–April 1997). “Estimating and Addressing America’s Food Losses” (PDF). Food Review (USDA): 2–12. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-03. [needs update]
  38. ^ Waters, Tony (2007). The Persistence of Subsistence Agriculture: life beneath the level of the marketplace. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-0768-3. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  39. ^ “Food Security”. Scientific Alliance. 2009. Archived from the original on 2011-07-11. Retrieved 2009-08-21.”… there is certainly a lot of waste in the system … Unless, that is, we were to go back to subsistence agriculture …”
  40. ^ Shepherd A.W. (1991). “A Market-Oriented Approach to Post-harvest Management” (PDF). Rome: FAO. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-09-29. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
  41. ^ Savary, Serge; Willocquet, Laetitia; Elazegui, Francisco A; Castilla, Nancy P; Teng, Paul S (2000). “Rice Pest Constraints in Tropical Asia: Quantification of Yield Losses Due to Rice Pests in a Range of Production Situations”. Plant Disease. 84 (3): 357–69. doi:10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.357. PMID 30841254.
  42. ^ Rosenzweig, Cynthia; Iglesias, Ana; Yang, X.B; Epstein, Paul R; Chivian, Eric (2001). “Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events; Implications for Food Production, Plant Diseases, and Pests”. Global Change and Human Health. 2 (2): 90–104. doi:10.1023/A:1015086831467. hdl:2286/R.I.55344. S2CID 44855998.
  43. ^ Haile, Menghestab (2005). “Weather patterns, food security and humanitarian response in sub-Saharan Africa”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 360 (1463): 2169–82. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1746. PMC 1569582. PMID 16433102.
  44. ^ “Food Waste”. GRACE Communications Foundation. Archived from the original on 2018-03-07. Retrieved 2018-03-10.
  45. ^ “Climate change mitigation”. OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Finland 2021. February 1, 2022. doi:10.1787/6a520df3-en. ISBN 978-92-64-84599-2. S2CID 131646210.
  46. ^ “Wonky fruit & vegetables make a comeback!”. European Parliament. 2009. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  47. ^ Goldenberg, Suzanna (July 13, 2016). “Half of all US food produce is thrown away, new research suggests”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-29.
  48. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Gustavson, Jenny; Cederberg, Christel; Sonesson, Ulf; van Otterdijk, Robert; Meybeck, Alexandre (2011). Global Food Losses and Food Waste (PDF). FAO. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-01-28. Retrieved 2015-10-15.
  49. ^ “Is it safe to eat apples picked off city trees?”. The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 2015-12-22. Retrieved 2015-12-17.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b Morris, Robert F.; United States National Research Council (1978). Postharvest food losses in developing countries. National Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2016-09-23.
  51. ^ Kumar, Deepak; Kalita, Prasanta (January 15, 2017). “Reducing Postharvest Losses during Storage of Grain Crops to Strengthen Food Security in Developing Countries”. Foods. 6 (1): 8. doi:10.3390/foods6010008. ISSN 2304-8158. PMC 5296677. PMID 28231087.
  52. ^ “Agricultural engineering in development – Post-harvest losses”. www.fao.org. Archived from the original on 2020-11-24. Retrieved 2020-11-10.
  53. ^ “Loss and waste: Do we really know what is involved?”. Food and Agriculture Organization. Archived from the original on 2009-11-09. Retrieved 2009-08-23.
  54. ^ Lacey, J (1989). “Pre- and post-harvest ecology of fungi causing spoilage of foods and other stored products”. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 67 (s18): 11s – 25s. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb03766.x. PMID 2508232.
  55. ^ “Post-harvest system and food losses”. Food and Agriculture Organization. Archived from the original on 2009-11-08. Retrieved 2009-08-23.
  56. ^ Dalzell, Janet M. (2000). Food industry and the environment in the European Union: practical issues and cost implications. Springer. p. 300. ISBN 978-0-8342-1719-5. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  57. ^ “Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Meat Processing” (PDF). International Finance Corporation. April 30, 2007. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-03-31. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
  58. ^ “Specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin”. Europa. 2009. Archived from the original on 2015-04-06. Retrieved 2009-08-29.”Foodstuffs of animal origin … may present microbiological and chemical hazards”
  59. ^ Jump up to:a b “Making the most of packaging, A strategy for a low-carbon economy” (PDF). Defra. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-01-08. Retrieved 2009-09-13.
  60. ^ Robertson, Gordon L. (2006). Food packaging: principles and practice. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-3775-8. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2009-09-27.
  61. ^ “Review of Food Waste Depackaging Equipment” (PDF). Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP). 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-07. Retrieved 2009-09-27.
  62. ^ Jump up to:a b “New Report: Food Expiration Date Confusion Causing up to 90% of Americans to Waste Food”. NRDC. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  63. ^ Greenaway, Twilight (June 26, 2016). “Can Walmart’s food labels make a dent in America’s $29bn food waste problem?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 2017-11-30. Retrieved 2017-12-01.
  64. ^ Sacks, Stefanie (2014). What the Fork Are You Eating?: An Action Plan for Your Pantry and Plate. Penguin Publishing Group. p. 155. ISBN 9780399167966. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2020-10-31.
  65. ^ Jump up to:a b *Stuart, Tristram (2009). Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal: The True Cost of What the Global Food Industry Throws Away. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-103634-2.
  66. ^ “6 Billion Pounds Of Perfectly Edible Produce Is Wasted Every Year Because It’s Ugly”. The Huffington Post. May 19, 2015. Archived from the original on 2015-12-22. Retrieved 2015-12-17.
  67. ^ “USDA Grades and Standards”. USDA. Archived from the original on 2015-08-05.
  68. ^ Jump up to:a b “Apple Grades and Standards”. Archived from the original on 2015-09-05.
  69. ^ “Fruit Product Sheet” (PDF). Produce Marketing Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  70. ^ “Food Waste Activities”. Archived from the original on 2021-06-09. Retrieved 2021-06-08.
  71. ^ “Wasted Food Programs and Resources Across the United States”. May 23, 2016. Archived from the original on 2021-06-09. Retrieved 2021-06-08.
  72. ^ “Plans for imperfect fruit and vegetables”. Farm Weekly. April 2, 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-04-23. Retrieved 2021-06-08.
  73. ^ “India has a food wastage problem. Here’s how individuals can make a difference”. April 7, 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-06-09. Retrieved 2021-06-08.
  74. ^ “Farms Aren’t Tossing Perfectly Good Produce. You Are”. The Washington Post. March 8, 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-05-28. Retrieved 2022-09-18.
  75. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parfitt, Julian; Barthel, Mark; Macnaughton, Sarah (September 27, 2010). “Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365 (1554): 3065–3081. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0126. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 2935112. PMID 20713403.
  76. ^ Sakaguchi, Leo; Pak, Nina; Potts, Matthew D. (April 2018). “Tackling the issue of food waste in restaurants: Options for measurement method, reduction and behavioral change”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 180: 430–436. Bibcode:2018JCPro.180..430S. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.136. S2CID 58898775.
  77. ^ Dhir, Amandeep; Talwar, Shalini; Kaur, Puneet; Malibari, Areej (October 2020). “Food waste in hospitality and food services: A systematic literature review and framework development approach”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 270: 122861. Bibcode:2020JCPro.27022861D. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122861. S2CID 225643816.
  78. ^ Viachaslau Filimonau; Hafize Fidan; Iordanka Alexieva; Stefan Dragoev; Denitsa Dimitrova Marinova (October 2019). “Restaurant food waste and the determinants of its effective management in Bulgaria: An exploratory case study of restaurants in Plovdiv” (PDF). Tourism Management Perspectives. 32. 100577. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100577. ISSN 2211-9736. S2CID 211783930. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2023-01-22.
  79. ^ “The Problem of Food Waste”. FoodPrint. Archived from the original on 2022-11-15. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Reynolds, Christian; Goucher, Liam; Quested, Tom; Bromley, Sarah; Gillick, Sam; Wells, Victoria K.; Evans, David; Koh, Lenny; Carlsson Kanyama, Annika; Katzeff, Cecilia; Svenfelt, Åsa; Jackson, Peter (February 1, 2019). “Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions”. Food Policy. 83: 7–27. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009. hdl:1983/7648588b-f7cc-44e3-bff5-a99861d7b89f. ISSN 0306-9192. S2CID 159069828.
  81. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pezoldt, Amy; McGilvery, Karen; Brown, Kevin; Papanek, Alicia; Simonne, Amarat; Wiley, Kimberly (July 1, 2024). “Ensuring Food Safety among Food and Agricultural Nonprofit Organizations: A Review of Literature about Challenges and Opportunities”. Food Protection Trends. 44 (4): 283–291. doi:10.4315/FPT-23-038.
  82. ^ Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica; De Hooge, Ilona; Amani, Pegah; Bech-Larsen, Tino; Oostindjer, Marije (2015). “Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action”. Sustainability. 7 (6): 6457–77. Bibcode:2015Sust….7.6457A. doi:10.3390/su7066457. hdl:11250/297664.
  83. ^ Serafini, Mauro; Toti, Elisabetta (2016). “Unsustainability of Obesity: Metabolic Food Waste”. Frontiers in Nutrition. 3: 40. doi:10.3389/fnut.2016.00040. ISSN 2296-861X. PMC 5054064. PMID 27774449.
  84. ^ Toti, Elisabetta; Di Mattia, Carla; Serafini, Mauro (August 23, 2019). “Metabolic Food Waste and Ecological Impact of Obesity in FAO World’s Region”. Frontiers in Nutrition. 6: 126. doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00126. ISSN 2296-861X. PMC 6715767. PMID 31508421.
  85. ^ Toti, Elisabetta; Di Mattia, Carla; Serafini, Mauro (October 11, 2019). “Corrigendum: Metabolic Food Waste and Ecological Impact of Obesity in FAO World’s Region”. Frontiers in Nutrition. 6: 160. doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00160. ISSN 2296-861X. PMC 6798267. PMID 31649933.
  86. ^ Sundin, Niina; Rosell, Magdalena; Eriksson, Mattias; Jensen, Carl; Bianchi, Marta (November 2021). “The climate impact of excess food intake – An avoidable environmental burden”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 174: 105777. Bibcode:2021RCR…17405777S. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105777.
  87. ^ Alexander, Peter; Brown, Calum; Arneth, Almut; Finnigan, John; Moran, Dominic; Rounsevell, Mark D.A. (May 2017). “Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system”. Agricultural Systems. 153: 190–200. Bibcode:2017AgSys.153..190A. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.014. PMC 5437836. PMID 28579671.
  88. ^ Reynolds, Christian; Goucher, Liam; Quested, Tom; Bromley, Sarah; Gillick, Sam; Wells, Victoria K.; Evans, David; Koh, Lenny; Carlsson Kanyama, Annika; Katzeff, Cecilia; Svenfelt, Åsa; Jackson, Peter (February 1, 2019). “Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions”. Food Policy. 83: 7–27. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009. hdl:1983/7648588b-f7cc-44e3-bff5-a99861d7b89f. ISSN 0306-9192.
  89. ^ Mrema, C. G. and Rolle, S. R. (2002). Status of the postharvest sector and its contribution to agricultural development and economic growth. 9th JIRCAS International Symposium – Value Addition to Agricultural Product, pp. 13-20. [1]
  90. ^ “Title: Disappearing Food: How Big are Postharvest Losses?” (PDF). EarthTrends. World Resources Institute. 1998. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-08.
  91. ^ Shepherd, Andrew W. “A Market-Orientated Approach to Post-Harvest Marketing” (PDF). FAO. Retrieved 2024-08-26.
  92. ^ FAO (2019). In brief: The State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome. p. 12.
  93. ^ The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. FAO. June 7, 2024. doi:10.4060/cd0683en. ISBN 978-92-5-138763-4. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  94. ^ “Technical Platform on the Measurement and Reduction of Food Loss and Waste”. fao.org. Archived from the original on 2018-09-30. Retrieved 2021-06-21.
  95. ^ “EU wastes 153m tonnes of food a year – much more than it imports, says report”. The Guardian. September 20, 2022. Archived from the original on 2022-09-21. Retrieved 2022-09-21.
  96. ^ Kim, Jim Yong (March 21, 2014). “Food Waste – a Bigger Problem Than You Thought”. Voices. Archived from the original on 2016-10-11. Retrieved 2016-04-28.
  97. ^ Institution of Mechanical Engineers. “Global Food: Waste not, want not” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-06-04. Retrieved 2014-07-01.
  98. ^ Wood, Stephanie (June 1, 2019). “‘We are gluttons’: our excessive food habits are creating a global wasteland”. The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 2019-06-05. Retrieved 2019-06-05.
  99. ^ Australian Government (2017). National Food Waste Strategy Halving Australia’s Food Waste by 2030. p. 1.
  100. ^ “Department of the Environment and Energy”. Department of the Environment and Energy. Archived from the original on 2019-05-11. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  101. ^ Jump up to:a b c Janus, Andrea (January 17, 2019). “More than half of all food produced in Canada is lost or wasted, report says”. CBC. Archived from the original on 2019-11-20. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  102. ^ Canada, Environment and Climate Change (October 19, 2018). “Food loss and waste”. aem. Archived from the original on 2019-09-25. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  103. ^ Serebrin, Jacob (September 19, 2022). “Quebec Liberal leader faces questions about her political future”. CBC. Retrieved 2022-09-30.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b c Davidson, Helen (December 23, 2020). “China to bring in law against food waste with fines for promoting overeating”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2021-01-01. Retrieved 2020-12-30.
  105. ^ Selina Juul (April 19, 2016). “Will Denmark Win The Global Race Against Food Waste?”. The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 2016-09-11. Retrieved 2016-04-19.
  106. ^ Helen Russell (July 13, 2016). “How did Denmark become a leader in the food waste revolution?”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2016-07-13. Retrieved 2016-07-13.
  107. ^ Irene Hell. “Denmark leads Europe in tackling food waste”. Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 2016-07-18. Retrieved 2016-07-18.
  108. ^ Jonathan Bloom. “Denmark Capitalizes on Culture to Stop Food Waste”. National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2018-11-16. Retrieved 2016-09-26.
  109. ^ Prathap Nair. “The country where unwanted food is selling out”. BBC. Archived from the original on 2017-01-24. Retrieved 2017-01-24.
  110. ^ Harriet Noble. “Denmark’s Food Waste Vigilante”. BBC World Hacks. Archived from the original on 2017-02-18. Retrieved 2017-02-18.
  111. ^ Kathleen Hawkins. “How one woman is winning the fight against food waste”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 2017-02-27. Retrieved 2017-02-27.
  112. ^ De Clercq, Djavan; Wen, Zongguo; Gottfried, Oliver; Schmidt, Franziska; Fei, Fan (November 1, 2017). “A review of global strategies promoting the conversion of food waste to bioenergy via anaerobic digestion”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 79: 204–221. Bibcode:2017RSERv..79..204D. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.047. ISSN 1364-0321.
  113. ^ Hinckley, Story. “France was the first country to ban supermarkets from throwing away unused food — and the world is taking notice”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on 2019-10-21. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  114. ^ Lemos, Liv. “4 ways France is leading the food waste agenda”. blog.winnowsolutions.com. Archived from the original on 2020-12-02. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  115. ^ Chrisafis, Angelique (February 4, 2016). “French law forbids food waste by supermarkets”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 2020-05-03. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  116. ^ Mourad, Marie (2015). “France Moves Toward a National Policy Against Food Waste”. NRDC. Archived from the original on 2020-09-22. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  117. ^ Dávid, Szakos; Barbara, Szabó-Bódi; Gyula, Kasza (2020). “Consumer awareness campaign to reduce household food waste based on structural equation behavior modeling in Hungary”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28 (19): 24580–24589. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09047-x. ISSN 0944-1344. PMC 8144144. PMID 32588298. S2CID 220050818.
  118. ^ Szabó-Bódi, Barbara; Kasza, Gyula; Szakos, Dávid (March 5, 2018). “Assessment of household food waste in Hungary”. British Food Journal. 120 (3): 625–638. doi:10.1108/bfj-04-2017-0255. ISSN 0007-070X.
  119. ^ Gyula, Kasza; Annamária, Dorkó; Atilla, Kunszabó; Dávid, Szakos (2020). “Quantification of Household Food Waste in Hungary: A Replication Study Using the FUSIONS Methodology”. Sustainability. 12 (8): 3069. Bibcode:2020Sust…12.3069K. doi:10.3390/su12083069.
  120. ^ Madarász, Tamás; Kontor, Enikő; Antal, Emese; Kasza, Gyula; Szakos, Dávid; Szakály, Zoltán (January 2022). “Food Purchase Behavior during The First Wave of COVID-19: The Case of Hungary”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (2): 872. doi:10.3390/ijerph19020872. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 8775895. PMID 35055687.
  121. ^ “Újabb lépés a fenntarthatóság felé: a magyar háztartások egyre kevesebb élelmiszert pazarolnak – Nébih”. portal.nebih.gov.hu. Retrieved 2024-03-29.
  122. ^ “Parl’t Passes New Bill Dealing Severe Blow to Hungary’s Largest, Foreign Supermarket Chains”. December 14, 2021. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  123. ^ “This is how the government wants to reduce Hungary’s food waste”. Daily News Hungary. December 30, 2021. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  124. ^ Waarts, Yuca; Eppink, Mieke; Oosterkamp, Elsje; Hiller, Sabine; van der Sluis, Addie; Timmermans, Toine (October 2011). “Reducing food waste – Obstacles experienced in legislation and regulations”. wur.nl. Archived from the original on 2019-02-18. Retrieved 2019-03-04.
  125. ^ Jump up to:a b Corné van Dooren (October 2019). “Synthesis report on Food Waste in Dutch Households in 2019” (PDF). Voedingscentrum (Netherlands Nutrition Centre Foundation). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-08-05. Retrieved 2022-08-05.
  126. ^ Tucker, C.A.; Farrelly, T. (March 10, 2015). “Household food waste: the implications of consumer choice in food from purchase to disposal”. Local Environment. 21 (6): 682–706. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1015972. ISSN 1354-9839. S2CID 154217938.
  127. ^ “Most people here concerned about food waste: Poll”. The Straits Times. August 11, 2015. Archived from the original on 2016-01-18. Retrieved 2015-10-26.
  128. ^ “2 hawker centres to pilot food waste recycling systems”. Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 2017-03-13. Retrieved 2016-04-28.
  129. ^ “Food waste: Where food matters, looks matter more”. Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 2017-03-12. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  130. ^ “Introduction”. www.towardszerowaste.sg. Archived from the original on 2020-06-13. Retrieved 2021-07-28.
  131. ^ “Food Wastage Statistics in Singapore”. Best in Singapore. June 27, 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-07-28. Retrieved 2021-07-28.
  132. ^ WRAP website, ‘’Household Food and Drink Waste UK 2021-22’’
  133. ^ Wintour, Patrick (July 7, 2008). “Brown urges Britons to cut food waste”. The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2009-02-19.
  134. ^ Jump up to:a b c Juliette Jowit (October 28, 2007). “Call to use leftovers and cut food waste”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Retrieved 2015-09-22.
  135. ^ “Food Loss and Waste”. www.usda.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-22.
  136. ^ “One-Third of Food Is Lost or Wasted: What Can Be Done”. news.nationalgeographic.com. October 13, 2014. Archived from the original on 2016-04-24. Retrieved 2016-04-25.
  137. ^ “US wastes half its food”. Archived from the original on 2008-07-05. Retrieved 2009-03-27.
  138. ^ “USDA ERS – The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States”. ers.usda.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  139. ^ Torrella, Kenny (January 30, 2022). “Billions of animals are slaughtered every year — just to be wasted”. Vox. Archived from the original on 2022-01-31. Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  140. ^ “Food and Climate Change: Healthy diets for a healthier planet”. United Nations. Retrieved 2023-08-22.
  141. ^ Accelerating the transition in the context of 2 sustainable development, Ch 17 in “Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change”. www.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 2022-04-06.
  142. ^ FAO (2019). In brief: The State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome. pp. 14–15. Archived from the original on 2021-04-29. Retrieved 2021-06-21.
  143. ^ Jump up to:a b “Wrap – Household Food Waste”. Archived from the original on 2010-03-05. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  144. ^ “Britain’s colossal food waste is stoking climate change”. The Independent. Archived from the original on 2012-10-25. Retrieved 2015-09-22.
  145. ^ Brancoli, Pedro; Lundin, Magnus; Bolton, Kim; Eriksson, Mattias (August 2019). “Bread loss rates at the supplier-retailer interface – Analysis of risk factors to support waste prevention measures”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 147: 128–136. Bibcode:2019RCR…147..128B. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.027. ISSN 0921-3449. S2CID 165125605. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
  146. ^ Sundin, Niina; Persson Osowski, Christine; Strid, Ingrid; Eriksson, Mattias (June 1, 2022). “Surplus food donation: Effectiveness, carbon footprint, and rebound effect”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 181: 106271. Bibcode:2022RCR…18106271S. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106271. ISSN 0921-3449. S2CID 247347392.
  147. ^ Eriksson, Mattias; Bartek, Louise; Löfkvist, Klara; Malefors, Christopher; Olsson, Marie E. (January 2021). “Environmental Assessment of Upgrading Horticultural Side Streams—The Case of Unharvested Broccoli Leaves”. Sustainability. 13 (10): 5327. Bibcode:2021Sust…13.5327E. doi:10.3390/su13105327. ISSN 2071-1050.
  148. ^ Brancoli, Pedro; Bolton, Kim; Eriksson, Mattias (November 1, 2020). “Environmental impacts of waste management and valorisation pathways for surplus bread in Sweden”. Waste Management. 117: 136–145. Bibcode:2020WaMan.117..136B. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.043. ISSN 0956-053X. PMID 32823078. S2CID 221239106.
  149. ^ Eriksson, Mattias; Spångberg, Johanna (February 2017). “Carbon footprint and energy use of food waste management options for fresh fruit and vegetables from supermarkets”. Waste Management. 60: 786–799. Bibcode:2017WaMan..60..786E. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.008. PMID 28089203. Archived from the original on 2022-06-15. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
  150. ^ Bartek, L.; Strid, I.; Henryson, K.; Junne, S.; Rasi, S.; Eriksson, M. (July 1, 2021). “Life cycle assessment of fish oil substitute produced by microalgae using food waste”. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 27: 2002–2021. Bibcode:2021SusPC..27.2002B. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.033. ISSN 2352-5509. S2CID 236313119.
  151. ^ Calvo-Porral, Cristina; Medín, Andrés Faiña; Losada-López, Chema (2016). “Can Marketing Help in Tackling Food Waste?: Proposals in Developed Countries”. Journal of Food Products Marketing. 23 (1): 42–60. doi:10.1080/10454446.2017.1244792. S2CID 168288402.
  152. ^ Quested, Tom (November 2009). “Household Food and Drink Waste in the UK” (PDF). WRAP. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-10-24. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  153. ^ “Food spoilage indicator – Packaging World”. Archived from the original on 2016-07-11. Retrieved 2016-03-20.
  154. ^ “The smart way to reduce food waste – Global Food Security”. foodsecurity.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2016-12-15. Retrieved 2017-01-03.
  155. ^ Ryan Jaslow (March 17, 2014). Smart tags change color when food goes bad. CBC News. Archived from the original on 2016-03-18. Retrieved 2016-03-20.
  156. ^ Cambio verde project in Curitiba, Brazil Archived 2014-03-08 at the Wayback Machine
  157. ^ Depouillon, Joris. “Food Surplus Entrepreneur”. EU FUSIONS. Archived from the original on 2016-01-18. Retrieved 2015-08-09.
  158. ^ Bernstad Saraiva Schott, A., Wenzel, H., la Cour Jansen, J., 2016. Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative lifecycle assessments of food waste management – an analytical review. J. Clean. Prod. 119, 13–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.079 Archived 2023-03-02 at the Wayback Machine.
  159. ^ Salemdeeb, Ramy; Font Vivanco, David; Al-Tabbaa, Abir; zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K. H. J. (January 1, 2017). “A holistic approach to the environmental evaluation of food waste prevention”. Waste Management. 59: 442–450. Bibcode:2017WaMan..59..442S. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.042. ISSN 0956-053X. PMID 27712945.
  160. ^ Hegwood, Margaret; Burgess, Matthew G.; Costigliolo, Erin M.; Smith, Pete; Bajželj, Bojana; Saunders, Harry; Davis, Steven J. (July 20, 2023). “Rebound effects could offset more than half of avoided food loss and waste”. Nature Food. 4 (7): 585–595. doi:10.1038/s43016-023-00792-z. hdl:2164/21858. PMID 37474803. S2CID 259995095.
  161. ^ “Most of the smaller cities in this country dispose of a part or all their garbage by feeding to swine, but … only four maintain municipal piggeries.” Capes and Carpenter, 1918, p. 169
  162. ^ Joel Rose (March 11, 2014). “Turning Food Waste Into Fuel Takes Gumption And Trillions Of Bacteria”. NPR. Archived from the original on 2018-10-04. Retrieved 2018-04-05.
  163. ^ From Farm to Fridge to Garbage Can Archived 2010-11-08 at the Wayback Machine. // The New York Times, 1.11.2010
  164. ^ “Frequently Asked Questions”. United States Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 2016-05-22. Retrieved 2016-04-28.
  165. ^ Chicken Feed: How to Feed Chickens (November 19, 2010). “Feeding Chickens: What to feed chickens to keep them healthy | Keeping Chickens: A Beginners Guide”. Keeping Chickens. Archived from the original on 2012-10-16. Retrieved 2012-10-21.
  166. ^ Heuzé V., Thiollet H., Tran G., Boudon A., Bastianelli D., Lebas F., 2018. Bakery waste. Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/70 Archived 2018-02-02 at the Wayback Machine Last updated on February 1, 2018, 15:46
  167. ^ “AgriProtein using food and abattoir waste to farm maggots”. Wired UK. Archived from the original on 2017-08-07. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
  168. ^ “Cockroaches are helping a Chinese city process its food waste”. Futurism. Archived from the original on 2018-12-16. Retrieved 2018-12-14.
  169. ^ Roy, Ken (October 2011). “Trash talk: How to compost safely”. Science Scope. 35 (2): 82–3. JSTOR 43183137.
  170. ^ “Recycling”. United States Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-03.
  171. ^ Jump up to:a b Meadows, Robin (August 2009). “Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment”. Compulsory Composting. 7 (6): 292. JSTOR 25595163.
  172. ^ “NY Will Require More Restaurants to Put Waste to Good Use”. NBC New York. February 15, 2018. Archived from the original on 2023-03-02. Retrieved 2018-02-20.
  173. ^ Bloom, Jonathan (2010). American Wasteland: How America Throws Away Nearly Half of Its Food (and What We Can Do about It). Cambridge, MA: 1st Da Capo Press. p. 140.
  174. ^ Hargreaves, J; Adl, M; Warman, P (2008). “A review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture”. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 123 (1–3): 1–14. Bibcode:2008AgEE..123….1H. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.004.
  175. ^ Centola, Damon; Becker, Joshua; Brackbill, Devon (June 8, 2018). “Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention”. Science. 360 (6393): 1116–1119. Bibcode:2018Sci…360.1116C. doi:10.1126/science.aas8827. PMID 29880688. Retrieved 2024-02-17.
  176. ^ “The Benefits of Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste At Wastewater Treatment Facilities”. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. April 15, 2013. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  177. ^ Hedlund, FH; Madsen, M (2018). “Incomplete understanding of biogas chemical hazards – Serious gas poisoning accident while unloading food waste at biogas plant” (PDF). Journal of Chemical Health & Safety. 25 (6): 13–21. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2018.05.004. S2CID 67849856. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2021-06-19.
  178. ^ “Anaerobic Digesters and Biogas Safety”. eXtension. April 2, 2012. Archived from the original on 2018-11-16. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  179. ^ “State of Oregon: Solid Waste Disposal Site Permits – Regulating Composting Facilities and Anaerobic Digesters”. oregon.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  180. ^ “Shelton, Conn. Fined $142K for Illegal Sewage Discharges to Housatonic River”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. June 19, 2008. Retrieved 2024-07-09.
  181. ^ Aging Water Infrastructure Research: Addressing the Challenge Through Science and Innovation. United States Environmental Protection Agency. July 2011. OCLC 788431880.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »