Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models forBuilding Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Noncooled Structures

Leave a Comment / Blog / By

Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models forBuilding Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Noncooled Structures ?

When considering “least energy productivity gauge models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures (Case 2), the focus shifts significantly from active cooling loads to passive strategies. Here’s a breakdown of key considerations and relevant models:

Understanding Non-Cooled Structures

  • Passive Design:
    • The primary goal is to minimize energy consumption through architectural design, material selection, and natural environmental factors.
    • This involves optimizing natural ventilation, daylighting, and thermal mass.
  • Key Factors:
    • Climate: Temperature variations, solar radiation, wind patterns, and humidity.
    • Building orientation: Maximizing or minimizing solar gain.
    • Material properties: Thermal conductivity, heat capacity, and solar reflectance.
    • Natural ventilation: Airflow patterns for cooling and ventilation.

Relevant Models and Considerations

  1. Thermal Performance Modeling:
    • These models assess how heat flows through the building envelope.
    • Key metrics:
      • U-value (thermal transmittance): Measures heat transfer through building materials.
      • R-value (thermal resistance): Measures a material’s resistance to heat flow.
    • Tools:
      • Building energy simulation software (e.g., EnergyPlus) can model heat transfer and assess the impact of different envelope designs.
      • Simplified calculations based on material properties and climate data.
  2. Solar Gain Analysis:
    • Evaluating the impact of solar radiation on building temperature.
    • Key factors:
      • Solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC): Measures how much solar radiation passes through windows.
      • Building orientation and shading: Controlling direct solar exposure.
    • Tools:
      • Solar analysis software can simulate solar radiation patterns and assess the effectiveness of shading devices.
  3. Natural Ventilation Modeling:
    • Analyzing airflow patterns for passive cooling.
    • Key factors:
      • Wind speed and direction.
      • Building geometry and openings.
      • Stack effect: Utilizing temperature differences to drive airflow.
    • Tools:
      • Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software can simulate airflow patterns.
  4. Thermal Mass Analysis:
    • Evaluating the ability of building materials to absorb and release heat.
    • Key factors:
      • Material density and heat capacity.
      • Diurnal temperature variations.
    • This is very important in non cooled structures.
  5. Focus on the Building Envelope:
    • Thermal bridges: areas of the building envelope with significantly higher heat transfer than the surrounding materials.
    • Insulation: The amount and placement of insulation is extremely important.
    • Air sealing: reducing unwanted air infiltration.

Key Strategies for Non-Cooled Structures

  • High Thermal Mass: Utilize materials like concrete, brick, or adobe to stabilize indoor temperatures.
  • Effective Insulation: Minimize heat transfer through walls, roofs, and floors.
  • Strategic Shading: Use overhangs, louvers, or vegetation to block direct solar radiation.
  • Optimized Natural Ventilation: Design for cross-ventilation and stack ventilation.
  • High Solar Reflectance: Use light-colored materials to reduce solar heat absorption.

By focusing on these passive design strategies and utilizing appropriate modeling tools, you can optimize the building envelope for minimal energy consumption in non-cooled structures.

What is Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models forBuilding Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Noncooled Structures ?

When discussing “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures, we’re essentially looking at methods to evaluate how well a building’s shell performs in minimizing energy needs without relying on active cooling systems. This is heavily reliant on passive design principles. Here’s a breakdown:

Core Concepts:

  • Passive Design:
    • This is the foundation. It prioritizes using the building’s architecture, materials, and site to control indoor temperatures.
    • Key elements:
      • Thermal mass: Ability to store and release heat.
      • Natural ventilation: Airflow for cooling.
      • Solar control: Managing solar heat gain.
      • Insulation: Reducing heat transfer.
  • Gauge Models:
    • In this context, “gauge models” refer to the methods and metrics used to assess the effectiveness of the building envelope.
    • They help quantify how well the envelope performs in relation to energy efficiency.

Key Models and Metrics:

  • Thermal Performance Metrics:
    • U-value:
      • Measures how much heat passes through a material. Lower is better.
    • R-value:
      • Measures a material’s resistance to heat flow. Higher is better.
    • These metrics are vital for assessing insulation effectiveness.
  • Solar Analysis:
    • Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC):
      • Indicates how much solar radiation enters through windows.
    • Shading Analysis:
      • Evaluating the effectiveness of overhangs, vegetation, and other shading devices.
    • Software tools are often used to simulate solar radiation and shading.
  • Natural Ventilation Assessment:
    • Airflow Modeling:
      • Using tools like computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate airflow patterns.
    • Air Change Rate:
      • Measuring how often the air in a space is replaced.
  • Thermal Mass Evaluation:
    • Analyzing the heat capacity and thermal conductivity of building materials.
    • Simulating temperature fluctuations to assess the stabilizing effect of thermal mass.
  • Building Energy Modeling (BEM):
    • Software like EnergyPlus allows for comprehensive simulations of building performance, considering all relevant factors.
    • BEM allows for the combined affects of all of the individual metrics to be analysed.
  • Thermal Bridging Analysis:
    • Identifying and quantifying areas of increased heat transfer in the building envelope.

Focus in Non-Cooled Structures:

  • The emphasis shifts from active cooling loads to:
    • Preventing excessive heat gain in hot climates.
    • Retaining heat in cold climates.
    • Maximizing natural ventilation for comfort.

In essence, these “gauge models” are tools and metrics that help designers and builders understand and optimize the building envelope for minimal energy use in environments where active cooling is not employed.

Who is required Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non cooled Structures ?

The need for “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures extends across a variety of stakeholders within the construction and building management sectors. Here’s a breakdown of who benefits and why:

Key Stakeholders:

  • Architects and Building Designers:
    • They are responsible for the initial design of buildings, and therefore, must understand how to optimize the building envelope for passive performance.
    • These models help them make informed decisions about:
      • Building orientation.
      • Material selection.
      • Window placement and shading.
      • Natural ventilation strategies.
  • Building Engineers:
    • Especially those specializing in building physics and sustainability, they use these models to:
      • Perform detailed energy simulations.
      • Analyze thermal performance.
      • Ensure compliance with energy efficiency standards.
  • Construction Companies:
    • They need to understand how to properly construct the building envelope to achieve the desired energy performance.
    • This includes:
      • Proper insulation installation.
      • Air sealing.
      • Avoiding thermal bridges.
  • Building Owners and Developers:
    • They are concerned with the long-term operating costs of their buildings.
    • These models help them:
      • Reduce energy consumption.
      • Improve occupant comfort.
      • Increase property value.
  • Government and Regulatory Bodies:
    • They set building codes and energy efficiency standards.
    • These models provide a basis for:
      • Developing and enforcing regulations.
      • Promoting sustainable building practices.
  • Researchers and Academics:
    • They use these models to:
      • Advance the understanding of building physics.
      • Develop new energy-efficient building technologies.
  • Sustainability Consultants:
    • They use these models to help clients achieve sustainability goals, and to certify buildings under various green building rating systems.

Why it’s Important:

  • In non-cooled structures, the building envelope is the primary determinant of indoor comfort.
  • These models enable accurate predictions of building performance, allowing for optimization before construction.
  • They contribute to:
    • Reduced energy consumption.
    • Lower greenhouse gas emissions.
    • Improved indoor air quality.

In essence, anyone involved in the design, construction, or management of buildings, particularly in climates where passive design is crucial, needs these “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models.”

When is required Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non cooled Structures ?

The application of “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures is crucial at several key stages of a building’s lifecycle. Here’s a breakdown of when these models are most required:

1. Design Phase (Conceptual & Schematic Design):

  • Early-Stage Analysis:
    • This is the most critical time. Architects and designers need to assess the potential energy performance of different design options.
    • Models help determine optimal:
      • Building orientation.
      • Form and massing.
      • Window-to-wall ratios.
      • Shading strategies.
  • Material Selection:
    • Gauge models inform the selection of appropriate building materials based on their thermal properties (R-value, U-value, thermal mass).
  • Natural Ventilation Planning:
    • Simulations are used to analyze airflow patterns and ensure effective natural ventilation.

2. Design Development & Construction Documents:

  • Detailed Performance Analysis:
    • Refined models are used to provide more accurate predictions of energy performance.
    • Thermal bridging analysis is conducted to identify and mitigate potential heat loss/gain.
  • Compliance Verification:
    • In many regions, building codes require energy performance assessments. Gauge models are used to demonstrate compliance.

3. Construction Phase:

  • Quality Control:
    • On-site inspections verify that the building envelope is constructed according to the design specifications.
    • This ensures that the intended energy performance is achieved.

4. Post-Construction & Operation:

  • Performance Monitoring:
    • After the building is occupied, energy performance can be monitored to identify any discrepancies between predicted and actual performance.
    • This allows for adjustments to be made to optimize energy efficiency.
  • Retrofit Analysis:
    • When considering renovations or upgrades to existing non-cooled structures, these models are used to evaluate the potential energy savings of different retrofit options.

Key Considerations:

  • Climate: The need for these models is particularly acute in climates with extreme temperature variations.
  • Building Type: The complexity of the building and its intended use will influence the level of detail required in the analysis.
  • Sustainability Goals: Growing awareness of environmental issues is driving increased demand for energy-efficient buildings.

In summary, these models are essential throughout the entire building lifecycle, from initial design to ongoing operation, to ensure that non-cooled structures perform optimally.

COURTESY : Energy Step Code

Where is required Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non cooled Structures ?

The application of “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures is relevant across a wide range of geographical and building contexts. However, their importance is heightened in specific scenarios:

Geographical Locations:

  • Climates with Extreme Temperature Variations:
    • Regions with hot, arid climates or those with significant diurnal temperature swings heavily rely on passive design.
    • Also, regions with very cold climates, where retaining heat is vital.
  • Areas with High Solar Radiation:
    • Locations with abundant sunshine require careful management of solar heat gain.
  • Regions with Variable Wind Patterns:
    • Where natural ventilation is a key cooling strategy, understanding local wind patterns is essential.

Building Contexts:

  • Residential Buildings:
    • Homes, especially those in rural or remote areas, often benefit from passive design.
  • Commercial Buildings:
    • Warehouses, storage facilities, and certain industrial buildings may prioritize non-cooled strategies.
  • Educational and Community Buildings:
    • Schools, libraries, and community centers can utilize passive design to reduce energy costs.
  • Agricultural Buildings:
    • Barns, greenhouses, and other agricultural structures rely on natural ventilation and thermal control.
  • Historical Buildings:
    • When retrofitting older buildings, passive design principles can be used to improve energy efficiency while preserving architectural integrity.
  • Any Building where sustainability is a priority:
    • Those who are pursuing green building certifications, or those who want to minimize their carbon footprint.

Specific Situations:

  • Off-Grid Locations:
    • In areas without access to reliable electricity, passive design is crucial.
  • Areas with Limited Resources:
    • Where energy costs are high, or resources are scarce, minimizing energy consumption is essential.
  • Projects Focused on Sustainable Design:
    • Any project that aims to minimize environmental impact.

In essence, these models are required anywhere that optimizing a buildings thermal performance, without the use of active cooling systems, is required.

How is required Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non cooled Structures ?

The implementation of “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures involves a systematic and multi-faceted approach. Here’s a breakdown of how it’s done:

1. Data Collection and Climate Analysis:

  • Gathering Climate Data:
    • This includes temperature variations, solar radiation, wind patterns, and humidity levels for the specific location.
    • Data is obtained from meteorological sources.
  • Site Analysis:
    • Evaluating the building’s orientation, surrounding environment, and potential shading from nearby structures or vegetation.

2. Material Property Assessment:

  • Thermal Properties:
    • Determining the R-values and U-values of building materials.
    • Analyzing the thermal mass (heat capacity) of materials.
  • Solar Reflectance:
    • Measuring the ability of materials to reflect solar radiation.

3. Modeling and Simulation:

  • Thermal Modeling:
    • Using software tools to simulate heat transfer through the building envelope.
    • This allows for the evaluation of insulation effectiveness and thermal bridging.
  • Solar Gain Analysis:
    • Employing software to model solar radiation patterns and assess the impact of shading devices.
    • Calculating the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) for windows.
  • Natural Ventilation Modeling:
    • Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to simulate airflow patterns and assess the effectiveness of natural ventilation strategies.
  • Building Energy Modeling (BEM):
    • Using software like EnergyPlus, to combine all of the above factors, and to give a whole building analysis.

4. Performance Evaluation:

  • Metric Analysis:
    • Analyzing key metrics such as U-values, R-values, SHGC, and air change rates.
  • Performance Simulation:
    • Simulating the building’s thermal performance under various climate conditions.
  • Optimization:
    • Using the data from the simulations to optimize the building envelope design.

5. Implementation and Verification:

  • Construction Quality Control:
    • Ensuring that the building envelope is constructed according to the design specifications.
  • Post-Occupancy Evaluation:
    • Monitoring the building’s energy performance after it is occupied to verify that it meets the design goals.

Key Tools and Technologies:

  • Building Energy Simulation Software:
    • EnergyPlus, IES VE, etc.
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Software:
    • For analyzing airflow patterns.
  • Solar Analysis Software:
    • For simulating solar radiation.
  • Thermal Imaging:
    • To identify thermal bridges and air leakage.

By following these steps and utilizing the appropriate tools, professionals can effectively apply “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” to optimize building envelope design for non-cooled structures.

Case study is Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non cooled Structures ?

When examining case studies related to “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for non-cooled structures, the focus is typically on how passive design principles and building envelope optimization are applied in real-world scenarios. Here’s what such case studies often entail:

Key Aspects of Case Studies:

  • Climate-Specific Design:
    • Case studies often highlight projects in climates where passive design is essential, such as:
      • Arid regions: Demonstrating how thermal mass, shading, and natural ventilation are used to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures.
      • Cold regions: Showing how insulation, solar gain, and air sealing minimize heat loss.
  • Building Type Variations:
    • Examples include:
      • Residential buildings: Showcasing how homes are designed to maximize natural ventilation and minimize solar heat gain.
      • Agricultural buildings: Illustrating how barns and greenhouses are optimized for natural ventilation and thermal control.
      • Educational buildings: Showing how schools are designed to provide comfortable learning environments without active cooling.
  • Material and Technology Applications:
    • Case studies may focus on:
      • The use of high thermal mass materials like adobe or rammed earth.
      • The implementation of advanced insulation techniques.
      • The design of innovative natural ventilation systems.
      • The use of high solar reflectance materials on roofs and walls.
  • Performance Monitoring and Evaluation:
    • Effective case studies include data on:
      • Measured indoor temperatures.
      • Energy consumption (if any).
      • Occupant comfort levels.
      • Analysis of the effectiveness of the implemented design strategies.
  • Thermal Bridging Mitigation:
    • Case studies that show how thermal bridges were identified, and mitigated.
  • Software and Modeling:
    • Showing how building energy modeling software was used in the design process.

Where to Find Relevant Case Studies:

  • Academic Journals:
    • Publications on sustainable building design and energy efficiency often feature detailed case studies.
  • Research Institutions:
    • Organizations focused on building science and renewable energy conduct research and publish case studies.
  • Government Agencies:
    • Agencies responsible for building codes and energy efficiency standards may provide case studies.
  • Green Building Organizations:
    • GGBC GLOBAL GREEEN BUILDING COUNCIL and similar international organizations provide information and documentation on green building projects.

In essence, case studies provide valuable insights into how “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” are applied in practice, demonstrating the effectiveness of passive design strategies in achieving energy-efficient non-cooled structures.

COURTESY : Solar Decathlon India

White paper on Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non cooled Structures ?

Creating a comprehensive white paper on “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non-cooled Structures” would involve a detailed exploration of several key areas. Here’s an outline of what such a white paper would typically include:

White Paper Outline:

1. Introduction:

  • Overview of the importance of passive design in non-cooled structures.
  • Definition of “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models.”
  • Scope and objectives of the white paper.
  • Explanation of “Case 2 – Non-cooled Structures”.

2. Fundamentals of Passive Design:

  • Principles of thermal comfort in non-cooled environments.
  • Key passive design strategies:
    • Thermal mass.
    • Natural ventilation.
    • Solar control (shading, orientation).
    • Insulation and air sealing.
  • The role of the building envelope in passive design.

3. Gauge Models and Metrics:

  • Detailed explanation of key metrics:
    • U-value and R-value.
    • Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC).
    • Air change rates.
    • Thermal mass capacity.
  • Description of modeling tools:
    • Building Energy Modeling (BEM) software (EnergyPlus, etc.).
    • Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for ventilation analysis.
    • Solar analysis software.
  • Thermal bridging analysis methods.

4. Application of Gauge Models:

  • Step-by-step process for applying gauge models in building design.
  • Climate-specific considerations.
  • Case studies demonstrating the application of gauge models in various building types.
  • How to combine the metrics for a whole building analysis.

5. Design Optimization and Best Practices:

  • Strategies for optimizing building envelope design based on gauge model results.
  • Material selection guidelines for passive performance.
  • Best practices for natural ventilation design.
  • Shading and solar control techniques.
  • Mitigation of thermal bridging.

6. Challenges and Future Directions:

  • Limitations of current gauge models and simulation tools.
  • Emerging technologies and research in passive design.
  • The role of building automation and smart technologies.
  • Future trends in sustainable building practices.

7. Conclusion:

  • Summary of key findings.
  • Emphasis on the importance of integrated passive design.
  • Recommendations for future research and implementation.

Key Considerations for the White Paper:

  • Target Audience: Tailor the language and level of detail to the intended audience (architects, engineers, policymakers, etc.).
  • Visual Aids: Use diagrams, charts, and graphs to illustrate key concepts.
  • References: Cite relevant research, standards, and industry publications.
  • Practical Examples: Include real-world examples and case studies to demonstrate the application of gauge models.

By addressing these points, a white paper can provide valuable guidance for professionals and stakeholders involved in the design and construction of energy-efficient, non-cooled structures.

Industrial application of Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Noncooled Structures ?

The industrial application of “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures is particularly relevant for facilities where maintaining specific temperature and ventilation conditions is crucial, but active climate control is either impractical or undesirable. Here’s how these models are applied in industrial settings:

Key Industrial Applications:

  • Warehouses and Storage Facilities:
    • Many warehouses store temperature-sensitive goods that don’t require precise climate control but do need protection from extreme temperature fluctuations.
    • Gauge models help optimize the building envelope to:
      • Minimize solar heat gain in hot climates.
      • Prevent excessive heat loss in cold climates.
      • Ensure adequate natural ventilation to prevent moisture buildup.
  • Agricultural Buildings:
    • Barns, livestock facilities, and greenhouses rely heavily on natural ventilation and passive thermal control.
    • Gauge models are used to:
      • Design ventilation systems that provide adequate airflow for animal welfare.
      • Optimize greenhouse design for solar gain and temperature regulation.
      • Ensure proper insulation to protect stored crops.
  • Manufacturing Plants:
    • Certain manufacturing processes generate heat or require specific temperature conditions.
    • Passive design strategies can:
      • Reduce the need for mechanical ventilation.
      • Minimize heat stress for workers.
      • Optimize conditions for sensitive manufacturing processes.
  • Industrial Storage of Non-Perishable Goods:
    • Many industrial storage facilities hold items that do not require active cooling, but do require protection from large temperature swings, and moisture.
    • Gauge models are used to:
      • Optimize the building envelope to provide stable internal conditions.
      • Reduce the risk of condensation and mold growth.

How Gauge Models Are Applied in Industrial Settings:

  • Thermal Analysis:
    • Analyzing heat transfer through walls, roofs, and floors to optimize insulation levels.
    • Identifying and mitigating thermal bridges.
  • Ventilation Modeling:
    • Using CFD to simulate airflow patterns and ensure adequate natural ventilation.
    • Designing ventilation openings that maximize airflow while minimizing unwanted heat gain or loss.
  • Solar Analysis:
    • Optimizing building orientation and shading to minimize solar heat gain.
    • Selecting roofing and wall materials with high solar reflectance.
  • Material Selection:
    • Choosing materials with high thermal mass to stabilize indoor temperatures.
    • Selecting durable and weather-resistant materials for industrial environments.

Benefits of Using Gauge Models:

  • Reduced Energy Costs: Minimizing the need for active climate control.
  • Improved Product Storage: Maintaining stable temperature and humidity conditions.
  • Enhanced Worker Comfort: Providing a more comfortable working environment.
  • Increased Sustainability: Reducing the environmental impact of industrial operations.

In industrial applications, these models enable the creation of facilities that are both energy-efficient and conducive to the specific needs of the industrial processes they house.

Research and development of Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models for Building Envelope Estimates under Case 2 – Non cooled Structures ?

The research and development of “Least Energy Productivity Gauge Models” for building envelope estimates in non-cooled structures is a dynamic and evolving field. Here’s a look at some key areas of focus:

Key Research and Development Areas:

  • Advanced Modeling and Simulation:
    • Improving the accuracy and efficiency of building energy modeling (BEM) software.
    • Developing more sophisticated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models for natural ventilation analysis.
    • Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to enhance predictive capabilities.
  • Material Science:
    • Researching and developing new building materials with enhanced thermal properties, such as:
      • High thermal mass materials.
      • Advanced insulation materials.
      • Materials with dynamic thermal properties.
      • Improving the properties of reflective coatings.
    • Exploring the use of phase change materials (PCMs) to improve thermal storage.
  • Climate-Adaptive Design:
    • Developing design strategies that are tailored to specific climate conditions.
    • Creating tools and methodologies for assessing the impact of climate change on building performance.
    • Researching vernacular architecture and traditional building techniques for inspiration.
  • Natural Ventilation Optimization:
    • Investigating innovative natural ventilation strategies, such as:
      • Stack ventilation.
      • Cross ventilation.
      • Night ventilation.
    • Developing sensors and control systems to optimize natural ventilation based on real-time climate conditions.
  • Thermal Comfort Research:
    • Conducting studies on human thermal comfort in non-cooled environments.
    • Developing adaptive comfort models that account for individual and cultural variations.
    • Investigating the impact of indoor air quality on thermal comfort.
  • Integration of Digital Technologies:
    • Developing smart building technologies that can monitor and optimize building performance.
    • Using building information modeling (BIM) to facilitate the design and construction of energy-efficient buildings.
    • Development of IOT systems to monitor building performance.
  • Retrofit Technologies:
    • Researching cost effective ways to improve the thermal performance of existing structures.

Key Trends:

  • Increased focus on passive design strategies.
  • Growing emphasis on occupant comfort and well-being.
  • Integration of digital technologies for building performance optimization.
  • Emphasis on sustainable and resilient building design.

Research in this area is driven by the need to reduce energy consumption, mitigate climate change, and create healthier and more comfortable indoor environments.

COURTESY : Gurukul of Civil Engineers

References

  1. ^ “Wayback Machine” (PDF). www.nrel.gov.
  2. ^ “A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings” (PDF). US Department of Energy. September 2015.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b “Wayback Machine” (PDF). www.nrel.gov.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c Torcellini, P.; Pless, S.; Deru, M. (June 2006). “Zero Energy Buildings: A Critical Look at the Definition” (PDF). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved June 25, 2014.
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Khosla, Radhika; Bernhardt, Rob; Chan, Yi Chieh; Vérez, David; Hu, Shan; Cabeza, Luisa F. (17 October 2020). “Advances Toward a Net-Zero Global Building Sector”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 45 (1): 227–269. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-045843. hdl:10459.1/69710. S2CID 225303035. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b Harvey, L.D. Danny (17 October 2013). “Recent Advances in Sustainable Buildings: Review of the Energy and Cost Performance of the State-of-the-Art Best Practices from Around the World”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 38 (1): 281–309. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-070312-101940.
  7. ^ “Nearly Zero Energy Buildings”. European Union. 2014-07-31.
  8. ^ Baden, S., et al., “Hurdling Financial Barriers to Lower Energy Buildings: Experiences from the USA and Europe on Financial Incentives and Monetizing Building Energy Savings in Private Investment Decisions.” Proceedings of 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington DC, August 2006.
  9. ^ US Department of Energy. Annual Energy Review 2006 27 June 2007. Accessed 27 April 2008.
  10. ^ Roser, Max (4 December 2020). “Explained: why renewables became so cheap so fast”. World Economic Forum. Retrieved 9 April 2024.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b Winter, Steven. “Net Zero Energy Buildings”. wbdg.org. Whole Building Design Guide. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  12. ^ Frappe-Seneclauze, Tom-Pierre (2020). “Achieving Canada’s climate and housing goals through building retrofits” (PDF). Pembina Institute. JSTOR resrep25472. Retrieved 5 November 2020. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  13. ^ Tindale, Stephen; Holtham, Gerald (1996). Green Tax Reform. Institute for Public Policy Research. ISBN 9781860300363. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  14. ^ Jump up to:a b Alter, Lloyd (September 21, 2018). “Architecture 2030 goes after embodied carbon and this is a very big deal”. TreeHugger. Retrieved 2019-12-08.
  15. ^ Ebrahimi, Ghazal (2020). “Embodied carbon and deep retrofits”. Pembina Institute. JSTOR resrep25464. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  16. ^ Alter, Lloyd (April 29, 2019). “British architects are talking about embodied carbon”. TreeHugger. Retrieved 2019-12-08.
  17. ^ Alter, Lloyd (July 17, 2019). “Embodied Carbon called ‘The Blindspot of the Buildings Industry'”. TreeHugger. Retrieved 2019-12-08.
  18. ^ Alter, Lloyd. “The New Carbon Architecture, or why we should be ‘building out of sky’ (Book Review)”. TreeHugger. Retrieved 2019-12-08.
  19. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Landmark study shows how to change the building sector from a major carbon emitter to a major carbon sink”. TreeHugger. Retrieved 2019-12-08.
  20. ^ Stiebert, Seton; Echeverria, Daniella; Gass, Phillip; Kitson, Lucy. “Emission Omissions: Conclusions”. jstor.org. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  21. ^ US DOE 2015 A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings (PDF)
  22. ^ Nsaliwa, Dekhani; Vale, Robert; Isaacs, Nigel (2015-08-01). “Housing and Transportation: Towards a Multi-scale Net Zero Emission Housing Approach for Residential Buildings in New Zealand”. Energy Procedia. Clean, Efficient and Affordable Energy for a Sustainable Future: The 7th International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE2015). 75: 2826–2832. Bibcode:2015EnPro..75.2826N. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.560.
  23. ^ “Net Zero Energy Solar Buildings”. International Energy Agency: Solar Heating and Cooling Programme. 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  24. ^ European Parliament and the Council of the EU (16.06.2010): Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (EPBD 2010), Article 9: Member States shall ensure that: (a) by 31 December 2020, all new buildings are nearly zero- energy buildings; and (b) after 31 December 2018, new buildings occupied and owned by public authorities are nearly zero-energy buildings
  25. ^ Salom, Jaume; Widen, Joakim; Candanedo, Jose A.; Sartori, Igor; Voss, Karsten; Marszal, Anna Joanna (2011): Understanding Net Zero Energy Buildings: Evaluation of Load Matching and Grid Interaction Indicators. Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. Sydney
  26. ^ Tuominen, P. (2020): Yes to positive energy districts – but how to make it happen?. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Sartori, Igor; Napolitano, Assunta; Voss, Karsten (2012): Net Zero Energy Buildings: A Consistent Definition Framework. In: Energy and Buildings (48), pp. 220–232
  28. ^ Voss, Karsten; Sartori, Igor; Lollini, Roberto (2012): Nearly-zero, Net zero and Plus Energy Buildings. How definitions & regulations affect solutions. In: REHVA Journal 6 (49), pp. 23–27
  29. ^ Voss, Karsten; Musall, Eike (2012): Net zero energy buildings – International projects of carbon neutrality in buildings. 2nd ed., Institut für Internationale Architektur-Dokumentation, München, ISBN 978-3-920034-80-5.
  30. ^ Marszal, Anna Joanna; Heiselberg, Per; Bourelle, Julien; Musall, Eike; Voss, Karsten; Sartori, Igor; Napolitano, Assunta (2011): Zero Energy Building – A Review of definitions and calculation methodologies. In: Energy and Buildings 43 (4), pp. 971–979
  31. ^ Vieira, R., “The Energy Policy Pyramid – A Hierarchal Tool For Decision Makers”., Fifteenth Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates, July 24–26, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
  32. ^ Frej, Anne, ed. (2005). Green Office Buildings: A Practical Guide to Development. Urban Land Institute. pp. 138–142. ISBN 978-0-87420-937-2.
  33. ^ “Zero-Energy Buildings”. environment-ecology.com.
  34. ^ Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency (DSIRE) Home. 2007.
  35. ^ Jump up to:a b P. Eiffert. Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Power Systems. Prepared for National Renewable Energy Laboratory. January 2003.
  36. ^ Jump up to:a b Spiegel, Jan Allen. “The House that Green Built.” New York Times. 20 April 2008. Last retrieved: 15 December 2013.
  37. ^ Peters, Adele (2022-04-08). “This prefab ‘second skin’ makes outdated apartment buildings net zero”. Fast Company. Retrieved 2022-04-09.
  38. ^ Peters, Adele (2022-01-14). “This Dutch construction innovation shows it’s possible to quickly retrofit every building”. Fast Company. Retrieved 2022-04-09.
  39. ^ https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/13796708.pdf [dead link]
  40. ^ Energy Pyramid Ref
  41. ^ “Renewable Energy Has a Variability Problem”. The Green Economy Post: Green Careers, Green Business, Sustainability. 2010-11-30. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  42. ^ Seto, Karen C.; Churkina, Galina; Hsu, Angel; Keller, Meredith; Newman, Peter W.G.; Qin, Bo; Ramaswami, Anu (18 October 2021). “From Low- to Net-Zero Carbon Cities: The Next Global Agenda”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 46 (1): 377–415. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-050120-113117. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 238677484.
  43. ^ “Go Solar California”. www.gosolarcalifornia.ca.gov.
  44. ^ “Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency®”. DSIRE.
  45. ^ “Wayback Machine” (PDF). www.usda.gov.
  46. ^ “World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on September 7, 2008.
  47. ^ World Business Council for Sustainable Development, August 2007, Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Business Realities and Opportunities Retrieved: 2007-09-05.
  48. ^ Goyal, K. K. (July 14, 2009). Renewable Energy. New Delhi: Mahaveer & Sons. p. Influential Zero-and Low-Energy Buildings. ISBN 978-81-8377-243-3. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
  49. ^ “Net Zero Foundation”. netzerofoundation.org.
  50. ^ “100% Net Zero Carbon Plan, 60% NZ Effectively Free, Expert Team Ready! – MIT Climate Mitigation Solutions 2016 – Climate CoLab”. Climate CoLab.
  51. ^ David (5 October 2018). “Solar Panels Removed from Universe of Energy Building at Epcot”.
  52. ^ Reinhart, Christoph F.; Cerezo Davila, Carlos (2016-02-15). “Urban building energy modeling – A review of a nascent field”. Building and Environment. 97: 196–202. Bibcode:2016BuEnv..97..196R. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.12.001. hdl:1721.1/122031. ISSN 0360-1323.
  53. ^ “Building Energy Rating Ireland”. Buildingenergyireland.ie. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  54. ^ Epstein, S. “Why Glass Skyscrapers Are Bad For The Environment”.
  55. ^ Agar, Betsy (November 1, 2020). “Barriers to deep retrofits: Regulatory solutions from across Canada”. Pembina Institute: 1–7. JSTOR resrep28314.
  56. ^ US Environmental Protection Agency, “Green Building,” 16 Apr. 2008. Accessed on: 17 May 2008.
  57. ^ The National Institute of Building Sciences (2015). “A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings” (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy.
  58. ^ Torcellini, P. “Zero Energy Buildings: A Critical Look at the Definition” (PDF).
  59. ^ Jump up to:a b Alter, L. “Embodied Carbon Called ‘The Blindspot of the Buildings Industry'”.
  60. ^ “A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings” (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  61. ^ “What is green building?”. World Green Building Council. World Green Building Council. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  62. ^ “Green Building”. EPA. Environmental Protection Agency.
  63. ^ Sudhakar, K (2019). “Net Zero Building Designs In Hot and Humid Climates: A State of Art”. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 13: 100400. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2019.100400
  64. ^ “Net Zero Energy Building”. Green Building Alliance. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  65. ^ Ken, Edelstein (31 May 2017). “Net Zero Energy is dead, long live Zero Energy”. Kendeda Fund. The Kendeda Fund. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  66. ^ “Net Zero Energy is dead, long live Zero Energy”. Green Building Alliance. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  67. ^ Ayoub, Josef (September 2013). “Towards Net Zero Energy Solar Buildings” (PDF). NET ZEB.
  68. ^ “The Paris Agreement”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved 2020-11-05.
  69. ^ Jump up to:a b “Paris Agreement | Summary & Facts”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-11-05.
  70. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Liu, Zhijian; Zhou, Qingxu; Tian, Zhiyong; He, Bao-jie; Jin, Guangya (2019-10-01). “A comprehensive analysis on definitions, development, and policies of nearly zero energy buildings in China”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 114: 109314. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109314. ISSN 1364-0321.
  71. ^ “Amending the Australian Energy Regulator Wholesale Market Monitoring and Reporting Framework – draft legislation and consultation paper”. Energy and Climate Change Ministerial Council. 7 June 2023.
  72. ^ “Sustainable building case studies”. Facts and figures of Council House 2.
  73. ^ “petertomjones.be”. www.petertomjones.be.
  74. ^ Nacional, Imprensa. “PORTARIA Nº 42, de 24 de fevereiro de 2021 – DOU – Imprensa Nacional”. www.in.gov.br (in Brazilian Portuguese). Retrieved 2021-06-16.
  75. ^ “Why Choose a Net Zero Home”. Canadian New Home Builders Association. Retrieved 11 September 2020.
  76. ^ “Build Smart Canada’s National Building Strategy” (PDF). Natural Resources Canada. July 2017.
  77. ^ “Net Zero Projects and Programs – Canadian Home Builders’ Association”.
  78. ^ “EQuilibrium™ Housing”. CMHC. Archived from the original on 2013-06-10. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
  79. ^ “EcoTerra House” (PDF). Canadian Home Builders’ Association.
  80. ^ Net Zero-energy home design strategies, Canada
  81. ^ “Varennes Net-Zero Library – Award of Excellence”. Canadian Consulting Engineer. Retrieved 2018-02-23.
  82. ^ [1] Archived July 13, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ “EcoPlusHome”. ecoplushome.com. 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  84. ^ Jump up to:a b Sinton, Jonathan E; Levine, Mark D; Qingyi, Wang (1998-09-01). “Energy efficiency in China: accomplishments and challenges”. Energy Policy. 26 (11): 813–829. Bibcode:1998EnPol..26..813S. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00004-4. ISSN 0301-4215.
  85. ^ Myers, Steven Lee (2020-09-25). “China’s Pledge to Be Carbon Neutral by 2060: What It Means”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-11-05.
  86. ^ Podesta, John; Sandalow, David (13 October 2020). “China must take action now on net zero pledge”. Financial Times. Retrieved 2020-11-05.
  87. ^ Jump up to:a b Zhang, Jingjing; Zhou, Nan; Hinge, Adam; Feng, Wei; Zhang, Shicong (2016-08-17). “Governance strategies to achieve zero-energy buildings in China”. Building Research & Information. 44 (5–6): 604–618. Bibcode:2016BuRI…44..604Z. doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1157345. ISSN 0961-3218. S2CID 155395168.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Pearl River Tower”. www.architecturalrecord.com. Retrieved 2020-11-05.
  89. ^ Tomlinson, Richard (2014). “Case Study: Pearl River Tower, Guangzhou” (PDF). CTBUH Journal. II.
  90. ^ “DOE Solar Decathlon: Final Results”. www.solardecathlon.org.
  91. ^ “Fehlerseite 404 – Fraunhofer ISE”. Fraunhofer-Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE.
  92. ^ “Prime Minister Inaugurates ‘Indira Paryavaran Bhawan’. Bhawan is India’s First on Site Net Zero Building”. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 25 February 2014. Retrieved 23 May 2014.
  93. ^ “Welcome to Indira Paryavaran Bhawan”. March 24, 2019. Archived from the original on 2019-03-24.
  94. ^ “Fajr-e-Tosea Consulting Engineers Co”. fajr-t.com. 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  95. ^ سایت, مدیر. “گروه ششم: زیر سیستمها”. www.mapsa.co.ir. Archived from the original on July 30, 2013.
  96. ^ “Oil Industry Investment Company”. oiic-ir.com. 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  97. ^ “شرکت ره گستر نفت”. Oiic-ir.com. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  98. ^ “zero2020energyhtml”. Zero2020energy.com. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b “Caribbean’s First Net Zero Building Opens at University”. Project Green Building. 27 October 2017.
  100. ^ “ゼロエネルギー住宅（ZEH）とは”. リフォームLab.｜エコでスマートなおうちづくり研究会.
  101. ^ Jump up to:a b “Mitsubishi Electric Receives Net Zero Energy Building Certification”. Smart Energy International. 9 August 2019.
  102. ^ “Mitsubishi Electric’s Net Zero Energy Building Test Facility to Be Completed on Oct. 14”. Businesswire. October 2020.
  103. ^ “The Present and Future of Net Zero Energy Houses in Japan”. Real Estate Japan. 6 August 2015.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b “Japan’s First Zero Energy Apartment Building Coming In 2019”. Sekisui House News Release. 20 December 2016.
  105. ^ Lee, Crystal (November 2022). “Regulations from 2023 on carbon emissions for new buildings to drive ESG adoption” (PDF). Savills Research. Korea ESG: 3 – via Savills Korea.
  106. ^ “에너지엑스, 국내 첫 상업용 플러스 제로에너지빌딩 건설”. news.koreadaily.com (in Korean). 2023-05-26. Retrieved 2023-10-27.
  107. ^ “건축 플랫폼 에너지엑스, 제로에너지 포럼 및 준공식 개최”. 넥스트데일리 (in Korean). 2023-10-25. Retrieved 2023-10-27.
  108. ^ “에너지엑스, 에너지자립률 121.7%… 국내 최초 플러스 제로에너지빌딩 준공”. 인더스트리뉴스 (in Korean). 2023-10-13. Retrieved 2023-10-27.
  109. ^ PTM Zero Energy Office Building Project. August 2006.
  110. ^ Steve Lojuntin (2018-03-11). “Zero Energy Building in Malaysia by SEDA Malaysia”. SEDA Malaysia.
  111. ^ “huisvesting”.
  112. ^ “Singapore : NUS launches Singapores first new-build net-zero energy building”. MENA Report. 2019.
  113. ^ “Singapore’s first ‘Zero Energy Building’ launched”. LushHomeMedia. 2009-10-26. Retrieved 2022-08-05.
  114. ^ “Speech by Minister Lawrence Wong at the Singapore Green Building Week Opening Ceremony 2018”. www.mnd.gov.sg. 2018-09-05. Retrieved 2022-08-05.
  115. ^ von Muralt, Klaus (5 June 2011). “Mit ‘Nullenergie’ in eine klimabewusste Zukunft”. Der Bund. Retrieved 5 June 2011.
  116. ^ Why we’ve resigned from the Zero Carbon Taskforce WWF UK, published 2011-04-04, accessed 2014-02-10
  117. ^ Government’s U turn on Zero Carbon is anti-green and anti-growth UK Green Building Council, published 11-03-23, accessed 2014-02-10
  118. ^ “Nearly Zero Energy Buildings Requirements for New Public Buildings” (PDF). Ministry of Housing, Communities, & Local Government. 2019-01-14. Retrieved 2022-08-04.
  119. ^ “Building America: Bringing Building Innovations to Market – Department of Energy”. www.buildingamerica.gov.
  120. ^ Jump up to:a b “U.S. DOE – 2007 Solar Decathlon Closing Ceremony and Awards”. October 2007. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
  121. ^ “U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007”. Archived from the original on 2016-01-15. Retrieved 2007-12-23.
  122. ^ “Budget of the United States Government, FY 2008: Department of Energy”. Archived from the original on 2007-08-20.
  123. ^ “Fact Sheet: President Bush Signs Into Law a National Energy Plan”. whitehouse.gov – via National Archives.
  124. ^ Goals of the Siebel Foundation Energy Free Home Challenge
  125. ^ “Forbes Video”. Forbes. Archived from the original on June 6, 2009.
  126. ^ “2008 Siebel Foundation Report” (PDF).
  127. ^ S., Al-Beaini (26 February 2010). “Feasibility of Achieving a Zero-Net-Energy, Zero-Net-Cost Homes”.
  128. ^ “California Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan” (PDF). California Energy Commission. Retrieved March 3, 2016.
  129. ^ “Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan”. www.cpuc.ca.gov. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  130. ^ Jump up to:a b “Home | UC Davis West Village”. westvillage.ucdavis.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  131. ^ Honda. “Honda Smart Home US”. Honda Smart Home US. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  132. ^ “Wayback Machine” (PDF). www.hpbmagazine.org.
  133. ^ “Energy Information Administration (EIA) – Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS)” (PDF). www.eia.doe.gov.
  134. ^ “Assemblywoman Mary Hayashi to Present Resolution to Red Top Electric”. PRWeb. 15 October 2012. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020.
  135. ^ Wyatt, John (6 November 2012). “A Good Idea”. wconline.com. Wall and Ceiling Magazine. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
  136. ^ “Vista Solar Helps Leyva Middle School Earn Net-Zero Energy Distinction”. PRWeb. Archived from the original on June 16, 2022. Retrieved 2022-06-16.
  137. ^ “Sacred Heart Stevens Net-Zero Library: First In The U.S. To Achieve Net Zero Energy Building Certification”. WRNS Studio. Retrieved 2018-02-23.
  138. ^ Shapiro, Gideon Fink (2021-07-21). “Phase-Change Architecture at the Santa Monica City Services Building”. www.architectmagazine.com. Retrieved 2021-08-17.
  139. ^ “CARB dedicates new Southern California headquarters in Riverside | California Air Resources Board”. ww2.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved 2021-11-19.
  140. ^ “California Air Resources Board Southern California Headquarters, Mary D. Nichols Campus – Work – ZGF”. www.zgf.com. Retrieved 2021-11-19.
  141. ^ Doerr, Thomas (2012). Passive Solar Simplified. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
  142. ^ “Case Studies: Net-Zero Energy House in Evergreen, Colorado”. Doerr.org. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  143. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Net Zero Examples”. Sustainable Facilities Tool. The Office of Federal High-Performance Green Buildings. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
  144. ^ “CC’s Net-Zero Energy Library Opens • Colorado College”. www.coloradocollege.edu. Retrieved 2018-02-23.
  145. ^ “ZEH: Lakeland, FL”. www.fsec.ucf.edu.
  146. ^ “Walgreens Debuts Nation’s First Net Zero Energy Retail Store in Evanston, Ill”. news.walgreens.com. November 21, 2013. Retrieved 2022-06-16.
  147. ^ “Institut für Baubiologie + Nachhaltigkeit IBN”. Institut für Baubiologie + Nachhaltigkeit IBN. Archived from the original on 2011-01-31. Retrieved 2012-06-11.
  148. ^ “Net Zero Is Bliss At Maharishi University In Iowa”. www.earthtechling.com.
  149. ^ “EcoVibz”. EcoVibz.
  150. ^ “High Performing Buildings – Fall 2012”. www.nxtbook.com.
  151. ^ “High Performing Buildings – Winter 2015 – Locust Trace AgriScience Center”. www.nxtbook.com.
  152. ^ Cambridge, City of. “Net Zero Action Plan – CDD – City of Cambridge, Massachusetts”. www.cambridgema.gov.
  153. ^ “THRIVE”. THRIVE.
  154. ^ “‘Mission Zero’ achieved in Ann Arbor”. www.mnn.com.
  155. ^ “THRIVE”. THRIVE.
  156. ^ “America’s Oldest Net Zero Solar House – Old House Web Blog”. www.oldhouseweb.com.
  157. ^ Koch, Wendy (11 June 2010). “110-Year-Old Home Gets Net Zero Energy Rehab”. USA Today.
  158. ^ “Green Builder Magazine”. December 2009. pp. 31–34.
  159. ^ “Lenawee ISD Opens High-Tech Education Showplace”. 10 June 2013.
  160. ^ “A Net Zero Office Today”. November 19, 2010. Archived from the original on December 5, 2010.
  161. ^ “Nation’s First Zero-Net Energy Home Development”, Mid-Hudson Energy $mart Communities newsletter, Winter 2011 Edition
  162. ^ “Green Acres: Developer to Build Zero Energy Homes in New Paltz”, New Paltz Times, August 7, 2008
  163. ^ “On the House”, Daily News, April 8, 2011
  164. ^ “Going Net-Zero in New York State”[permanent dead link], Solar Today, July / August 2010
  165. ^ “Zero-Net Energy Homes”, New York House, August 2009
  166. ^ “Builders Challenge: About Builders Challenge”. Archived from the original on 2011-09-03. Retrieved 2011-06-11.
  167. ^ NESEA Letter October 2008[full citation needed]
  168. ^ “Zero Energy Design Abundant Energy In Harmony With Nature”. Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  169. ^ “Painters Hall”. ilbi.org.
  170. ^ “Phipps Conservatory – Center for Sustainable Landscapes”. Phipps Conservatory. Archived from the original on 11 November 2011. Retrieved 1 July 2014.
  171. ^ “Net Zero Examples – GSA Sustainable Facilities Tool”. SFTool.gov. Retrieved 1 July 2014.
  172. ^ Negley, Erin. “Here’s how Pennsylvania’s first zero-energy building, at Millersville, generated almost twice the energy used”. Lancaster Online. LNP Media Group. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
  173. ^ “What It Takes to Go Net-Zero”. www.architectmagazine.com. October 5, 2017. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  174. ^ “UNT to build Zero Energy Research Laboratory”. University of North Texas. 30 June 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  175. ^ “Lab designed to study green energy technologies completed at UNT”. University of North Texas. 10 April 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  176. ^ “Irving Library Operates on Solar Power”. NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth. Retrieved 2018-02-23.
  177. ^ “Irving West Library – DFW Solar Home Tour”. dfwsolartour.org. Retrieved 2018-02-23.
  178. ^ “Putney School’s Net-Zero Fieldhouse Is Net-Zero”. The Putney School.
  179. ^ “AIA-Vermont Honor Award”. The Putney School.
  180. ^ “Zero Energy 2009 Winner”. Northeast Sustainable Energy Association.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »