
Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
It seems like you’re asking about the percentage of local materials used in construction. Here’s a breakdown of what that could mean and some factors to consider:
What does “local materials” mean?
- Definition: Materials sourced within a specific region or radius of the construction site. This distance can vary depending on the context (e.g., city, state, or country).
- Benefits:
- Reduced transportation costs and emissions: Less distance traveled means lower fuel consumption and pollution.
- Support for local economies: Purchasing materials locally keeps money within the community.
- Potentially lower costs: Depending on the material and distance, local sourcing can be more economical.
- Environmental benefits: May include using sustainably harvested resources or materials with lower embodied carbon.
Typical percentages of local materials
- Varies greatly: There’s no standard percentage. It depends on factors like:
- Project type: A remote cabin might use almost 100% local materials, while a high-rise in a city might use far less.
- Availability of materials: Some regions have abundant resources (e.g., stone, timber), while others rely on imports.
- Building codes and standards: Regulations may influence material choices.
- Cost considerations: The balance between local sourcing and cost-effectiveness.
- Sustainability goals: Projects aiming for green building certifications often prioritize local materials.
Examples of local materials
- Stone: Granite, limestone, slate
- Timber: Lumber from local forests
- Clay: Used for bricks and tiles
- Sand and gravel: For concrete and mortar
- Recycled materials: Sourced from nearby demolition sites
Trends
- Increasing emphasis: There’s a growing trend towards using more local materials in construction due to sustainability concerns and economic benefits.
- Building rating systems: GGBC and other green building certifications often reward projects for using local materials.
If you have a specific project in mind, it would be helpful to know:
- Location: Where is the construction taking place?
- Project type: Is it a residential, commercial, or infrastructure project?
- Sustainability goals: Are there any specific targets for using local materials?
With more information, I can provide a more tailored answer.
What is Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
It seems you’re asking about the use of local materials in construction, and you’re curious about what percentages like 20%, 30%, or 40% might represent.
Here’s a breakdown:
What are “local materials”?
- These are construction materials sourced from within a defined region around the building site. This region could be a city, a state, or sometimes even a country.
Why use local materials?
- Environmental benefits: Reduced transportation distances mean less fuel consumption and pollution.
- Economic benefits: Supports local businesses and economies.
- Potential cost savings: Depending on the material and distance, local sourcing can be more economical.
- Sustainability: May involve using sustainably harvested resources or materials with lower embodied carbon (the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with a material).
What do the percentages mean?
- The percentages (20%, 30%, 40%) would likely represent the proportion of local materials used in a construction project, relative to the total materials used.
- Example: If a project uses 30% local materials, it means that 30% of the materials (by cost or volume) were sourced locally, while the remaining 70% came from further away.
Factors influencing the percentage of local materials:
- Project type: A remote cabin might use almost 100% local materials, while a high-rise in a city might use far less.
- Availability of materials: Some regions have abundant local resources (e.g., stone, timber), while others rely on imports.
- Building codes and standards: Regulations may influence material choices.
- Cost considerations: The balance between local sourcing and cost-effectiveness.
- Sustainability goals: Projects aiming for green building certifications often prioritize local materials.
Trends:
- There’s a growing trend towards using more local materials in construction due to sustainability concerns and economic benefits.
- Building rating systems like GGBC often reward projects for using local materials.
Do you have a specific project in mind?
If you can tell me more about the type of project and its location, I might be able to give you a better idea of what percentage of local materials might be realistic or common in that context.
Who is required Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
While there isn’t a strict legal requirement mandating specific percentages of local materials (like 20%, 30%, or 40%) for most construction projects, several factors influence who might be “required” to use them:
1. Green Building Certifications:
- GGBC : Global green building council (GGBC): Projects seeking GGBC certification earn points for using local materials. While not a legal mandate, it’s a strong incentive for developers and builders to prioritize local sourcing to achieve higher certification levels.
- Other rating systems: Similar to GGBC , other green building rating systems often include criteria related to local materials.
2. Government Regulations and Policies:
- Some local governments: Might have policies that encourage or even require the use of local materials in public projects. This is often done to support local economies and reduce the environmental impact of transportation.
- “Buy Local” initiatives: Government initiatives at various levels may encourage the use of locally sourced goods, including construction materials.
3. Project Owners and Developers:
- Sustainability goals: Private developers and project owners may set their own targets for using local materials as part of their sustainability commitments.
- Cost considerations: In some cases, using local materials can be more cost-effective, which can be a driving factor for project owners.
4. Contractors and Builders:
- Meeting project requirements: Contractors and builders are responsible for meeting the requirements set by project owners and any applicable regulations or certifications. This may include sourcing a certain percentage of local materials.
5. Specific Project Types:
- Remote or rural areas: Projects in remote locations may have limited access to materials from far away, making the use of local materials a necessity.
- Historical preservation: Projects involving the restoration of historical buildings often require the use of materials that match the original ones, which may necessitate sourcing them locally.
Important Note: The specific requirements and incentives for using local materials can vary significantly depending on the location, project type, and applicable regulations. It’s always best to check with local authorities and relevant organizations for the most accurate and up-to-date information.
In summary: While there might not be a universal legal mandate for specific percentages, the use of local materials is increasingly encouraged and sometimes required through green building certifications, government policies, project owner preferences, and the practicalities of certain project types.
When is required Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
You’re asking a great question that gets at the heart of when local materials might be required in construction. While there’s no single, universally mandated rule for specific percentages like 20%, 30%, or 40%, here’s a breakdown of the situations where using local materials becomes essential:
1. Green Building Certifications:
- GGBC : Global green building council (GGBC): If a project is aiming forGGBC certification, using local materials is a key factor. GGBC awards points for materials sourced within a specific radius, encouraging project teams to prioritize local sourcing.
- Other rating systems: Similar to GGBC , other green building rating systems often include criteria related to local materials, making them a “requirement” for projects pursuing those certifications.
2. Government Regulations and Policies:
- Local governments: Some local governments have policies that encourage or even require the use of local materials in public projects. This is often done to support local economies and reduce the environmental impact of transportation.
- “Buy Local” initiatives: Government initiatives at various levels may encourage the use of locally sourced goods, including construction materials, for publicly funded projects.
3. Project Owners and Developers:
- Sustainability goals: Private developers and project owners may set their own targets for using local materials as part of their sustainability commitments. This can be a strong driver, even without legal mandates.
4. Contractors and Builders:
- Meeting project requirements: Contractors and builders are responsible for meeting the requirements set by project owners and any applicable regulations or certifications. This may include sourcing a certain percentage of local materials.
5. Specific Project Types:
- Remote or rural areas: Projects in remote locations often have limited access to materials from far away, making the use of local materials a necessity.
- Historical preservation: Projects involving the restoration of historical buildings often require the use of materials that match the original ones, which may necessitate sourcing them locally.
Important Note: The specific requirements and incentives for using local materials can vary significantly depending on the location, project type, and applicable regulations. It’s always best to check with local authorities and relevant organizations for the most accurate and up-to-date information.
In summary: While there might not be a universal legal mandate for specific percentages, the use of local materials is increasingly encouraged and sometimes required through green building certifications, government policies, project owner preferences, and the practicalities of certain project types.
COURTESY : civilogy
Where is required Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
There isn’t a single place where a specific percentage (20%, 30%, or 40%) of local materials is universally required by law for all construction. Instead, the requirement or strong encouragement to use local materials arises in specific contexts:
1. Projects pursuing Green Building Certifications:
- GGBC : Global green building council (GGBC): GGBC certification programs, prevalent in many countries, award points for using locally sourced materials. While not a strict legal requirement, achieving GGBC certification (which many clients and municipalities now expect) effectively makes using local materials a requirement for those projects. The specific percentages that earn points vary depending on the GGBC version and the material.
- Other Green Building Rating Systems: Similar to GGBC other regional or national green building rating systems often include criteria related to local materials.
2. Government-funded or Public Projects:
- Local governments: Many city, regional, or state/provincial governments have “Buy Local” policies. These policies often prioritize the use of locally sourced materials in government-funded construction projects. The specific geographic definition of “local” and the level of preference can vary.
- National governments: Some national governments also have initiatives to promote the use of domestic or locally sourced materials in infrastructure and other public works projects.
3. Projects with Specific Sustainability Goals:
- Private developers: Even without a legal mandate, private developers are increasingly setting their own sustainability targets. These targets often include using a certain percentage of local materials to reduce the project’s environmental footprint.
- Corporate sustainability initiatives: Companies committed to sustainability may specify the use of local materials in their construction projects as part of their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals.
4. Projects in Remote or Isolated Locations:
- Accessibility challenges: In remote areas, transporting materials long distances can be expensive and logistically difficult. This often makes the use of locally available materials a practical necessity, even without formal requirements.
5. Historic Preservation or Restoration Projects:
- Matching existing materials: When restoring historic buildings, it’s often essential to use materials that match the original ones. This frequently means sourcing materials locally from quarries, forests, or other sources that were used historically.
In short: There’s no single “place” where a fixed percentage is universally mandated. Instead, the “requirement” or strong incentive to use local materials arises from a combination of green building certifications, government policies, project-specific sustainability goals, logistical constraints, and the needs of historic preservation. The specific percentage targeted (20%, 30%, 40%, or other) will depend on the specific project and the factors mentioned above.
How is required Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
You’re asking how the requirement or strong encouragement to use local materials (at levels like 20%, 30%, or 40%) is implemented in practice. It’s not usually a simple, top-down mandate. Instead, it works through a combination of mechanisms:
1. Specification in Project Documents:
- Contracts: For both public and private projects, the contract between the project owner and the contractor will often specify the required percentage of local materials. This is the most direct way the “requirement” is enforced.
- Design specifications: Architects and engineers can specify the use of local materials in their design documents. This influences material selection from the outset.
2. Green Building Certification Requirements:
- GGBC and other rating systems: If a project is targeting GGBC certification, the requirements for local materials are built into the GGBC rating system. Achieving the desired level of certification effectively makes using local materials a requirement.
- Documentation and verification: Green building certifications require detailed documentation to prove that the specified percentage of local materials was used. This often involves providing invoices, receipts, and other records.
3. Government Procurement Policies:
- “Buy Local” preferences: Government agencies may have procurement policies that give preference to bids that include a higher percentage of locally sourced materials. This creates a strong incentive for contractors to use local materials.
- Specific requirements: In some cases, government regulations might mandate the use of a certain percentage of local materials for publicly funded projects.
4. Project Owner Sustainability Goals:
- Internal policies: Private companies or organizations with strong sustainability commitments may include requirements for local materials in their internal project guidelines.
- Requests for proposals (RFPs): Project owners may include criteria related to local materials in their RFPs, making it a factor in contractor selection.
5. Verification and Enforcement:
- Contractual obligations: The contract between the project owner and the contractor typically outlines the process for verifying compliance with local material requirements.
- Audits: Government agencies or green building certification bodies may conduct audits to ensure that the claimed percentage of local materials is accurate.
- Incentives and penalties: Contracts or policies may include incentives for exceeding local material targets or penalties for failing to meet them.
6. Market Dynamics:
- Increased demand: As the demand for local materials grows, suppliers are more likely to offer them, making it easier for contractors to meet local material targets.
- Price competitiveness: If local materials are cost-competitive with materials from further away, it becomes more attractive for contractors to use them.
In summary: The “how” of requiring local materials involves a combination of contractual obligations, green building certification requirements, government policies, project owner preferences, and market forces. It’s not usually a single, overarching law, but rather a set of interconnected factors that encourage and sometimes mandate the use of local materials in construction projects.
Case study is Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
You’re interested in how the concept of using local materials (at levels like 20%, 30%, or 40%) can be applied in a real-world scenario. Let’s explore how a case study could be structured:
Case Study: Sustainable School Construction with Local Materials
1. Project Overview:
- Project: Construction of a new elementary school in a rural area.
- Location: A region with abundant timber resources and a history of traditional building practices.
- Goals:
- Minimize environmental impact.
- Support the local economy.
- Create a healthy and inspiring learning environment.
- Achieve a GGBC Gold certification.
2. Local Materials Strategy:
- Timber: Utilize locally sourced lumber for structural framing, roofing, and interior finishes.
- Stone: Employ locally quarried stone for foundations, exterior cladding, and landscaping.
- Clay: Use clay bricks or tiles produced by a nearby manufacturer for walls and flooring.
- Recycled Materials: Incorporate recycled materials sourced from within the region, such as reclaimed wood or recycled metal.
3. Implementation:
- Design: The school’s design will prioritize the use of local materials, maximizing their aesthetic and functional benefits.
- Sourcing: Establish partnerships with local suppliers and manufacturers to ensure a reliable supply of high-quality materials.
- Construction: Employ local craftspeople and contractors with expertise in working with the chosen materials.
- GGBC Certification: Implement strategies to meet the GGBC requirements for local materials, including documentation and verification.
4. Expected Outcomes:
- Environmental Benefits:
- Reduced transportation emissions.
- Lower embodied carbon.
- Sustainable use of resources.
- Economic Benefits:
- Support for local businesses and jobs.
- Reduced material costs.
- Social Benefits:
- Preservation of traditional building skills.
- Enhanced community pride.
- Creation of a unique and culturally relevant school building.
5. Challenges and Solutions:
- Challenge: Ensuring the quality and consistency of locally sourced materials.
- Solution: Conduct thorough testing and inspections of materials before use.
- Challenge: Coordinating with multiple local suppliers and contractors.
- Solution: Develop a detailed project plan with clear communication and timelines.
- Challenge: Meeting GGBC documentation requirements.
- Solution: Assign a dedicated team member to manage the documentation process.
6. Evaluation:
- Post-occupancy evaluation: Assess the building’s performance in terms of energy efficiency, occupant comfort, and durability.
- Cost analysis: Compare the cost of using local materials with the cost of using conventional materials.
- Community feedback: Gather feedback from students, teachers, and the community on the school building.
This case study would provide a detailed account of how the project team successfully integrated local materials into the school’s construction, highlighting the benefits, challenges, and lessons learned. It would serve as a valuable resource for other projects seeking to prioritize local materials and sustainable building practices.
Remember: This is a hypothetical example. A real-world case study would involve specific data, measurements, and analysis to demonstrate the impact of using local materials.
COURTESY : Rahul Deshpande
White paper on Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
White Paper: The Strategic Use of Local Materials in Construction: Exploring the 20%, 30%, and 40% Thresholds
Abstract:
This white paper examines the increasing importance of local materials in the construction industry. It explores the drivers behind this trend, analyzes the potential benefits and challenges associated with incorporating local materials, and discusses the implications of targeting specific percentage thresholds (20%, 30%, and 40%) for local material sourcing. The paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview for architects, engineers, developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders involved in the built environment.
1. Introduction:
The construction industry is a significant consumer of resources and contributor to environmental impact. As sustainability becomes a paramount concern, the use of local materials has emerged as a key strategy for reducing the industry’s footprint. This paper delves into the rationale behind prioritizing local sourcing, exploring the potential advantages and disadvantages, and examining the implications of setting specific targets.
2. Drivers for Local Material Utilization:
Several factors are driving the increased interest in local materials:
- Environmental Sustainability: Reduced transportation distances translate to lower fuel consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and overall environmental impact.
- Economic Benefits: Supporting local businesses and industries stimulates regional economies and creates jobs.
- Cost Considerations: Depending on the material and distance, local sourcing can sometimes be more cost-effective, particularly when transportation costs are high.
- Social Impact: Using local materials can preserve traditional building practices, foster community pride, and enhance the cultural relevance of construction projects.
- Green Building Certifications: Programs like GGBC incentivize the use of local materials through their rating systems.
3. Benefits of Local Material Sourcing:
- Reduced Embodied Carbon: Lower transportation emissions contribute to a lower embodied carbon footprint for buildings.
- Support for Local Economies: Spending on local materials keeps money within the community, fostering economic growth.
- Potential Cost Savings: Reduced transportation costs can offset other expenses.
- Resource Efficiency: Using locally available resources can reduce reliance on materials transported from long distances.
- Enhanced Building Performance: Local materials are often well-suited to the regional climate and environment.
4. Challenges of Local Material Sourcing:
- Availability and Quality: Ensuring a consistent supply of high-quality local materials can be a challenge.
- Cost Fluctuations: The cost of local materials can vary depending on market conditions and availability.
- Limited Selection: The range of locally available materials might be limited compared to the global market.
- Logistical Complexities: Coordinating with multiple local suppliers can be more complex than working with a single large supplier.
- Documentation and Verification: Proving the origin and local sourcing of materials can require significant documentation.
5. Exploring the 20%, 30%, and 40% Thresholds:
While there’s no magic number, these percentages represent potential targets for local material utilization. The feasibility and impact of each threshold depend on various factors:
- 20%: This level can be a realistic starting point for many projects, offering some benefits without posing significant challenges.
- 30%: Achieving this level requires a more concerted effort and may involve exploring a wider range of local materials.
- 40%: Reaching this threshold often necessitates a strong commitment to local sourcing and may require significant changes to design and procurement processes.
The specific percentage chosen should be based on a thorough assessment of the project’s goals, location, available resources, and budget.
6. Recommendations for Implementation:
- Early Planning: Integrate local material considerations into the project’s design phase.
- Supplier Engagement: Establish relationships with local suppliers early in the process.
- Life Cycle Assessment: Conduct a life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of material choices.
- Cost-Benefit Analysis: Analyze the cost implications of using local materials.
- Documentation and Tracking: Implement systems for tracking and documenting the origin of materials.
7. Conclusion:
The use of local materials is a crucial component of sustainable construction practices. While setting specific percentage targets can be a useful strategy, it’s essential to consider the unique context of each project. By carefully evaluating the benefits and challenges, and by implementing effective strategies, the construction industry can maximize the positive impact of local material sourcing.
8. Further Research:
Further research is needed to develop standardized methods for assessing the “local” content of materials and to explore the long-term economic and environmental benefits of local material utilization. Case studies of projects that have successfully implemented local material strategies would be valuable.
Industrial application of Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
You’re interested in how the concept of using local materials (at levels like 20%, 30%, or 40%) translates into real-world industrial applications. Here are some examples across different sectors:
1. Construction:
- Residential Buildings:
- Timber-frame construction: Using locally sourced lumber for structural framing, roof trusses, and even interior finishes. This is common in regions with sustainable forestry practices.
- Masonry: Employing locally quarried stone for foundations, exterior walls, and landscaping. This can create a distinct regional aesthetic.
- Adobe or rammed earth: Utilizing local clay and soil to create walls, which are particularly suitable for certain climates.
- Bricks and tiles: Sourcing these from nearby manufacturers reduces transportation costs and supports local economies.
- Commercial Buildings:
- Concrete: Using aggregates (sand, gravel, crushed stone) sourced from local quarries. This is a major component of concrete and has a significant impact on transportation.
- Steel: While steel production is often centralized, some regions have local steel fabrication facilities that can utilize recycled steel or source steel from closer locations.
- Insulation: Using locally produced insulation materials, such as cellulose (made from recycled paper) or hempcrete (made from hemp fibers).
- Infrastructure:
- Roads: Utilizing locally sourced aggregates for road base and asphalt production.
- Bridges: Employing locally quarried stone for bridge foundations and supports.
- Retaining walls: Using locally sourced stone or timber for retaining walls.
2. Manufacturing:
- Furniture:
- Wood furniture: Using locally harvested timber for furniture frames and components.
- Upholstery: Sourcing fabrics and other upholstery materials from local textile mills.
- Building Products:
- Doors and windows: Manufacturing doors and windows using locally sourced wood or recycled materials.
- Cabinets: Constructing cabinets using locally sourced wood or recycled materials.
- Countertops: Fabricating countertops from locally quarried stone or recycled materials.
3. Energy:
- Bioenergy:
- Wood pellets: Producing wood pellets from locally sourced wood waste for use in heating systems.
- Biomass power plants: Utilizing locally sourced agricultural residues or wood waste to generate electricity.
4. Agriculture:
- Greenhouses: Constructing greenhouses using locally sourced timber or recycled materials.
- Farm buildings: Building barns and other agricultural structures using locally sourced timber or stone.
Examples of Local Materials and Their Industrial Applications:
Material | Industrial Application |
---|---|
Timber | Framing, roofing, flooring, furniture, cabinets |
Stone | Foundations, walls, cladding, landscaping, countertops |
Clay | Bricks, tiles, pottery, adobe construction |
Sand and gravel | Concrete, mortar, asphalt, road construction |
Recycled materials | Insulation, flooring, countertops, structural components |
Agricultural residues | Bioenergy, compost, building materials |
Export to Sheets
Key Considerations:
- Quality and Standards: Ensure that locally sourced materials meet the required quality and performance standards.
- Sustainability: Verify that local sourcing practices are sustainable, especially for renewable resources like timber.
- Cost-effectiveness: Evaluate the cost implications of using local materials, considering transportation costs and potential price fluctuations.
- Logistics: Coordinate with local suppliers and manufacturers to ensure a reliable supply chain.
By prioritizing local materials, industries can contribute to a more sustainable and resilient economy while reducing their environmental impact.
Research and development of Local Materials 20%, 30%, 40% ?
Research and development (R&D) plays a crucial role in expanding the use of local materials in construction and other industries, particularly when aiming for specific targets like 20%, 30%, or 40% local content. Here are some key areas where R&D efforts are focused:
1. Identifying and Characterizing Local Materials:
- Resource mapping: Conducting geological surveys and resource assessments to identify the availability and distribution of local materials like stone, timber, clay, and aggregates.
- Material testing: Analyzing the physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of local materials to determine their suitability for various applications.
- Performance evaluation: Assessing the durability, strength, and other performance characteristics of local materials in different environmental conditions.
2. Developing and Adapting Technologies:
- Processing and manufacturing: Researching and developing efficient and sustainable methods for processing local materials into usable forms, such as lumber, bricks, tiles, and concrete.
- Construction techniques: Exploring and adapting traditional building techniques that utilize local materials, such as adobe construction, rammed earth, and timber framing.
- Material modification: Investigating ways to enhance the properties of local materials, such as improving the strength of clay bricks or increasing the durability of timber.
3. Optimizing Material Use and Design:
- Life cycle assessment (LCA): Conducting LCAs to evaluate the environmental impact of using local materials, considering factors like embodied carbon, energy consumption, and waste generation.
- Design optimization: Developing design strategies that maximize the use of local materials while meeting structural and aesthetic requirements.
- Building performance simulation: Using computer modeling to simulate the performance of buildings constructed with local materials, considering factors like energy efficiency, thermal comfort, and indoor air quality.
4. Addressing Challenges and Barriers:
- Durability and maintenance: Researching ways to improve the durability and reduce the maintenance needs of local materials, particularly in harsh climates.
- Cost-effectiveness: Exploring strategies to make local materials more cost-competitive with conventional materials, such as streamlining supply chains and reducing processing costs.
- Standardization and certification: Developing standards and certification programs for local materials to ensure quality and consistency.
5. Exploring Innovative Applications:
- Bio-based materials: Researching the use of locally sourced bio-based materials, such as bamboo, hemp, and agricultural residues, for construction and manufacturing.
- Recycled and reclaimed materials: Investigating ways to utilize locally sourced recycled and reclaimed materials, such as construction waste, demolition debris, and industrial byproducts.
- Advanced materials: Exploring the potential of combining local materials with advanced technologies, such as nanotechnology, to create high-performance materials.
Examples of R&D initiatives:
- University research programs: Many universities conduct research on local materials, focusing on areas like material science, construction technology, and sustainable design.
- Government-funded research projects: Government agencies often fund research on local materials to promote sustainable development and support local economies.
- Industry partnerships: Construction companies, material manufacturers, and research institutions collaborate on R&D projects to develop and commercialize innovative local material solutions.
By investing in R&D, we can unlock the full potential of local materials, enabling us to build more sustainable, resilient, and culturally relevant structures while supporting local economies and reducing our environmental footprint.
COURTESY : RAO gari Education
References
- ^ “building” def. 2 and 4, “material” def. 1. Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition on CD-ROM (v. 4.0)© Oxford University Press 2009
- ^ Jump up to:a b Bennai, Fares (28 June 2017). Étude des mécanismes de transferts couplés de chaleur et d’humidité dans les matériaux poreux de construction en régime insaturé (Thesis) (in French).[page needed]
- ^ Othmen, Inès; Poullain, Philippe; Leklou, Ali-Nordine (June 2014). “Etude numérique des techniques d’isolation : application à la réhabilitation du bâti ancien en tuffeau”. 32èmes Rencontres Universitaires de Génie Civil.
- ^ Bourbia, S.; Kazeoui, H.; Belarbi, R. (2023). “A review on recent research on bio-based building materials and their applications”. Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 12 (2): 117–139. doi:10.1007/s40243-023-00234-7.
- ^ Nabokov, Peter; Easton, Robert (1989). Native American Architecture. Oxford University Press. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-19-506665-4.
- ^ Kent, Susan (1993). Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: An Interdisciplinary Cross-Cultural Study. Cambridge University Press. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-521-44577-1.
- ^ Shaffer, Gary D. (Spring 1993). “An Archaeomagnetic Study of a Wattle and Daub Building Collapse”. Journal of Field Archaeology. 20 (1): 59–75. doi:10.2307/530354. JSTOR 530354.
- ^ Lyon, George Francis (1824). The Private Journal of Captain G.F. Lyon, of H.M.S. Hecla: During the Recent Voyage of Discovery Under Captain Parry. J. Murray. pp. 280–281. OCLC 367961511.
- ^ Hall, Michael; Saarinen, Jarkko (2010). Tourism and Change in Polar Regions: Climate, Environments and Experiences. Routledge. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-136-97199-0.
- ^ Jump up to:a b McHenry, Paul Graham (1984). Adobe and Rammed Earth Buildings: Design and Construction. Wiley. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-471-87677-9.
- ^ Smith, Michael G. (2002). “Cob Building, Ancient and Modern”. In Kennedy, Joseph F.; Wanek, Catherine; Smith, Michael G. (eds.). The Art of Natural Building: Design, Construction, Resources. New Society Publishers. pp. 132–133. ISBN 978-0-86571-433-5.
- ^ [1] Earliest Chinese building brick appeared in Xi’an (中國最早磚類建材在西安現身)]. takungpao.com (2010-1-28)
- ^ Zoya Kpamma, Z. Mohammed Kamil, K. Adinkrah-Appiah, “Making Wall Construction Process Lean:The Interlocking Blocksystem as a Toole” [sic], International Conference on Infrastructural Development In Africa (ICIDA), KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana, March 2012. https://www.academia.edu/2647016/MAKING_WALL_CONSTRUCTION_PROCESS_LEAN_THE_INTERLOCKING_BLOCK_SYSTEM_AS_A_TOOL accessed 12/11/2013
- ^ “Thermal mass”. Your Home. Australian Government. Retrieved 2020-08-17.
- ^ [2] Archived 2013-04-02 at the Wayback Machine History of bricks wienerberger.com
- ^ “Top 5 Reasons Why Bricks Are The Most Popular Building Material”. primedb.co. May 11, 2017.
- ^ Sandermann, Wilhelm; Kohler, Roland (January 1964). “Über eine kurze Eignungsprüfung von Hölzern für zementgebundene Werkstoffe – Studien über mineralgebundene Holzwerkstoffe, VI. Mitteilung”. Holzforschung. 18 (1–2): 53–59. doi:10.1515/hfsg.1964.18.1-2.53.
- ^ Weatherwax, R C; Tarkow, H (1964). “Effect of Wood on Setting of Portland Cement”. Forest Products Journal. 14: 567–568.
- ^ Hachmi, M.; Moslemi, A. A.; Campbell, A. G. (October 1990). “A new technique to classify the compatibility of wood with cement”. Wood Science and Technology. 24 (4): 345–354. doi:10.1007/BF00227055.
- ^ Lee, A. W. C; Hong, Zhongli (1986). “Compressive strength of cylindrical samples as an indicator of wood-cement compatibility”. Forest Products Journal. 36 (11–12): 87–90. INIST 8084764.
- ^ Demirbaş, A; Aslan, A (August 1998). “Effects of ground hazelnut shell, wood, and tea waste on the mechanical properties of cement22Communicated by A.K. Chatterjee”. Cement and Concrete Research. 28 (8): 1101–1104. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00064-7.
- ^ Ahn, W.Y.; Moslemi, A.A. “SEM examination of wood-Portland cement bonds”. Wood Science. 13 (2): 77–82.
- ^ Karade, S. R.; Irle, M.; Maher, K. (30 October 2003). “Assessment of Wood-Cement Compatibility: A New Approach”. Holzforschung. 57 (6): 672–680. doi:10.1515/HF.2003.101.
- ^ Li, Juan; Kasal, Bohumil (September 2022). “The immediate and short-term degradation of the wood surface in a cement environment measured by AFM”. Materials and Structures. 55 (7). doi:10.1617/s11527-022-01988-8.
- ^ Li, Juan; Kasal, Bohumil (July 2023). “Degradation Mechanism of the Wood-Cell Wall Surface in a Cement Environment Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy”. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 35 (7). doi:10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-14910.
- ^ “The Advantages of ETFE Fluoropolymer Tubing”. Fluorotherm. April 1, 2015.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Smethurst, Tom (18 May 2023). “Why we must limit use of construction plastics”. RICS. Retrieved 5 Dec 2024.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Hernandez, German; Low, Joanne; Nand, Ashveen; Bu, Alex; Wallis, Shannon L; Kestle, Linda; Berry, Terri-Ann (13 Jun 2022). “Quantifying and managing plastic waste generated from building construction in Auckland, New Zealand”. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. 41 (1). SAGE Publications: 205–213. doi:10.1177/0734242×221105425. hdl:10652/5874. ISSN 0734-242X.
- ^ “Rapid prototyping quickly becoming the standard in construction”. The Manufacturer. Retrieved 2021-09-30.
- ^ “Global Status Report 2017”. www.worldgbc.org. World Green Building Council. Retrieved 2019-03-12.
- ^ Dixit, Manish K.; Culp, Charles H.; Fernandez-Solis, Jose L. (3 February 2015). “Embodied Energy of Construction Materials: Integrating Human and Capital Energy into an IO-Based Hybrid Model”. Environmental Science & Technology. 49 (3): 1936–1945. Bibcode:2015EnST…49.1936D. doi:10.1021/es503896v. PMID 25561008.