Leave a Comment / Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% / By

Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

Here are some examples of materials with recycled content:

  • 10% Recycled Content:
    • Paper: Many paper products, such as newspapers, cardboard, and office paper, contain at least 10% recycled content.
    • Plastic: Some plastic products, such as bottles and containers, may contain a small percentage of recycled plastic.
    • Glass: Some glass products, such as bottles and jars, may contain a small percentage of recycled glass.
  • 20% Recycled Content:
    • Carpet: Some carpets are made with recycled plastic fibers.
    • Building Materials: Some building materials, such as roofing shingles and insulation, may contain recycled content.
    • Clothing: Some clothing items, such as jackets and sweaters, may be made with recycled materials like plastic bottles or textile scraps.
  • 30% Recycled Content:
    • Steel: Some steel products, such as construction beams and car parts, may contain a significant percentage of recycled steel.
    • Aluminum: Some aluminum products, such as cans and foil, may contain a significant percentage of recycled aluminum.
    • Concrete: Some concrete mixes may include recycled materials like crushed concrete or industrial byproducts.

The percentage of recycled content in a material can vary depending on the product and manufacturer. When purchasing products with recycled content, look for labels that indicate the percentage of recycled material used.

What is Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

Materials with recycled content refer to products made from materials that have been recovered from waste and reprocessed into new products. This helps reduce the need for virgin materials and minimizes waste sent to landfills.

The percentage of recycled content in a material indicates the proportion of the product that comes from recycled sources. For example, a product with 10% recycled content means that 10% of the material used to make it comes from recycled materials, while the remaining 90% may come from virgin materials or a combination of virgin and recycled materials.

Common materials with recycled content include paper, plastic, glass, metal, and construction materials. The percentage of recycled content can vary widely depending on the specific product and the availability of recycled materials.

Here are some examples of materials with different percentages of recycled content:

  • 10% Recycled Content:
    • Paper products like newspapers, cardboard, and office paper often contain at least 10% recycled content.
    • Some plastic products, such as bottles and containers, may include a small percentage of recycled plastic.
    • Certain glass products, like bottles and jars, might have a small percentage of recycled glass.
  • 20% Recycled Content:
    • Carpets can be made with recycled plastic fibers.
    • Some building materials, such as roofing shingles and insulation, may contain recycled content.
    • Clothing items like jackets and sweaters can be made with recycled materials like plastic bottles or textile scraps.
  • 30% Recycled Content:
    • Steel products, such as construction beams and car parts, may contain a significant percentage of recycled steel.
    • Aluminum products like cans and foil can have a significant percentage of recycled aluminum.
    • Concrete mixes may include recycled materials like crushed concrete or industrial byproducts.

When purchasing products with recycled content, it’s helpful to look for labels that indicate the specific percentage of recycled material used. This allows consumers to make informed choices and support the use of recycled materials.

Who is required Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

The requirement for materials with specific recycled content percentages can come from various sources, including:

  • Government Regulations: Some regions have laws mandating minimum recycled content in certain products, like packaging, to promote recycling and reduce waste.
  • Industry Standards: Organizations and associations may set standards for recycled content in specific industries, encouraging manufacturers to use recycled materials.
  • Consumer Demand: Growing awareness of environmental issues has led to increased consumer demand for products with recycled content, influencing manufacturers to incorporate recycled materials.
  • Corporate Sustainability Goals: Many companies have set sustainability targets, including using recycled materials in their products to reduce their environmental footprint.
  • Green Building Certifications: Programs like GGBC : Global green building council (GGBC) award points for using materials with recycled content in construction projects.

Therefore, the requirement for specific recycled content percentages can be driven by a combination of regulations, industry practices, consumer preferences, and organizational goals.

When is required Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

The requirement for materials with specific recycled content percentages is becoming increasingly common, driven by a growing awareness of environmental issues and the need for sustainable practices. Here’s a breakdown of when these requirements might apply:

Currently and in the near future:

  • Government Regulations: Several regions have already implemented laws mandating minimum recycled content in specific products, particularly packaging. For example, California has legislation requiring increasing percentages of recycled content in plastic beverage containers. Other states and countries are following suit with similar regulations. These laws often have specific timelines for reaching certain recycled content targets.
  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Laws: Many jurisdictions are adopting EPR laws, which make producers responsible for the end-of-life management of their products, including packaging. These laws often include recycled content requirements or incentives.
  • Green Building Certifications: Programs like GGBC are increasingly incorporating recycled content requirements into their criteria, encouraging the use of recycled materials in construction projects.

Ongoing and evolving:

  • Industry Standards: Various industry associations are developing standards and guidelines for recycled content, promoting its use in specific sectors. These standards may be voluntary initially but could become mandatory in the future.
  • Consumer Demand: As consumers become more environmentally conscious, they are actively seeking products with recycled content. This growing demand is pushing manufacturers to incorporate recycled materials into their products.
  • Corporate Sustainability Goals: Many companies are setting ambitious sustainability targets, which often include commitments to using recycled materials in their products. These goals drive the demand for recycled content across various industries.

Looking ahead:

  • Increased Regulations: It is expected that more regions will introduce regulations mandating recycled content in various products to address waste management and resource conservation.
  • Stricter Standards: Existing standards and certifications are likely to become more stringent, requiring higher percentages of recycled content.
  • Wider Application: The use of recycled content is expected to expand beyond packaging and construction to other sectors like textiles, electronics, and automotive.

In summary:

The requirement for materials with specific recycled content percentages is not a one-time event but rather an ongoing trend. It is driven by a combination of government regulations, industry initiatives, consumer preferences, and corporate commitments. As environmental awareness grows and technology advances, we can expect to see more stringent requirements and wider applications of recycled content in the future.

COURTESY : Business Insider

Where is required Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

You’re asking a great question that highlights the growing importance of recycled content! Here’s a breakdown of where you’re likely to find requirements for materials with recycled content:

1. Government Regulations:

  • Specific Products: Many regions have laws mandating minimum recycled content in certain products, especially packaging. Think:
    • Plastic beverage bottles (California is a leader here)
    • Plastic grocery bags
    • Trash bags
    • Certain paper products
  • Focus on Plastics: Due to the high volume of plastic waste, regulations often target plastic packaging and products.
  • Expanding Scope: Expect more regulations to come, covering a wider range of materials and products.

2. Industry Standards and Certifications:

  • Green Building: Programs like GGBC : Global green building council (GGBC) award points for using recycled content in construction. This drives demand for recycled materials in:
    • Flooring
    • Insulation
    • Roofing
    • Concrete
  • Other Industries: Various sectors are developing their own standards. Examples include:
    • Textiles (for clothing, carpets)
    • Automotive (for car parts)

3. Consumer-Driven Demand:

  • Eco-Conscious Consumers: More people are actively seeking products with recycled content, influencing manufacturers to incorporate it. This applies to a wide range of goods:
    • Packaging
    • Clothing
    • Household items
    • Electronics

4. Corporate Sustainability Goals:

  • Company Commitments: Many companies have public sustainability targets, including using recycled materials in their products. This can apply to:
    • Manufacturing processes
    • Product design
    • Packaging

5. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Laws:

  • Producer Responsibility: These laws make manufacturers responsible for the end-of-life management of their products, often including recycled content requirements or incentives.

Where to Find Specifics:

  • Government Websites: Check the environmental agencies of your local, regional, or national government.
  • Industry Associations: Many industry bodies publish guidelines and standards for their members.
  • Product Labels: Look for labels that clearly state the percentage of recycled content.
  • Company Sustainability Reports: Many companies publish reports outlining their sustainability initiatives.

Important Note: The specific requirements vary significantly depending on the location, product, and industry. Always check the relevant regulations and standards for the most accurate information.

How is required Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

The “how” behind requiring materials with recycled content can be broken down into several key drivers and mechanisms:

1. Legislative and Regulatory Framework:

  • Mandates: Governments at various levels (local, regional, national) can pass laws requiring specific percentages of recycled content in certain products. This is the most direct way to enforce recycled content requirements. These mandates often target specific materials like plastics, paper, or glass.
  • Incentives: Governments can also offer incentives, such as tax breaks or subsidies, to encourage manufacturers to use recycled materials. This can make recycled materials more economically competitive.
  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): EPR laws shift the responsibility for managing the end-of-life of products to the producers. This often includes requirements for incorporating recycled content or achieving specific recycling rates.

2. Standards and Certifications:

  • Industry Standards: Organizations and associations can develop voluntary standards for recycled content in specific industries. While not legally binding, these standards can influence industry practices and consumer choices.
  • Third-Party Certifications: Independent organizations can certify products that meet certain recycled content criteria. These certifications can help consumers identify and choose products with recycled materials. Examples include certifications related to recycled paper or plastics.
  • Green Building Rating Systems: Programs like GGBC require the use of materials with recycled content for buildings to achieve certification. This creates a market demand for recycled building materials.

3. Market Forces and Consumer Demand:

  • Consumer Preference: Growing awareness of environmental issues has led to increased consumer demand for products made with recycled materials. This consumer preference can drive manufacturers to incorporate recycled content to attract customers.
  • Brand Reputation: Companies can enhance their brand image by using recycled materials and promoting their commitment to sustainability. This can be a competitive advantage in the marketplace.

4. Corporate Sustainability Initiatives:

  • Sustainability Goals: Many companies have set internal sustainability targets, including commitments to using recycled materials in their products or packaging. These goals can be driven by a desire to reduce environmental impact, improve brand reputation, or meet stakeholder expectations.
  • Supply Chain Collaboration: Companies can work with their suppliers to increase the availability and use of recycled materials throughout their supply chains.

5. Technological Advancements:

  • Improved Recycling Technologies: Advances in recycling technologies make it easier and more cost-effective to recover and reprocess materials. This increases the availability of high-quality recycled materials for use in new products.
  • Design for Recyclability: Designing products with recyclability in mind from the outset can facilitate the recovery and reuse of materials at the end of the product’s life.

In essence, the requirement for recycled content is driven by a combination of “push” factors (regulations, standards) and “pull” factors (consumer demand, corporate initiatives). These forces work together to create a market environment where recycled materials are increasingly valued and used.

Case study is Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

Let’s explore a case study focusing on the use of recycled content in plastic packaging, specifically looking at achieving 10%, 20%, and 30% recycled content targets. This is a relevant area due to the large volume of plastic waste generated.

Case Study: Recycled Content in Plastic Packaging

Scenario: A company manufactures plastic bottles for beverages. They want to increase the recycled content in their bottles to meet growing consumer demand for sustainable products and comply with potential future regulations. They’ve set targets of 10%, 20%, and 30% recycled content.

Challenges:

  • Sourcing Recycled Plastic (rPET): Securing a consistent supply of high-quality rPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate, the type of plastic used for many bottles) can be challenging. The availability and cost of rPET fluctuate depending on recycling rates and market conditions.
  • Maintaining Product Quality: Incorporating recycled plastic can sometimes affect the clarity, strength, and other properties of the final product. Ensuring the bottles meet safety and performance standards is crucial.
  • Consumer Perception: Consumers need to be confident that bottles made with recycled content are safe and of the same quality as those made from virgin plastic.
  • Cost: rPET can sometimes be more expensive than virgin PET, impacting the overall cost of production.

Strategies and Solutions:

  • 10% Recycled Content:
    • Blending: A relatively straightforward approach is to blend a small percentage of rPET with virgin PET. This can be done with minimal changes to existing manufacturing processes.
    • Post-Industrial Recycled Material: Using recycled plastic generated from the company’s own manufacturing processes (e.g., scraps, trimmings) can be a cost-effective way to achieve the initial target.
  • 20% Recycled Content:
    • Increased rPET Sourcing: The company needs to establish reliable partnerships with recycling facilities and rPET suppliers to secure a larger volume of recycled material.
    • Improved rPET Processing: Investing in technologies to clean and reprocess rPET is essential to ensure consistent quality and remove contaminants.
    • Testing and Quality Control: Rigorous testing is needed to verify that the bottles meet all performance and safety standards with the increased recycled content.
  • 30% Recycled Content:
    • Chemical Recycling: For higher percentages, chemical recycling (depolymerization) may be necessary to break down complex plastic waste into its molecular building blocks, which can then be used to create virgin-quality plastic. This technology is still developing but offers great potential.
    • Collaboration and Partnerships: Working with other companies, recyclers, and technology providers is vital to develop and scale up chemical recycling and other advanced recycling solutions.
    • Consumer Education: Communicating the benefits of recycled content and addressing any consumer concerns about quality and safety is crucial to build trust and support.

Results and Outcomes (Hypothetical):

  • Increased Recycled Content: The company successfully achieves its recycled content targets, reducing its reliance on virgin plastic.
  • Reduced Environmental Impact: This leads to a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, and plastic waste.
  • Enhanced Brand Reputation: The company’s commitment to sustainability enhances its brand image and attracts environmentally conscious consumers.
  • Cost Considerations: The company carefully manages costs through efficient sourcing, processing, and potentially passing on small, justified increases to consumers. Government incentives and increasing economies of scale can help to reduce the cost differential between virgin and recycled plastics.

Key Learnings:

  • Phased Approach: A gradual, phased approach to increasing recycled content is often more manageable.
  • Collaboration is Key: Partnerships across the value chain, from recyclers to consumers, are essential for success.
  • Technological Innovation: Investing in advanced recycling technologies is crucial for achieving higher recycled content targets.
  • Transparency and Communication: Openly communicating the benefits and challenges of using recycled content builds trust with consumers.

This case study illustrates the complexities and opportunities associated with increasing recycled content in plastic packaging. While challenges exist, the trend toward greater use of recycled materials is clear, driven by environmental concerns, regulatory pressures, and consumer demand.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD6WhlStCRg

COURTESY : i am SIGH

White paper on Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

White Paper: Materials with Recycled Content: Achieving 10%, 20%, and 30% Targets

Executive Summary:

The increasing urgency to address plastic waste, conserve resources, and mitigate climate change has placed a strong emphasis on utilizing recycled materials in manufacturing. This white paper examines the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating recycled content into products, specifically focusing on achieving 10%, 20%, and 30% recycled content targets. It explores various strategies, technologies, and market dynamics influencing the adoption of recycled materials, highlighting the importance of collaboration, innovation, and consumer engagement for a sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The linear “take-make-dispose” model of consumption is unsustainable. The accumulation of waste, particularly plastic, in landfills and oceans poses a significant threat to the environment. Transitioning to a circular economy, where materials are kept in use for as long as possible, is crucial. Incorporating recycled content into new products is a key element of this transition, reducing reliance on virgin resources and minimizing waste.

2. Drivers for Recycled Content:

  • Environmental Concerns: Reducing pollution, conserving natural resources, and minimizing landfill space.
  • Regulatory Pressures: Increasing legislation mandating recycled content in specific products and packaging.
  • Consumer Demand: Growing consumer preference for sustainable and eco-friendly products.
  • Corporate Sustainability Goals: Companies setting targets for recycled content to reduce their environmental footprint.
  • Economic Benefits: Potential cost savings from using recycled materials and accessing new markets.

3. Challenges in Achieving Recycled Content Targets:

  • Sourcing and Availability: Securing a consistent supply of high-quality recycled materials can be challenging.
  • Quality and Performance: Maintaining product quality and performance with recycled content.
  • Cost Competitiveness: Recycled materials may sometimes be more expensive than virgin materials.
  • Technological Limitations: Difficulties in recycling certain materials and achieving high levels of purity.
  • Consumer Perception: Addressing concerns about the safety and quality of products made with recycled content.

4. Strategies for Increasing Recycled Content:

  • 10% Recycled Content:
    • Blending: Mixing a small percentage of recycled material with virgin material.
    • Post-Industrial Recycling: Utilizing recycled material generated from manufacturing processes.
    • Focus on Easily Recyclable Materials: Starting with materials like paper, cardboard, and certain plastics.
  • 20% Recycled Content:
    • Improved Collection and Sorting: Enhancing recycling infrastructure to increase the availability of recycled materials.
    • Advanced Processing Techniques: Investing in technologies to clean and reprocess recycled materials.
    • Design for Recyclability: Designing products with recyclability in mind.
  • 30% Recycled Content and Beyond:
    • Chemical Recycling: Breaking down complex plastic waste into its molecular building blocks for reuse.
    • Closed-Loop Systems: Creating systems where materials are continuously recycled and reused within a specific industry.
    • Collaboration and Partnerships: Working across the value chain to develop and implement innovative recycling solutions.

5. Technological Advancements:

  • Improved Sorting and Separation: Automated systems for efficiently sorting different types of waste.
  • Advanced Reprocessing Technologies: Techniques for removing contaminants and improving the quality of recycled materials.
  • Chemical Recycling: Depolymerization and other processes for breaking down plastics into their constituent monomers.
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Tools for evaluating the environmental impact of products and processes, including the use of recycled materials.

6. Market Dynamics and Consumer Engagement:

  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Policies that make producers responsible for the end-of-life management of their products.
  • Incentives and Subsidies: Government support for recycling infrastructure and the use of recycled materials.
  • Consumer Education and Awareness: Raising awareness about the benefits of recycled content and encouraging consumer purchasing decisions.
  • Transparency and Labeling: Providing clear and accurate information about the recycled content of products.

7. Case Studies:

(Include examples of companies successfully implementing recycled content strategies)

8. Recommendations:

  • Invest in Recycling Infrastructure: Expanding and modernizing recycling facilities.
  • Promote Design for Recyclability: Encouraging manufacturers to design products that are easily recyclable.
  • Support Technological Innovation: Funding research and development of advanced recycling technologies.
  • Engage Consumers: Educating consumers about the importance of recycling and purchasing products with recycled content.
  • Foster Collaboration: Building partnerships across the value chain to create a circular economy for materials.

9. Conclusion:

Achieving 10%, 20%, and 30% recycled content targets requires a multifaceted approach involving technological advancements, policy support, industry commitment, and consumer engagement. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a future where recycled materials play a central role in a thriving circular economy.

Industrial application of Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

Industrial Applications of Materials with Recycled Content (10%, 20%, 30%)

The use of recycled materials in industrial applications is rapidly increasing due to environmental concerns, resource scarcity, and economic benefits. Here’s a breakdown of how different levels of recycled content are being utilized across various industries:

10% Recycled Content:

  • Packaging: Many packaging materials, especially paperboard and cardboard, readily incorporate 10% or more recycled content. This is a common practice due to the ease of recycling paper and the relatively low impact on material properties at this level.
  • Construction: Recycled aggregates, such as crushed concrete or asphalt, can be used in roadbeds, foundations, and other construction applications at this level. This helps divert construction and demolition waste from landfills.
  • Consumer Goods: Products like trash bags, some plastic containers, and certain textiles can utilize up to 10% recycled content without significant changes in manufacturing processes or product
  • Automotive: Car manufacturers are increasingly using recycled steel and aluminum in vehicle components. This helps reduce the environmental impact of car production and conserve valuable resources.
  • Building Materials: Products like roofing shingles, insulation, and some composite lumber can incorporate up to 20% recycled content. This contributes to green building initiatives and reduces reliance on virgin materials.
  • Furniture: Some furniture manufacturers are using recycled wood, plastic, or metal in their products. This helps create more sustainable furniture options for consumers.
  • Textiles: The textile industry is exploring the use of recycled fibers, such as polyester from plastic bottles or cotton scraps, in clothing and other textile products at this level.

30% Recycled Content and Beyond:

  • Plastics: Achieving 30% or more recycled content in plastics requires advanced recycling technologies, such as chemical recycling, to break down plastic waste into its molecular building blocks. This is being applied in packaging, automotive, and other sectors.
  • Metals: Aluminum and steel are highly recyclable and can be used to produce new products with very high percentages of recycled content. This is common in the packaging industry (aluminum cans) and construction (steel beams).
  • Electronics: E-waste contains valuable metals and other materials that can be recovered and reused. Companies are working to increase the recycled content in electronic devices.
  • Advanced Materials: Research is underway to develop advanced materials, such as composites and bioplastics, with high percentages of recycled content for use in aerospace, automotive, and other demanding applications.

General Trends and Considerations:

  • Technological Advancements: Innovation in recycling technologies, such as improved sorting, depolymerization, and purification, is crucial for increasing the use of recycled materials.
  • Quality and Performance: Ensuring that recycled materials meet the required quality and performance standards for different applications is essential.
  • Supply Chain Development: Building robust supply chains for collecting, processing, and distributing recycled materials is critical.
  • Consumer Acceptance: Educating consumers about the benefits and safety of products made with recycled content is important for driving market demand.

Examples of Industrial Applications:

  • Construction: Recycled concrete aggregate in road construction, recycled steel in building structures.
  • Packaging: rPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate) bottles, recycled cardboard boxes.
  • Automotive: Recycled steel and aluminum in car bodies, recycled plastics in interior components.
  • Textiles: Clothing made with recycled polyester fibers, carpets made with recycled nylon.
  • Electronics: Recycled metals and plastics in electronic devices.

Benefits of Using Recycled Content:

  • Resource Conservation: Reduces the need for virgin materials.
  • Waste Reduction: Diverts waste from landfills.
  • Energy Savings: Often requires less energy to process recycled materials compared to virgin materials.
  • Environmental Protection: Reduces pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Economic Opportunities: Creates jobs in recycling and related industries.

Conclusion:

The industrial application of materials with recycled content is a growing trend with significant environmental and economic benefits. As technology advances and consumer demand increases, we can expect to see even greater use of recycled materials in various industries, contributing to a more sustainable future.

Research and development of Materials with Recycled Content 10%, 20%, 30% ?

The research and development (R&D) of materials with recycled content is a dynamic field, driven by the need to create a circular economy and reduce our reliance on virgin resources. Here’s a look at some key areas of focus:

1. Advanced Recycling Technologies:

  • Chemical Recycling: This breaks down plastic waste into its molecular building blocks, which can then be used to create virgin-quality plastic. This is crucial for achieving high recycled content targets (30% and beyond) and for dealing with mixed plastic waste that is difficult to recycle mechanically.
    • Depolymerization: Different chemical processes are used to break down various types of plastics (PET, PS, PP, etc.) into their monomers.
    • Pyrolysis: Heating plastic waste in the absence of oxygen to produce oils and gases that can be used to create new plastics or fuels.
  • Solvolysis: Using solvents to dissolve and recover specific polymers from complex waste streams.
  • Purification Technologies: Developing methods to remove contaminants and improve the quality of recycled materials, especially for use in food-grade packaging or other demanding applications.

2. Material Science and Engineering:

  • Developing New Materials: Creating innovative materials that incorporate high percentages of recycled content without compromising performance, durability, or aesthetics.
  • Improving Material Properties: Researching ways to enhance the properties of recycled materials, such as strength, flexibility, and resistance to degradation.
  • Designing for Recyclability: Developing products and packaging that are easier to recycle, with fewer mixed materials and components that can be readily separated.

3. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA):

  • Measuring Environmental Impact: Using LCA to evaluate the environmental impact of products and processes, including the use of recycled materials. This helps to quantify the benefits of recycling and identify areas for improvement.
  • Optimizing Recycling Processes: LCA can be used to optimize recycling processes and minimize their environmental footprint.

4. Collection and Sorting Technologies:

  • Improving Collection Systems: Developing more efficient and convenient ways to collect recyclable materials, such as curbside collection programs and deposit schemes.
  • Advanced Sorting Technologies: Implementing automated systems using AI, robotics, and sensors to efficiently sort different types of waste, including plastics, paper, metals, and textiles.

5. Applications-Specific Research:

  • Packaging: Developing food-grade recycled plastics for packaging applications, ensuring safety and quality.
  • Construction: Researching the use of recycled materials in concrete, asphalt, and other building materials, improving their performance and durability.
  • Textiles: Exploring new ways to recycle and reuse textile fibers, creating closed-loop systems for the textile industry.
  • Electronics: Developing methods to recover valuable materials from e-waste and increase the recycled content in electronic devices.

6. Collaboration and Partnerships:

  • Industry Collaboration: Fostering collaboration between companies, recyclers, technology providers, and research institutions to accelerate the development and implementation of recycled content solutions.
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Encouraging public-private partnerships to invest in recycling infrastructure and R&D.

Examples of Ongoing Research:

  • Developing bio-based plastics that are both recyclable and compostable.
  • Creating new composite materials that incorporate recycled plastics and other waste materials.
  • Improving the efficiency of chemical recycling processes to reduce energy consumption and costs.
  • Developing new methods for recycling textiles and recovering valuable fibers.

Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Cost Competitiveness: Making recycled materials economically competitive with virgin materials is crucial for widespread adoption.
  • Quality and Consistency: Ensuring the quality and consistency of recycled materials is essential for maintaining product performance.
  • Scaling Up Technologies: Scaling up promising recycling technologies from the lab to industrial scale is a major challenge.
  • Consumer Acceptance: Building consumer trust in the safety and quality of products made with recycled content is important.

The future of R&D in this area will likely focus on:

  • Developing more efficient and cost-effective recycling technologies.
  • Creating new materials with enhanced properties and high recycled content.
  • Improving the recyclability of products and packaging.
  • Building a robust circular economy for materials.

By continuing to invest in research and development, we can overcome the challenges and unlock the full potential of recycled materials, creating a more sustainable future.

COURTESY : The National Desk

References

  1. ^ Villalba, G; Segarra, M; Fernández, A.I; Chimenos, J.M; Espiell, F (December 2002). “A proposal for quantifying the recyclability of materials”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 37 (1): 39–53. Bibcode:2002RCR….37…39V. doi:10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00056-3. ISSN 0921-3449.
  2. ^ Lienig, Jens; Bruemmer, Hans (2017). “Recycling Requirements and Design for Environmental Compliance”. Fundamentals of Electronic Systems Design. pp. 193–218. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55840-0_7. ISBN 978-3-319-55839-4.
  3. ^ European Commission (2014). “EU Waste Legislation”. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014.
  4. ^ Geissdoerfer, Martin; Savaget, Paulo; Bocken, Nancy M.P.; Hultink, Erik Jan (1 February 2017). “The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?” (PDF). Journal of Cleaner Production. 143: 757–768. Bibcode:2017JCPro.143..757G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048. S2CID 157449142. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t League of Women Voters (1993). The Garbage Primer. New York: Lyons & Burford. pp. 35–72. ISBN 978-1-55821-250-3.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b Lilly Sedaghat (4 April 2018). “7 Things You Didn’t Know About Plastic (and Recycling)”. National Geographic. Archived from the original on 25 January 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  7. ^ Aspden, Peter (9 December 2022). “Recycling Beauty, Prada Foundation — what the Romans did for us and what we did to them”. Financial Times. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Black Dog Publishing (2006). Recycle : a source book. London, UK: Black Dog Publishing. ISBN 978-1-904772-36-1.
  9. ^ Wood, J.R. (2022). “Approaches to interrogate the erased histories of recycled archaeological objects”. Archaeometry. 64: 187–205. doi:10.1111/arcm.12756. Archived from the original on 20 October 2022. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n “The truth about recycling”. The Economist. 7 June 2007. Archived from the original on 25 January 2009. Retrieved 8 September 2008.
  11. ^ Cleveland, Cutler J.; Morris, Christopher G. (15 November 2013). Handbook of Energy: Chronologies, Top Ten Lists, and Word Clouds. Elsevier. p. 461. ISBN 978-0-12-417019-3. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  12. ^ Dadd-Redalia, Debra (1 January 1994). Sustaining the earth: choosing consumer products that are safe for you, your family, and the earth. New York: Hearst Books. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-688-12335-2. OCLC 29702410.
  13. ^ Nongpluh, Yoofisaca Syngkon. (2013). Know all about : reduce, reuse, recycle. Noronha, Guy C.,, Energy and Resources Institute. New Delhi. ISBN 978-1-4619-4003-6. OCLC 858862026.
  14. ^ Carl A. Zimring (2005). Cash for Your Trash: Scrap Recycling in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-4694-0.
  15. ^ “sd_shire” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 October 2012. Retrieved 27 October 2012.
  16. ^ Rethinking economic incentives for separate collection Archived 19 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Zero Waste Europe & Reloop Platform, 2017
  17. ^ “Report: “On the Making of Silk Purses from Sows’ Ears,” 1921: Exhibits: Institute Archives & Special Collections: MIT”. mit.edu. Archived from the original on 3 June 2016.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b c “The War Episode 2: Rationing and Recycling”. Public Broadcasting System. 2007. Archived from the original on 23 February 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  19. ^ “Out of the Garbage-Pail into the Fire: fuel bricks now added to the list of things salvaged by science from the nation’s waste”. Popular Science monthly. Bonnier Corporation. February 1919. pp. 50–51. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023.
  20. ^ “Recycling through the ages: 1970s”. Plastic Expert. 30 July 2014. Archived from the original on 16 May 2019. Retrieved 7 March 2015.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e “The price of virtue”. The Economist. 7 June 2007. Archived from the original on 16 September 2009. Retrieved 8 September 2008.
  22. ^ “CRC History”. Computer Recycling Center. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  23. ^ “About us”. Swico Recycling. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  24. ^ “Where does e-waste end up?”. Greenpeace. 24 February 2009. Archived from the original on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  25. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinver, Mark (3 July 2007). “Mechanics of e-waste recycling”. BBC. Archived from the original on 3 May 2009. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  26. ^ “Bulgaria opens largest WEEE recycling factory in Eastern Europe”. www.ask-eu.com. WtERT Germany GmbH. 12 July 2010. Archived from the original on 14 September 2011. Retrieved 29 July 2015.“EnvironCom opens largest WEEE recycling facility”. www.greenwisebusiness.co.uk. The Sixty Mile Publishing Company. 4 March 2010. Archived from the original on 15 May 2016.Goodman, Peter S. (11 January 2012). “Where Gadgets Go To Die: E-Waste Recycler Opens New Plant in Las Vegas”. Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 8 January 2017. Retrieved 29 July 2015.[unreliable source?]Moses, Asher (19 November 2008). “New plant tackles our electronic leftovers”. Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 26 August 2017. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  27. ^ European Commission, Recycling Archived 3 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine.
  28. ^ “Recycling rates in Europe”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  29. ^ “Recycling of municipal waste”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  30. ^ Paben, Jared (7 February 2017). “Germany’s recycling rate continues to lead Europe”. Resource Recycling News. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  31. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  32. ^ Hook, Leslie; Reed, John (24 October 2018). “Why the world’s recycling system stopped working”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 25 October 2018. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  33. ^ “Electronic waste (e-waste)”. World Health Organization (WHO). 18 October 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
  34. ^ Patil T., Rebaioli L., Fassi I., “Cyber-physical systems for end-of-life management of printed circuit boards and mechatronics products in home automation: A review” Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2022.
  35. ^ Solomon Gabasiane, Tlotlo; Danha, Gwiranai; A. Mamvura, Tirivaviri; et al. (2021). Dang, Prof. Dr. Jie; Li, Dr. Jichao; Lv, Prof. Dr. Xuewei; Yuan, Prof. Dr. Shuang; Leszczyńska-Sejda, Dr. Katarzyna (eds.). “Environmental and Socioeconomic Impact of Copper Slag—A Review”. Crystals. 11 (12): 1504. doi:10.3390/cryst11121504. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  36. ^ Edraki, Mansour; Baumgarti, Thomas; Manlapig, Emmanuel; Bradshaw, Dee; M. Franks, Daniel; J. Moran, Chris (December 2014). “Designing mine tailings for better environmental, social and economic outcomes: a review of alternative approaches”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 84: 411–420. Bibcode:2014JCPro..84..411E. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.079 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  37. ^ Shen, Huiting; Forssberg (2003). “An overview of recovery of metals from slags”. Waste Management. 23 (10): 933–949. Bibcode:2003WaMan..23..933S. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00164-2. PMID 14614927.
  38. ^ Mahar, Amanullah; Wang, Ping; Ali, Amjad; Kumar Awasthi, Mukesh; Hussain Lahori, Altaf; Wang, Quan; Li, Ronghua; Zhang, Zengqiang (April 2016). “Challenges and opportunities in the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soils: A review”. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 126: 111–121. Bibcode:2016EcoES.126..111M. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.12.023. PMID 26741880 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  39. ^ Khalid, Sana; Shahid, Muhammad; Khan Niazi, Nabeel; Murtaza, Behzad; Bibi, Irshad; Dumat, Camille (November 2017). “A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils”. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 182 (Part B): 247–268. Bibcode:2017JCExp.182..247K. doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021.
  40. ^ “Slag Recycling”. Recovery Worldwide.
  41. ^ Landsburg, Steven E. (2012). “Why I Am Not An Environmentalist”. The Armchair Economist: Economics and Everyday Life. Simon and Schuster. pp. 279–290. ISBN 978-1-4516-5173-7. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 10 April 2021.
  42. ^ Steven E. Landsburg (May 2012). The Armchair Economist: Economics and Everyday Life. Simon and Schuster. p. 98. ISBN 978-1-4516-5173-7. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 10 April 2021.
  43. ^ Baird, Colin (2004). Environmental Chemistry (3rd ed.). W. H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-4877-0.[page needed]
  44. ^ de Jesus, Simeon (1975). “How to make paper in the tropics”. Unasylva. 27 (3). Archived from the original on 1 October 2018. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
  45. ^ UNFCCC (2007). “Investment and financial flows to address climate change” (PDF). unfccc.int. UNFCCC. p. 81. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 May 2008. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  46. ^ Towie, Narelle (28 February 2019). “Burning issue: are waste-to-energy plants a good idea?”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 23 December 2019.
  47. ^ “A Beverage Container Deposit Law for Hawaii”. www.opala.org. City & County of Honolulu, Department of Environmental Services. October 2002. Archived from the original on 22 August 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
  48. ^ European Council. “The Producer Responsibility Principle of the WEEE Directive” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  49. ^ “Regulatory Policy Center — Property Matters — James V. DeLong”. Archived from the original on 14 April 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  50. ^ Web-Dictionary.com (2013). “Recyclate”. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014.
  51. ^ Freudenrich, C. (2014) (14 December 2007). “How Plastics Work”. Archived from the original on 4 December 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f “Quality Action Plan Proposals to Promote High Quality Recycling of Dry Recyclates” (PDF). DEFRA. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 February 2017. Retrieved 4 November 2016.
  53. ^ “How to Recycle Tin or Steel Cans”. Earth911. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  54. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e “Recyclate Quality Action Plan – Consultation Paper”. The Scottish Government. 5 October 2012. Archived from the original on 2 February 2013.
  55. ^ Waldrop, M. Mitchell (1 October 2020). “One bin future: How mixing trash and recycling can work”. Knowable Magazine. doi:10.1146/knowable-092920-3. S2CID 224860591. Archived from the original on 18 October 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  56. ^ “The State of Multi-Tenant Recycling in Oregon” (PDF). April 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 26 May 2019.
  57. ^ Baechler, Christian; DeVuono, Matthew; Pearce, Joshua M. (2013). “Distributed Recycling of Waste Polymer into RepRap Feedstock”. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 19 (2): 118–125. doi:10.1108/13552541311302978. S2CID 15980607. Archived from the original on 2 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2017.
  58. ^ Kreiger, M.; Anzalone, G. C.; Mulder, M. L.; Glover, A.; Pearce, J. M. (2013). “Distributed Recycling of Post-Consumer Plastic Waste in Rural Areas”. MRS Online Proceedings Library. 1492: 91–96. doi:10.1557/opl.2013.258. ISSN 0272-9172. S2CID 18303920. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  59. ^ Kreiger, M.A.; Mulder, M.L.; Glover, A.G.; Pearce, J. M. (2014). “Life Cycle Analysis of Distributed Recycling of Post-consumer High Density Polyethylene for 3-D Printing Filament”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 70: 90–96. Bibcode:2014JCPro..70…90K. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.009. Archived from the original on 2 December 2021. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  60. ^ Insider Business (12 October 2021). Young Inventor Makes Bricks From Plastic Trash. World Wide Waste. Retrieved 26 February 2023 – via YouTube.
  61. ^ Kumar, Rishabh; Kumar, Mohit; Kumar, Inder; Srivastava, Deepa (2021). “A review on utilization of plastic waste materials in bricks manufacturing process”. Materials Today: Proceedings. 46: 6775–6780. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.337. S2CID 236599187.
  62. ^ Chauhan, S S; Kumar, Bhushan; Singh, Prem Shankar; Khan, Abuzaid; Goyal, Hritik; Goyal, Shivank (1 November 2019). “Fabrication and Testing of Plastic Sand Bricks”. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 691 (1): 012083. Bibcode:2019MS&E..691a2083C. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/691/1/012083. ISSN 1757-899X. S2CID 212846044.
  63. ^ Tsala-Mbala, Celestin; Hayibo, Koami Soulemane; Meyer, Theresa K.; Couao-Zotti, Nadine; Cairns, Paul; Pearce, Joshua M. (October 2022). “Technical and Economic Viability of Distributed Recycling of Low-Density Polyethylene Water Sachets into Waste Composite Pavement Blocks”. Journal of Composites Science. 6 (10): 289. doi:10.3390/jcs6100289. ISSN 2504-477X.
  64. ^ Samson, Sam (19 February 2023). “Single-use face masks get new life thanks to Regina engineer”. CBC.
  65. ^ “How recycling robots have spread across North America”. Resource Recycling News. 7 May 2019. Archived from the original on 8 May 2019. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  66. ^ “AMP Robotics announces largest deployment of AI-guided recycling robots”. The Robot Report. 27 June 2019. Archived from the original on 16 July 2019. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  67. ^ None, None (10 August 2015). “Common Recyclable Materials” (PDF). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 April 2013. Retrieved 2 February 2013.
  68. ^ “Recycling Without Sorting: Engineers Create Recycling Plant That Removes The Need To Sort”. ScienceDaily. 1 October 2007. Archived from the original on 31 August 2008.
  69. ^ “Sortation by the numbers”. Resource Recycling News. 1 October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 August 2019. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  70. ^ Goodship, Vannessa (2007). Introduction to Plastics Recycling. iSmithers Rapra Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84735-078-7.[page needed]
  71. ^ None, None. “What Happens to My Recycling?”. 1coast.com.au. Archived from the original on 11 August 2014. Retrieved 21 July 2014.
  72. ^ “Best Recycling Programs in the US & Around the World”. cmfg.com. Archived from the original on 12 May 2015. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  73. ^ “Mayor Lee Announces San Francisco Reaches 80 Percent Landfill Waste Diversion, Leads All Cities in North America”. San Francisco Department of the Environment. 5 October 2012. Archived from the original on 24 June 2014. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  74. ^ “UK statistics on waste – 2010 to 2012” (PDF). UK Government. 25 September 2014. p. 2 and 6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2017. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
  75. ^ Polymer modified cements and repair mortars. Daniels LJ, PhD thesis Lancaster University 1992
  76. ^ Jump up to:a b “Publications – International Resource Panel”. unep.org. Archived from the original on 11 November 2012. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  77. ^ “How Urban Mining Works”. Archived from the original on 11 July 2010. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
  78. ^ McDonald, N. C.; Pearce, J. M. (2010). “Producer Responsibility and Recycling Solar Photovoltaic Modules” (PDF). Energy Policy. 38 (11): 7041–7047. Bibcode:2010EnPol..38.7041M. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.023. hdl:1974/6122. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2019. Retrieved 18 August 2019.
  79. ^ Hogye, Thomas Q. “The Anatomy of a Computer Recycling Process” (PDF). California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 13 October 2014.
  80. ^ “Sweeep Kuusakoski – Resources – BBC Documentary”. www.sweeepkuusakoski.co.uk. Archived from the original on 30 November 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
  81. ^ “Sweeep Kuusakoski – Glass Recycling – BBC filming of CRT furnace”. www.sweeepkuusakoski.co.uk. Archived from the original on 30 November 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
  82. ^ Jump up to:a b The dark side of green energies documentary
  83. ^ Layton, Julia (22 April 2009). “”Eco”-plastic: recycled plastic”. Science.howstuffworks.com. Archived from the original on 27 May 2020. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  84. ^ Francisco José Gomes da Silva; Ronny Miguel Gouveia (18 July 2019). Cleaner Production: Toward a Better Future. Springer. p. 180. ISBN 978-3-03-023165-1. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
  85. ^ Timothy E. Long; John Scheirs (1 September 2005). Modern Polyesters: Chemistry and Technology of Polyesters and Copolyesters. John Wiley & Sons. p. 459. ISBN 978-0-470-09067-1. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
  86. ^ Werner, Debra (21 October 2019). “Made in Space to launch commercial recycler to space station”. SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  87. ^ Siegel, R. P. (7 August 2019). “Eastman advances two chemical recycling options”. GreenBiz. Archived from the original on 29 August 2019. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  88. ^ “RESEM A Leading Pyrolysis Plant Manufacturer”. RESEM Pyrolysis Plant. Archived from the original on 18 February 2013. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
  89. ^ Plastic Recycling codes Archived 21 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine, American Chemistry
  90. ^ About resin identification codes Archived 19 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine American Chemistry
  91. ^ “Recycling Symbols on Plastics – What Do Recycling Codes on Plastics Mean”. The Daily Green. 25 November 2008. Archived from the original on 24 August 2013. Retrieved 29 February 2012.
  92. ^ Unless otherwise indicated, this data is taken from The League of Women Voters (1993). The Garbage Primer. New York: Lyons & Burford. pp. 35–72. ISBN 978-1-55821-250-3., which attributes, “Garbage Solutions: A Public Officials Guide to Recycling and Alternative Solid Waste Management Technologies, as cited in Energy Savings from Recycling, January/February 1989; and Worldwatch 76 Mining Urban Wastes: The Potential for Recycling, April 1987.”
  93. ^ “Recycling metals — aluminium and steel”. Archived from the original on 16 October 2007. Retrieved 1 November 2007.
  94. ^ “UCO: Recycling”. Archived from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  95. ^ “From Waste to Jobs: What Achieving 75 Percent Recycling Means for California” (PDF). March 2014. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
  96. ^ “Recycling Benefits to the Economy”. all-recycling-facts.com. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  97. ^ Daniel K. Benjamin (2010). “Recycling myths revisited”. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
  98. ^ “A Recycling Revolution”. recycling-revolution.com. Archived from the original on 15 November 2020. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  99. ^ Lavee, Doron (26 November 2007). “Is Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Economically Efficient?”. Environmental Management. 40 (6): 926–943. Bibcode:2007EnMan..40..926L. doi:10.1007/s00267-007-9000-7. PMID 17687596. S2CID 40085245.
  100. ^ Vigso, Dorte (2004). “Deposits on single use containers — a social cost–benefit analysis of the Danish deposit system for single use drink containers”. Waste Management & Research. 22 (6): 477–87. Bibcode:2004WMR….22..477V. doi:10.1177/0734242X04049252. PMID 15666450. S2CID 13596709.
  101. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Gunter, Matthew (1 January 2007). “Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Household and Municipal Recycling?”. Econ Journal Watch. 4 (1): 83–111. Archived from the original on 11 December 2015. Alt URL Archived 15 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine
  102. ^ Jump up to:a b Howard Husock (23 June 2020). “The Declining Case for Municipal Recycling”. Foundation for Economic Education. Archived from the original on 2 December 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
  103. ^ Serena Ng and Angela Chen (29 April 2015). “Unprofitable Recycling Weighs On Waste Management”. Wall Street Journal.[permanent dead link]
  104. ^ Daniel K. Benjamin (2010). “Recycling and waste have $6.7 billion economic impact in Ohio” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 February 2017. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
  105. ^ “Much toxic computer waste lands in Third World”. USA Today. Associated Press. 25 February 2002. Archived from the original on 13 September 2007.
  106. ^ Gough, Neil (11 March 2002). “Garbage In, Garbage Out”. Time Magazine. Archived from the original on 9 November 2003.
  107. ^ Illegal dumping and damage to health and environment. CBC. Archived from the original on 9 November 2012.
  108. ^ Hogg, Max (15 May 2009). “Waste outshines gold as prices surge”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  109. ^ Desimone, Bonnie (21 February 2006). “Rewarding Recyclers, and Finding Gold in the Garbage”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 June 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2017.
  110. ^ Tracy, Ben (14 April 2024). “Critics call out plastics industry over “fraud of plastic recycling””. CBS News. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
  111. ^ Afterlife: An Essential Guide To Design For Disassembly, by Alex Diener
  112. ^ “Fact Sheets on Designing for the Disassembly and Deconstruction of Buildings”. epa.gov. EPA. 14 March 2016. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
  113. ^ Huesemann, Michael H. (2003). “The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 5 (1): 21–34. Bibcode:2003CTEP….5…21H. doi:10.1007/s10098-002-0173-8. S2CID 55193459.
  114. ^ Tierney, John (30 June 1996). “Recycling Is Garbage”. The New York Times. p. 3. Archived from the original on 6 December 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  115. ^ Rosenberg, Mike (23 April 2019). “Largest e-recycling fraud in U.S. history sends owners of Kent firm to prison”. The Seattle Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
  116. ^ Lynn R. Kahle; Eda Gurel-Atay, eds. (2014). Communicating Sustainability for the Green Economy. New York: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-3680-5.
  117. ^ Morris, Jeffrey (1 July 2005). “Comparative LCAs for Curbside Recycling Versus Either Landfilling or Incineration with Energy Recovery (12 pp)”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 10 (4): 273–284. Bibcode:2005IJLCA..10..273M. doi:10.1065/lca2004.09.180.10. S2CID 110948339.
  118. ^ Oskamp, Stuart (1995). “Resource Conservation and Recycling: Behavior and Policy”. Journal of Social Issues. 51 (4): 157–177. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01353.x.
  119. ^ Pimenteira, C.A.P.; Pereira, A.S.; Oliveira, L.B.; Rosa, L.P.; Reis, M.M.; Henriques, R.M. (2004). “Energy conservation and CO2 emission reductions due to recycling in Brazil”. Waste Management. 24 (9): 889–897. Bibcode:2004WaMan..24..889P. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.001. PMID 15504666.
  120. ^ Jump up to:a b Brown, M.T.; Buranakarn, Vorasun (2003). “Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 38 (1): 1–22. Bibcode:2003RCR….38….1B. doi:10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00093-9.
  121. ^ Jump up to:a b “Recycling paper and glass”, Energy Kid’s Page, U.S. Energy Information Administration, archived from the original on 25 October 2008
  122. ^ Decker, Ethan H.; Elliott, Scott; Smith, Felisa A.; Blake, Donald R.; Rowland, F. Sherwood (November 2000). “Energy and Material flow through the urban Ecosystem”. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 25 (1): 685–740. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.582.2325. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.685. OCLC 42674488.
  123. ^ “How does recycling save energy?”. Municipal Solid Waste: Frequently Asked Questions about Recycling and Waste Management. Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on 27 September 2006.
  124. ^ Margolis, Nancy (July 1997). “Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Aluminum Industry” (PDF). US Department of Energy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 August 2011.
  125. ^ Lerche, Jacqueline (2011). “The Recycling of Aluminum Cans Versus Plastic”. National Geographic Green Living. Demand Media. Archived from the original on 26 October 2011.
  126. ^ “By the Numbers”. Can Manufacturers Institute. Archived from the original on 19 August 2019.
  127. ^ Brunner, P. H. (1999). “In search of the final sink”. Environ. Sci. & Pollut. Res. 6 (1): 1. Bibcode:1999ESPR….6….1B. doi:10.1007/bf02987111. PMID 19005854. S2CID 46384723.
  128. ^ Landsburg, Steven E. The Armchair Economist. p. 86.
  129. ^ Selke 116[full citation needed]
  130. ^ Grosse, François; Mainguy, Gaëll (2010). “Is recycling ‘part of the solution’? The role of recycling in an expanding society and a world of finite resources”. S.A.P.I.EN.S. 3 (1): 1–17. Archived from the original on 5 April 2010. Retrieved 15 October 2010.
  131. ^ Sahni, S.; Gutowski, T. G. (2011). “Your scrap, my scrap! The flow of scrap materials through international trade” (PDF). IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST). pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/ISSST.2011.5936853. ISBN 978-1-61284-394-0. S2CID 2435609. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 December 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2012.
  132. ^ Lehmann, Steffen (15 March 2011). “Resource Recovery and Materials Flow in the City: Zero Waste and Sustainable Consumption as Paradigms in Urban Development”. Sustainable Development Law & Policy. 11 (1). Archived from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
  133. ^ Zaman, A. U.; Lehmann, S. (2011). “Challenges and opportunities in transforming a city into a ‘Zero Waste City'”. Challenges. 2 (4): 73–93. doi:10.3390/challe2040073.
  134. ^ Jump up to:a b Huesemann, M.; Huesemann, J. (2011). Techno-fix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment. New Society Publishers. p. 464. ISBN 978-0-86571-704-6. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  135. ^ Clark, Brett; Foster, John Bellamy (2009). “Ecological Imperialism and the Global Metabolic Rift: Unequal Exchange and the Guano/Nitrates Trade”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 50 (3–4): 311–334. doi:10.1177/0020715209105144. S2CID 154627746.
  136. ^ Foster, John Bellamy; Clark, Brett (2011). The Ecological Rift: Capitalisms War on the Earth. Monthly Review Press. p. 544. ISBN 978-1-58367-218-1. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023.
  137. ^ Alcott, Blake (2005). “Jevons’ paradox”. Ecological Economics. 54 (1): 9–21. Bibcode:2005EcoEc..54….9A. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020. hdl:1942/22574.
  138. ^ Tierney, John (30 June 1996). “Recycling is Garbage”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  139. ^ “The Five Most Dangerous Myths About Recycling”. Institute for Local Self-Reliance. 14 September 1996. Archived from the original on 29 May 2009. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  140. ^ “Markets for Recovered Glass”. National Service Center for Environmental Publications. US Environmental Protection Agency. December 1992. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023.
  141. ^ Bolen, Wallace P. (January 1998). “Sand and Gravel (Industrial)” (PDF). In National Minerals Information Center (ed.). Mineral Commodity Summaries. Silica Statistics and Information. U.S. Geological Survey. pp. 146–147. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 September 2006. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
  142. ^ Sepúlveda, Alejandra; Schluep, Mathias; Renaud, Fabrice G.; Streicher, Martin; Kuehr, Ruediger; Hagelüken, Christian; Gerecke, Andreas C. (2010). “A review of the environmental fate and effects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronic equipments during recycling: Examples from China and India”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 30 (1): 28–41. Bibcode:2010EIARv..30…28S. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.04.001.
  143. ^ “Too Good To Throw Away – Appendix A”. NRDC. 30 June 1996. Archived from the original on 24 January 2010. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  144. ^ “Mission Police Station” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2012.
  145. ^ Jump up to:a b c PBS NewsHour, 16 February 2010. Report on the Zabaleen
  146. ^ Medina, Martin (2000). “Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 31 (1): 51–69. Bibcode:2000RCR….31…51M. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.579.6981. doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(00)00071-9.
  147. ^ “The News-Herald – Scrap metal a steal”. Zwire.com. Retrieved 6 November 2012.[permanent dead link]
  148. ^ “Raids on Recycling Bins Costly To Bay Area”. NPR. 19 July 2008. Archived from the original on 11 August 2013. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  149. ^ Burn, Shawn (2006). “Social Psychology and the Stimulation of Recycling Behaviors: The Block Leader Approach”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 21 (8): 611–629. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.462.1934. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00539.x.
  150. ^ Oskamp, Stuart (1995). “Resource Conservation and Recycling: Behavior and Policy”. Journal of Social Issues. 51 (4): 157–177. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01353.x.
  151. ^ Recycling Rates of Metals: A status report. United Nations Environment Programme. 2011. ISBN 978-92-807-3161-3. Archived from the original on 10 January 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2021.
  152. ^ Moore, C. J. (2008). “Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: A rapidly increasing, long-term threat”. Environmental Research. 108 (2): 131–139. Bibcode:2008ER….108..131M. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.025. PMID 18949831. S2CID 26874262.
  153. ^ Schackelford, T.K. (2006). “Recycling, evolution and the structure of human personality”. Personality and Individual Differences. 41 (8): 1551–1556. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.020.
  154. ^ Pratarelli, Marc E. (4 February 2010). “Social pressure and recycling: a brief review, commentary and extensions”. S.A.P.I.EN.S. 3 (1). Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  155. ^ Chaudhuri, Saabira (19 December 2019). “Recycling Rethink: What to Do With Trash Now That China Won’t Take It”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
  156. ^ Negrete-Cardoso, Mariana; Rosano-Ortega, Genoveva; Álvarez-Aros, Erick Leobardo; Tavera-Cortés, María Elena; Vega-Lebrún, Carlos Arturo; Sánchez-Ruíz, Francisco Javier (1 September 2022). “Circular economy strategy and waste management: a bibliometric analysis in its contribution to sustainable development, toward a post-COVID-19 era”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29 (41): 61729–61746. Bibcode:2022ESPR…2961729N. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18703-3. ISSN 1614-7499. PMC 9170551. PMID 35668274.
  157. ^ K, J, P, Melati, Nikam, Nguyen. “arriers and drivers for enterprises to transition to a circular economy. Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden” (PDF). Arriers and Drivers for Enterprises to Transition to a Circular Economy. Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »