Leave a Comment / Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% / By

Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

It seems like you’re asking about daylighting, which is the practice of using natural sunlight to illuminate the interior of a building. The percentages you mentioned (50%, 75%, 95%) likely refer to the percentage of a space that is effectively lit by daylight.

Here’s a breakdown of what those percentages might mean in the context of daylighting:

  • 50% Daylighting: This could indicate that half of the space receives sufficient natural light, while the other half may rely more on artificial lighting. This level of daylighting might be achieved through smaller windows or a less optimized building design.
  • 75% Daylighting: A higher percentage like this suggests a more significant reliance on daylighting. The space likely has larger windows, skylights, or other design features that maximize the penetration of natural light. This can lead to reduced energy consumption and a more pleasant environment.
  • 95% Daylighting: This is a very high level of daylighting, indicating that nearly the entire space is illuminated by natural light. Achieving this level often requires careful planning and design, potentially including features like light shelves, atriums, or reflective surfaces to distribute daylight effectively.

Benefits of Daylighting:

  • Energy Savings: Daylighting reduces the need for artificial lighting, leading to lower electricity bills and a smaller carbon footprint.
  • Improved Well-being: Studies have shown that natural light can improve mood, productivity, and overall health.
  • Enhanced Aesthetics: Daylighting can create a more visually appealing and dynamic space, highlighting textures and colors in a natural way.

Factors Affecting Daylighting:

  • Building Design: The size, orientation, and placement of windows, skylights, and other openings play a crucial role in how much daylight enters a building.
  • Climate: The amount of sunlight available in a particular location will affect the potential for daylighting.
  • Surrounding Environment: Nearby buildings, trees, and other obstacles can block sunlight and reduce the effectiveness of daylighting strategies.

If you’re interested in learning more about daylighting, I recommend exploring resources from organizations like the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) or the Global green building council (GGBC). They offer valuable information and guidelines on designing for effective daylighting.

What is Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

Daylighting in buildings refers to the practice of using natural sunlight to illuminate the interior of a building. The percentages you mentioned (50%, 75%, 95%) likely refer to the percentage of a space that is effectively lit by daylight.

Here’s a breakdown of what those percentages might mean in the context of daylighting:

  • 50% Daylighting: This could indicate that half of the space receives sufficient natural light, while the other half may rely more on artificial lighting. This level of daylighting might be achieved through smaller windows or a less optimized building design.
  • 75% Daylighting: A higher percentage like this suggests a more significant reliance on daylighting. The space likely has larger windows, skylights, or other design features that maximize the penetration of natural light. This can lead to reduced energy consumption and a more pleasant environment.
  • 95% Daylighting: This is a very high level of daylighting, indicating that nearly the entire space is illuminated by natural light. Achieving this level often requires careful planning and design, potentially including features like light shelves, atriums, or reflective surfaces to distribute daylight effectively.

Benefits of Daylighting:

  • Energy Savings: Daylighting reduces the need for artificial lighting, leading to lower electricity bills and a smaller carbon footprint.
  • Improved Well-being: Studies have shown that natural light can improve mood, productivity, and overall health.
  • Enhanced Aesthetics: Daylighting can create a more visually appealing and dynamic space, highlighting textures and colors in a natural way.

Factors Affecting Daylighting:

  • Building Design: The size, orientation, and placement of windows, skylights, and other openings play a crucial role in how much daylight enters a building.
  • Climate: The amount of sunlight available in a particular location will affect the potential for daylighting.
  • Surrounding Environment: Nearby buildings, trees, and other obstacles can block sunlight and reduce the effectiveness of daylighting strategies.

If you’re interested in learning more about daylighting, I recommend exploring resources from organizations like the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) or the Global green building council (GGBC). They offer valuable information and guidelines on designing for effective daylighting.

Who is required Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

Daylighting in buildings refers to the practice of using natural sunlight to illuminate the interior of a building. The percentages you mentioned (50%, 75%, 95%) likely refer to the percentage of a space that is effectively lit by daylight.

Here’s a breakdown of what those percentages might mean in the context of daylighting:

  • 50% Daylighting: This could indicate that half of the space receives sufficient natural light, while the other half may rely more on artificial lighting. This level of daylighting might be achieved through smaller windows or a less optimized building design.
  • 75% Daylighting: A higher percentage like this suggests a more significant reliance on daylighting. The space likely has larger windows, skylights, or other design features that maximize the penetration of natural light. This can lead to reduced energy consumption and a more pleasant environment.
  • 95% Daylighting: This is a very high level of daylighting, indicating that nearly the entire space is illuminated by natural light. Achieving this level often requires careful planning and design, potentially including features like light shelves, atriums, or reflective surfaces to distribute daylight effectively.

Benefits of Daylighting:

  • Energy Savings: Daylighting reduces the need for artificial lighting, leading to lower electricity bills and a smaller carbon footprint.
  • Improved Well-being: Studies have shown that natural light can improve mood, productivity, and overall health.
  • Enhanced Aesthetics: Daylighting can create a more visually appealing and dynamic space, highlighting textures and colors in a natural way.

Factors Affecting Daylighting:

  • Building Design: The size, orientation, and placement of windows, skylights, and other openings play a crucial role in how much daylight enters a building.
  • Climate: The amount of sunlight available in a particular location will affect the potential for daylighting.
  • Surrounding Environment: Nearby buildings, trees, and other obstacles can block sunlight and reduce the effectiveness of daylighting strategies.

If you’re interested in learning more about daylighting, I recommend exploring resources from organizations like the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) or the Global Green building council (GGBC). They offer valuable information and guidelines on designing for effective daylighting.

COURTESY : Solatube International, Inc.

Where is required Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

The requirement for specific daylighting percentages (50%, 75%, 95%) depends heavily on several factors, and there isn’t a single universal rule. It’s not usually a legally mandated requirement in those exact percentages. Instead, it’s more about achieving desired outcomes and meeting various standards and guidelines. Here’s a breakdown of where these levels might be relevant:

  • Green Building Certifications GGBC, etc.): These certifications often award points for achieving certain levels of daylighting. While they might not specify exactly 50%, 75%, or 95%, they will set performance targets that translate to those kinds of percentages. For instance, they might require a certain percentage of the regularly occupied spaces to have sufficient daylight. Higher percentages of daylighting contribute to higher certification levels.
  • Building Codes and Standards: Some building codes might have minimum daylighting requirements, though they are more likely to be expressed in terms of illuminance levels (lux or foot-candles) or a minimum percentage of the area needing daylight. These codes are primarily focused on ensuring occupant health and safety.
  • Design Goals: Architects and building owners often set daylighting goals based on factors like:
    • Energy Efficiency: Higher daylighting percentages mean less reliance on artificial lighting, leading to energy savings.
    • Occupant Well-being: Natural light is linked to improved mood, productivity, and health. So, higher daylighting levels are desirable in offices, schools, and other spaces where people spend significant time.
    • Aesthetics: Daylighting can create more pleasant and visually interesting spaces.
  • Specific Building Types:
    • Offices: Daylighting is highly valued in offices to improve productivity and reduce energy costs. Higher percentages are often targeted.
    • Schools: Studies show that daylighting can improve student performance, making it a key design consideration.
    • Retail Spaces: Daylighting can enhance the shopping experience and highlight merchandise.
    • Residential Buildings: While not always a primary focus, daylighting is still important in homes for comfort and well-being.

In summary: There’s no universal “required” percentage. Instead, the desired daylighting level is determined by a combination of green building certifications, building codes, design goals, and the specific type of building. The percentages you mentioned are likely used as a way to understand and communicate the extent of daylighting achieved in a space, often in the context of pursuing green building certifications or meeting specific performance targets.

How is required Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

You’re asking how daylighting levels of 50%, 75%, or 95% are achieved in a building. It’s a combination of design strategies, careful planning, and sometimes, specialized technologies. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Building Design and Orientation:

  • Orientation: The building’s orientation relative to the sun’s path is crucial. Buildings oriented to maximize south-facing windows (in the Northern Hemisphere) or north-facing windows (in the Southern Hemisphere) can capture more daylight.
  • Building Shape and Form: Compact building forms with shallower floor plates allow daylight to penetrate deeper into the interior. Atriums and courtyards can bring daylight into the center of a building.
  • Window Placement and Size: Larger windows and strategically placed windows (higher on the wall, for example) allow more daylight to enter. The type of glazing (glass) also affects how much light is transmitted.
  • Skylights and Roof Windows: These can provide daylight to spaces that wouldn’t otherwise receive enough natural light, especially in single-story buildings or top floors.

2. Interior Design and Finishes:

  • Light-Colored Surfaces: Light-colored walls, ceilings, and floors reflect daylight and help distribute it further into the space. This “bouncing” of light is essential for achieving higher daylighting percentages.
  • Open Floor Plans: Open layouts allow daylight to penetrate more easily throughout the space, rather than being blocked by walls and partitions.
  • Furniture Placement: Careful placement of furniture can prevent it from blocking daylight from reaching deeper into the room.

3. Shading Devices:

  • Overhangs and Louvers: These exterior shading devices can block direct sunlight during the hottest parts of the day, preventing glare and overheating, while still allowing diffuse daylight to enter.
  • Light Shelves: These horizontal shelves reflect daylight deeper into the room, effectively increasing the reach of natural light.

4. Advanced Technologies (Less Common for Basic Daylighting):

  • Light Pipes: These tubes transport daylight from the roof or exterior of a building to interior spaces that don’t have direct access to windows.
  • Heliostats: These systems use mirrors to track the sun and redirect sunlight to a specific location.
  • Anidolic Lighting Systems: These systems use specialized reflectors to distribute daylight evenly throughout a space.

5. Performance Measurement and Modeling:

  • Daylight Modeling Software: Architects and engineers use sophisticated software to simulate daylighting performance in a building design. This allows them to optimize the design for maximum daylight penetration before construction.
  • Post-Occupancy Evaluation: After a building is occupied, measurements can be taken to verify the actual daylighting levels and make adjustments if necessary.

Achieving Specific Percentages:

Reaching 75% or 95% daylighting is significantly more challenging than reaching 50%. It requires a holistic design approach that integrates all of the above strategies. For very high levels of daylighting, advanced technologies or unique building forms might be necessary. It’s also important to remember that daylighting levels can vary throughout the day and year, so designs need to consider these variations.

In short: Achieving specific daylighting percentages is an iterative process that involves careful planning, design, and analysis. It’s not just about adding more windows; it’s about strategically using daylight to create comfortable, energy-efficient, and healthy spaces.

Case study is Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

Let’s explore some hypothetical case studies to illustrate how different daylighting percentages might be achieved and what the implications are:

Case Study 1: Suburban Office Building – 50% Daylighting

  • Building Type: Three-story office building in a suburban setting.
  • Daylighting Goal: 50% of the regularly occupied spaces to achieve sufficient daylighting.
  • Strategies:
    • Standard window-to-wall ratio on the exterior walls.
    • Perimeter offices and open-plan workspaces benefit from daylight.
    • Core areas (restrooms, elevators, storage) rely primarily on artificial lighting.
    • Light-colored paint on interior walls and ceilings.
  • Results:
    • Achieves a moderate level of daylighting.
    • Reduces energy consumption for lighting compared to a building with minimal daylighting.
    • Occupants in perimeter zones benefit from natural light, but those in core areas do not.
    • Relatively low initial cost for daylighting strategies.

Case Study 2: Urban High-Rise – 75% Daylighting

  • Building Type: 20-story office building in a dense urban environment.
  • Daylighting Goal: 75% of the regularly occupied spaces to achieve sufficient daylighting.
  • Strategies:
    • Optimized building form and orientation to maximize daylight penetration.
    • Larger windows and strategically placed skylights on the upper floors.
    • Light shelves on the exterior facade to redirect daylight deeper into the building.
    • Use of reflective materials on interior surfaces.
    • Open-plan office layout to allow daylight to reach further into the space.
  • Results:
    • Significant reduction in energy consumption for lighting.
    • Improved occupant comfort and productivity due to increased access to natural light.
    • Higher initial cost for daylighting strategies compared to the 50% case study.
    • Requires careful design and engineering to avoid glare and overheating.

Case Study 3: School Building – 95% Daylighting

  • Building Type: Elementary school with classrooms, library, and gymnasium.
  • Daylighting Goal: 95% of learning spaces to achieve sufficient daylighting.
  • Strategies:
    • Building designed with a long, narrow form to maximize perimeter exposure.
    • Large windows in classrooms, often with light shelves or other shading devices.
    • Skylights in corridors and common areas.
    • Light wells or atriums to bring daylight into the center of the building.
    • High-reflectance interior finishes.
    • Use of daylight-responsive lighting controls that dim artificial lights when natural light is available.
  • Results:
    • Substantial energy savings and reduced operating costs.
    • Potential for improved student performance and well-being.
    • Highest initial cost for daylighting strategies.
    • Requires careful consideration of solar heat gain and glare control.

Key Considerations Across Case Studies:

  • Climate: Daylighting strategies must be adapted to the local climate. Hot climates require more emphasis on shading devices, while colder climates may prioritize maximizing solar gain.
  • Cost: Higher daylighting percentages generally require higher initial investment. However, the long-term energy savings can offset these costs.
  • Occupant Comfort: Daylighting design must address potential issues like glare, overheating, and uneven light distribution.
  • Sustainability: Maximizing daylighting contributes to green building certifications and reduces the building’s environmental footprint.

These case studies illustrate the range of possibilities for daylighting design. The specific strategies and outcomes will vary depending on the building type, location, budget, and design goals. It’s crucial to consider daylighting early in the design process to integrate it effectively and achieve the desired results.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

White Paper: Exploring Daylighting Strategies for 50%, 75%, and 95% Illumination

Abstract:

Daylighting, the practice of utilizing natural sunlight to illuminate building interiors, offers numerous benefits, including energy savings, improved occupant well-being, and enhanced aesthetics. This white paper explores the strategies and considerations for achieving varying levels of daylighting, specifically 50%, 75%, and 95% illumination, in building design. It examines the challenges and opportunities associated with each level, providing insights for architects, engineers, and building owners seeking to optimize daylighting performance.

1. Introduction:

Daylighting has evolved from a simple concept to a sophisticated design discipline. Beyond its aesthetic appeal, it contributes significantly to energy efficiency, occupant health, and environmental sustainability. This paper delves into the specific strategies required to achieve different daylighting targets, recognizing that each level presents unique design considerations. While exact percentages are rarely mandated, they serve as useful benchmarks for understanding and communicating daylighting performance goals.

2. Daylighting Metrics and Measurement:

Defining and measuring daylighting performance is crucial. While the percentages of 50%, 75%, and 95% are used here for illustrative purposes, actual metrics often involve:

  • Daylight Factor (DF): The ratio of indoor illuminance to outdoor illuminance.
  • Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI): The percentage of time that a space receives sufficient daylight (typically between 300 and 3000 lux).
  • Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA): The percentage of space that meets a minimum daylight illuminance level for a specified percentage of the occupied hours of the year.

These metrics are typically calculated using daylight modeling software, allowing designers to predict and optimize daylighting performance before construction.

3. Daylighting Strategies:

Achieving different daylighting levels requires a tailored approach, combining architectural design, material selection, and sometimes advanced technologies.

3.1. 50% Daylighting:

  • Characteristics: Represents a moderate level of daylighting, often achievable with standard building designs.
  • Strategies:
    • Conventional window-to-wall ratios.
    • Perimeter zoning for daylight-dependent spaces.
    • Light-colored interior finishes to enhance light reflection.
  • Challenges:
    • Limited daylight penetration in core areas.
    • Potential for glare and solar heat gain.

3.2. 75% Daylighting:

  • Characteristics: Indicates a significant reliance on daylighting, requiring more intentional design strategies.
  • Strategies:
    • Optimized building orientation and form to maximize daylight capture.
    • Larger windows and strategically placed skylights.
    • Light shelves and other shading devices to control direct sunlight and redirect daylight.
    • Open floor plans to facilitate daylight distribution.
  • Challenges:
    • Requires careful consideration of solar heat gain and glare control.
    • May necessitate higher initial construction costs.

3.3. 95% Daylighting:

  • Characteristics: Represents a near-complete reliance on daylighting, demanding a holistic and integrated design approach.
  • Strategies:
    • Building form optimized for daylight penetration (e.g., narrow floor plates, atriums).
    • Extensive use of skylights, roof windows, and light wells.
    • High-performance glazing and shading systems.
    • Advanced daylighting technologies (e.g., light pipes, heliostats) may be considered.
  • Challenges:
    • Significant design and engineering challenges.
    • Highest initial construction costs.
    • Requires meticulous attention to detail to avoid glare, overheating, and other performance issues.

4. Case Studies (Illustrative Examples):

  • 50%: A small office building with perimeter offices benefiting from daylight, while core areas rely on artificial lighting.
  • 75%: A school building with classrooms featuring large windows and light shelves, maximizing daylight for learning environments.
  • 95%: A museum with a complex roof structure incorporating skylights and light wells to illuminate exhibits while minimizing direct sunlight damage.

5. Considerations:

  • Climate: Local climate significantly influences daylighting strategies.
  • Building Type: Different building types have varying daylighting needs and opportunities.
  • Cost: Higher daylighting levels typically require higher initial investment, but offer long-term energy savings.
  • Occupant Comfort: Daylighting design must address glare, thermal comfort, and visual quality.
  • Sustainability: Maximizing daylighting contributes to green building certifications and reduced environmental impact.

6. Conclusion:

Achieving specific daylighting levels requires a comprehensive understanding of design principles, technologies, and performance metrics. While 50%, 75%, and 95% serve as useful benchmarks, the ultimate goal is to create spaces that are not only energy-efficient but also comfortable, healthy, and visually appealing for occupants. By carefully considering the strategies and challenges associated with each level, designers can create buildings that harness the power of natural light to its fullest potential.

7. Further Research:

  • Advanced daylighting modeling techniques.
  • Integration of daylighting with artificial lighting systems.
  • Long-term performance evaluation of daylighting strategies.

This white paper provides a general overview. Consulting with daylighting experts and utilizing daylight modeling software is recommended for specific project applications.

Industrial application of Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

You’re interested in how daylighting strategies are applied in industrial settings. Here’s a breakdown of how different daylighting percentages can be relevant in industrial applications:

Industrial Applications of Daylighting

Industrial facilities, such as factories, warehouses, and workshops, often have large floor areas and high ceilings, making them ideal candidates for daylighting. Effective daylighting can significantly reduce energy costs, improve worker productivity and safety, and enhance the overall work environment.

Daylighting Percentages in Industrial Settings

While the specific percentages of 50%, 75%, and 95% might not be explicitly targeted, the underlying principles of achieving those levels are highly relevant in industrial design:

  • 50% Daylighting (Basic Daylighting):
    • Application: Suitable for general manufacturing or storage areas where visual tasks are not highly critical.
    • Strategies:
      • Roof Monitors: These elevated windows on the roof can bring daylight into large spaces.
      • Clerestory Windows: High windows placed in walls can provide daylight while maintaining wall space for equipment.
      • Skylights: Simple, cost-effective way to introduce daylight from above.
    • Considerations:
      • May require supplemental artificial lighting to ensure adequate illumination for specific tasks.
      • Need to manage solar heat gain to avoid overheating.
  • 75% Daylighting (Enhanced Daylighting):
    • Application: Appropriate for areas with moderate visual demands, such as assembly lines or quality control areas.
    • Strategies:
      • Optimized Roof Monitors: Larger and more strategically placed roof monitors.
      • Sawtooth Roofs: These roofs with angled glazing provide diffuse daylight and minimize direct sunlight.
      • Light-Reflecting Surfaces: Use of reflective materials on ceilings and walls to distribute daylight.
    • Considerations:
      • Requires careful design to control glare and ensure uniform illumination.
      • May involve higher initial costs for specialized roofing systems.
  • 95% Daylighting (Advanced Daylighting):
    • Application: Ideal for tasks requiring high visual acuity, such as precision manufacturing or inspection areas.
    • Strategies:
      • Advanced Skylight Systems: Skylights with light-diffusing or redirecting technologies.
      • Light Pipes: These can bring daylight to areas far from windows or the roof.
      • Heliostats: These systems use mirrors to track the sun and direct sunlight into the building.
    • Considerations:
      • Requires significant investment in advanced technologies.
      • Needs careful integration with artificial lighting systems for consistent illumination.

Additional Industrial Daylighting Considerations:

  • Safety: Daylighting design must consider safety factors, such as preventing glare that could impair vision or cause accidents.
  • Thermal Comfort: Managing solar heat gain is crucial in industrial settings to maintain comfortable temperatures for workers.
  • Maintenance: Daylighting systems should be designed for easy maintenance and cleaning to ensure long-term performance.
  • Integration with Artificial Lighting: Daylighting should be integrated with artificial lighting systems to provide consistent and adequate illumination throughout the day.

Benefits of Daylighting in Industrial Settings:

  • Energy Savings: Reduced reliance on artificial lighting leads to lower electricity bills and operating costs.
  • Improved Productivity: Studies have shown that access to natural light can improve worker productivity and reduce absenteeism.
  • Enhanced Safety: Better visibility can reduce the risk of accidents and injuries.
  • Environmental Sustainability: Daylighting reduces the building’s carbon footprint and contributes to a greener environment.

By carefully considering the specific needs of their facility and implementing appropriate daylighting strategies, industrial building owners can reap significant benefits, both economically and environmentally.

Research and development of Daylighting 50%, 75%, 95% ?

The pursuit of effective daylighting in buildings, particularly achieving those aspirational levels of 50%, 75%, and 95%, is an active area of research and development. Here’s a glimpse into the key areas of focus:

1. Advanced Daylighting Technologies:

  • Light Pipes and Fiber Optics: These systems can transport daylight deep into building interiors, even to spaces without direct access to windows. Research is focused on improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of these technologies.
  • Heliostats and Sun Tracking Systems: These systems use mirrors to capture and redirect sunlight, maximizing daylight availability. Ongoing research aims to optimize their performance and integrate them seamlessly into building designs.
  • Anidolic Lighting Systems: These systems use specialized reflectors and diffusers to distribute daylight evenly and efficiently. Research is exploring new materials and designs to enhance their performance.

2. Building Materials and Components:

  • High-Performance Glazing: Research is focused on developing glazing materials with optimized light transmission, thermal insulation, and solar control properties. This includes exploring new coatings, films, and glazing assemblies.
  • Smart Windows: These windows can dynamically adjust their properties in response to sunlight, optimizing daylighting while minimizing solar heat gain. Research is ongoing to improve their performance, durability, and affordability.
  • Light-Reflecting Materials: Research is exploring new materials and coatings with high reflectivity to enhance daylight distribution within buildings.

3. Daylighting Design and Analysis Tools:

  • Daylight Modeling Software: Advanced software tools are being developed to simulate and analyze daylighting performance in buildings with greater accuracy and efficiency. This includes incorporating dynamic daylight conditions and complex building geometries.
  • Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR): These technologies are being used to visualize and experience daylighting in building designs, allowing architects and engineers to optimize daylighting strategies before construction.

4. Human Factors and Well-being:

  • Impact of Daylighting on Occupant Health: Research continues to explore the link between daylight exposure and various health outcomes, including circadian rhythms, mood, productivity, and sleep quality.
  • User Perception and Comfort: Studies are investigating how people perceive and experience daylight in buildings, aiming to optimize daylighting designs for occupant comfort and satisfaction.

5. Integration with Artificial Lighting:

  • Daylight-Responsive Lighting Controls: Research is focused on developing advanced lighting control systems that automatically adjust artificial lighting levels based on the availability of daylight, maximizing energy savings and visual comfort.
  • Human-Centric Lighting: This approach integrates daylighting with artificial lighting to create dynamic lighting environments that support human health and well-being.

6. Sustainability and Energy Efficiency:

  • Life-Cycle Assessment: Research is evaluating the environmental impact of daylighting technologies and strategies, considering factors such as material production, energy consumption, and end-of-life disposal.
  • Energy Modeling and Optimization: Daylighting is being integrated into building energy models to optimize overall building performance and reduce energy consumption.

7. Case Studies and Best Practices:

  • Real-world Case Studies: Researchers are documenting and analyzing successful daylighting projects to identify best practices and lessons learned.
  • Guidelines and Standards: Organizations are developing guidelines and standards for daylighting design, promoting the adoption of effective strategies and technologies.

Looking Ahead:

The future of daylighting research and development is likely to focus on:

  • Personalized Daylighting: Tailoring daylighting strategies to individual occupant needs and preferences.
  • Dynamic Daylighting: Creating building environments that respond dynamically to changing daylight conditions.
  • Integration with Smart Building Technologies: Combining daylighting with other smart building systems to optimize energy efficiency and occupant comfort.

By continuing to invest in research and development, we can unlock the full potential of daylighting to create buildings that are not only energy-efficient and sustainable but also promote the health and well-being of their occupants.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Reinhart, Christoph (2014). Daylighting Handbook 1. Christoph Reinhart. ISBN 9780692203637.
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b Spellman, Frank; Beiber, Revonna (2011). The Science of Renewable Energy. CRC Press; 1 edition. ISBN 978-1439825020.
  3. ^ [1] Archived January 17, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ Building for Energy Independence: Sun/Earth Buffering and Superinsulation. Community Builders. 1983. ISBN 978-0960442249.
  5. ^ Kent, Michael; Schiavon, Stefano (2020). “Evaluation of the effect of landscape distance seen in window views on visual satisfaction” (PDF). Building and Environment. 183: 107160. Bibcode:2020BuEnv.18307160K. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107160. S2CID 221935768. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
  6. ^ Ko, Won Hee; Kent, Michael; Schiavon, Stefano; Levitt, Brendon; Betti, Giovanni (2021). “A Window View Quality Assessment Framework”. LEUKOS. 18 (3): 268–293. arXiv:2010.07025. doi:10.1080/15502724.2021.1965889. S2CID 222341349. Retrieved 2021-11-30.
  7. ^ Kent, Michael; Schiavon, Stefano (2022). “Predicting Window View Preferences Using the Environmental Information Criteria”. LEUKOS. 19 (2): 190–209. doi:10.1080/15502724.2022.2077753. S2CID 251121476. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
  8. ^ “Energy Performance Label”. The National Fenestration Rating Council. 20 July 2016. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
  9. ^ Jump up to:a b c CIBSE Lighting Guide 10: Daylighting and window design. CIBSE. 1999. ISBN 978-0-900953-98-9.
  10. ^ Asdrubali, F. (2003). “Lighting Research and Technology: “Daylighting performance of sawtooth roofs of industrial buildings “”. Lighting Research and Technology. 35 (4): 343–359. doi:10.1191/1365782803li094oa. S2CID 109902823.
  11. ^ “Definition of LAYLIGHT”.
  12. ^ “Single Laylight Combines Natural, Artificial Light in Seating Area”. 9 June 2016.
  13. ^ “Library’s Historic Laylight Removed for Restoration”. 30 March 2012. Archived from the original on 23 October 2022. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  14. ^ “A Museum owned by Artists”. Museum Work: Including the Proceedings of the American Association of Museums. 4 (1). American Association of Museums: 47. 1921.
  15. ^ “What is the Difference Between Skylights, Veluxes, and Roof Windows? | Information Blog Post | First Class Roofing Service”. Archived from the original on 2022-10-23. Retrieved 2021-10-19.
  16. ^ “The future is bright”. 3 December 2015.
  17. ^ “Sloped Glazing | WBDG – Whole Building Design Guide”.
  18. ^ “Answer Man sheds some light on curious glass panels at the U.S. Capitol – The Washington Post”. The Washington Post.
  19. ^ Jump up to:a b c d The SLL Lighting Handbook. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers; 1st edition. 2009. ISBN 9781906846022.
  20. ^ Littlefair, P.J.; Aizlewood, M.E. (1998). Daylighting in atrium buildings. BRE Information Paper IP3/98. ISBN 9781860811944.
  21. ^ Sharples, S. (1999). “Reflectance distributions and atrium daylight levels: a model study”. Lighting Research and Technology. 31 (4): 165–170. doi:10.1177/096032719903100405. S2CID 110668116.
  22. ^ “MVRDV integrates terra-cotta brick and glass for a facade in Amsterdam – Archpaper.com”. archpaper.com. 2016-04-21. Retrieved 2017-11-06.
  23. ^ “MVRDV replaces traditional facade with glass bricks that are stronger than concrete”. Dezeen. 2016-04-20. Retrieved 2017-11-06.
  24. ^ “Glass bricks “stronger than concrete” clad Amsterdam’s Crystal Houses”. Retrieved 2017-11-06.
  25. ^ “See-through concrete: LiTracon”. The Future of Design. 14 November 2014.
  26. ^ SOUMYAJIT PAUL; AVIK DUTTA (October 2013). “TRANSLUCENT CONCRETE” (PDF). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 3. ISSN 2250-3153.
  27. ^ “Anidolic Daylight Concentrator of Structural Translucent Concrete Envelope” (PDF). Sinberbest.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 4 August 2018.
  28. ^ Littlefair, P.J. (1990). “Review Paper: Innovative daylighting: Review of systems and evaluation methods”. Lighting Research and Technology. 22: 1–17. doi:10.1177/096032719002200101. S2CID 108501995.
  29. ^ Littlefair, P.J. (1995). “Light shelves: Computer assessment of daylighting”. Lighting Research and Technology. 27 (2): 79–91. doi:10.1177/14771535950270020201. S2CID 111215708.
  30. ^ Jump up to:a b “Prism Glass | glassian”. Glassian.org. Retrieved 2017-11-06.
  31. ^ Noblis. “EW-201014 Fact Sheet”. Serdp-Estcp.org. Retrieved 2017-11-06.
  32. ^ Active Daylighting Archived February 2, 2010, at the Wayback Machine retrieved 9 February 2009
  33. ^ “A new strategy for EUCLIDES subdegree solar tracking”. Archived from the original on 2010-04-06. Retrieved 2020-09-12.
  34. ^ Baetens, R.; Jelle, B. P.; Gustavsen, A. (2010). “Properties, requirements and possibilities of smart windows for dynamic daylight and solar energy control in buildings: A state-of-the-art review”. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 94 (2): 87–105. Bibcode:2010SEMSC..94…87B. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2009.08.021. hdl:11250/2473860.
  35. ^ Lee, E.S.; Tavil, A. (2007). “Energy and visual comfort performance of electrochromic windows with overhangs”. Building and Environment. 42 (6): 2439–2449. Bibcode:2007BuEnv..42.2439L. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.016.
  36. ^ Muhs, Jeff. “Design and Analysis of Hybrid Solar Lighting and Full-Spectrum Solar Energy Systems” (PDF). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-11-28. Retrieved 2007-12-23.
  37. ^ Aries, M.B.C.; Aarts, M. P. J.; Van Hoof, J. (2015). “Daylight and health: A review of the evidence and consequences for the built environment”. Lighting Research and Technology. 47: 6–27. doi:10.1177/1477153513509258. S2CID 55898304.
  38. ^ Borisuit, A; Linhart, F. (2015). “Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood”. Lighting Research and Technology. 47 (2): 192–209. doi:10.1177/1477153514531518. S2CID 52463366.
  39. ^ Figueiro, M.G.; Rea, M.S.; Bullough, J.D. (2006). “Does architectural lighting contribute to breast cancer?”. Journal of Carcinogenesis. 5 (1): 20. doi:10.1186/1477-3163-5-20. PMC 1557490. PMID 16901343.
  40. ^ Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). Illumination Engineering Society. 2013. ISBN 9780879952723.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b Performance Measurement Protocols for Commercial Buildings. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, U.S. Green Building Council and The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 2010. ISBN 9781933742793.
  42. ^ Jump up to:a b Reinhart, Christoph; Mardaljevic, John & Rogers, Zach (2006). “Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design” (PDF). Leukos. 3 (1): 7–31. doi:10.1582/LEUKOS.2006.03.01.001. S2CID 18653435. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Jakubiec, J.A.; Reinhart, C.F. (2012). “The ‘adaptive zone’ – A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces”. Lighting Research and Technology. 44 (2): 149–170. doi:10.1177/1477153511420097. S2CID 110072060.
  44. ^ Nabil, Azza; Mardaljevic, John (2006). “Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors”. Energy and Buildings. 38 (7): 1858–1866. Bibcode:2006EneBu..38..905N. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013.
  45. ^ Kent, Michael; Schiavon, Stefano; Jakubiec, Alstan (2020). “A dimensionality reduction method to select the most representative daylight illuminance distributions”. Journal of Building Performance Simulation. 13 (1): 122–135. doi:10.1080/19401493.2019.1711456. S2CID 211093664.
  46. ^ Jump up to:a b Rea, Mark (2000). IESNA Lighting Handbook (9th ed.). Illuminating Engineering; 9 edition (July 2000). ISBN 978-0879951504.
  47.  Haines, Julia (6 November 2023). “Which Countries Observe Daylight Saving Time?”. US News & World Report. Retrieved 4 November 2024.
  48. ^ “No DST in Most of Arizona”.
  49. ^ “Did Ben Franklin Invent Daylight Saving Time?”. The Franklin Institute. 7 July 2017. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
  50. ^ “Full text – Benjamin Franklin – The Journal of Paris, 1784”. www.webexhibits.org. Archived from the original on 15 November 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b Gibbs, George. “Hudson, George Vernon”. Dictionary of New Zealand Biography. Ministry for Culture and Heritage. Retrieved 22 March 2015.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b Ogle, Vanessa (2015). The Global Transformation of Time: 1870–1950. Harvard University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-674-28614-6. Archived from the original on 22 March 2021. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b “Time to change your clocks – but why?”. Northern Ontario Travel. 8 March 2018. Archived from the original on 10 October 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2018.
  54. ^ Jump up to:a b Daylight Saving Time, archived from the original on 9 October 2018, retrieved 8 October 2018
  55. ^ “Daylight savings time”. Session Weekly. Minnesota House Public Information Office. 1991. Archived from the original on 16 June 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2013.
  56. ^ Jump up to:a b “Single/Double Summer Time policy paper” (PDF). Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. October 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 September 2012.
  57. ^ Jump up to:a b G. V. Hudson (1895). “On seasonal time-adjustment in countries south of lat. 30°”. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute. 28: 734. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 3 April 2009.
  58. ^ Jump up to:a b Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 115–118.
  59. ^ Mikkelson, David (13 March 2016). “Daylight Saving Time”. Snopes. Retrieved 17 October 2016.
  60. ^ Jump up to:a b “100 years of British Summer Time”. National Maritime Museum. 2008. Archived from the original on 28 December 2014.
  61. ^ Yuhas, Alan (6 March 2024). “When Is Daylight Saving Time?”. The New York Times. Retrieved 20 March 2024. One of the oldest arguments for daylight saving time is that it can save energy costs. There have been many conflicting studies about whether actually it does.
  62. ^ Visé, Daniel de (3 November 2023). “Is Daylight saving time a scam? Time, money may not be saved”. USA TODAY. Retrieved 20 March 2024.  … researchers announced that the nation had reduced its energy consumption by an annual rate of 0.03%. The meager savings came in reduced electricity consumption in the evenings during the extra days of daylight time. Other research, however, has suggested the reverse: The semiannual time shift exacts a cost, and daylight time nets little or no savings.
  63. ^ Eggimann Sven, Robin Mutschler, Kristina Orehounig, Massimo Fiorentini (2023), “Climate change shifts the trade-off between lower cooling and higher heating demand from daylight saving time in office buildings”, Environmental Research Letters, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 024001, Bibcode:2023ERL….18b4001E, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acb0e3, ISSN 1748-9326
  64. ^ Swanson, Anna (11 March 2016). “Why daylight saving time isn’t as terrible as people think”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 March 2018. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
  65. ^ Berthold (1918). “Daylight saving in ancient Rome”. The Classical Journal. 13 (6): 450–451.
  66. ^ Jérôme Carcopino (1968). “The days and hours of the Roman calendar”. Daily Life in Ancient Rome: The People and the City at the Height of the Empire. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-00031-3.
  67. ^ Robert Kaplan (2003). “The holy mountain”. The Atlantic. 292 (5): 138–141.
  68. ^ Hertzel Hillel Yitzhak (2006). “When to recite the blessing”. Tzel HeHarim: Tzitzit. Nanuet, NY: Feldheim. pp. 53–58. ISBN 978-1-58330-292-7.
  69. ^ Manser, Martin H. (2007). The Facts on File dictionary of proverbs. Infobase Publishing. p. 70. ISBN 978-0816066735. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2011.
  70. ^ Benjamin Franklin; William Temple Franklin; William Duane (1834). Memoirs of Benjamin Franklin. McCarty & Davis. p. 477. Archived from the original on 1 February 2017. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  71. ^ Seymour Stanton Block (2006). “Benjamin Franklin: America’s inventor”. American History. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2009.
  72. ^ Benjamin Franklin, writing anonymously (26 April 1784). “Aux auteurs du Journal”. Journal de Paris (in French) (117): 511–513. Its first publication was in the journal’s “Économie” section in a French translation. The revised English version Archived 15 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine [cited 13 February 2009] is commonly called “An Economical Project”, a title that is not Franklin’s; see A.O. Aldridge (1956). “Franklin’s essay on daylight saving”. American Literature. 28 (1): 23–29. doi:10.2307/2922719. ISSN 0002-9831. JSTOR 2922719.
  73. ^ Eviatar Zerubavel (1982). “The standardization of time: a sociohistorical perspective”. The American Journal of Sociology. 88 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1086/227631. S2CID 144994119.
  74. ^ Luxan, Manuel (1810). Reglamento para el gobierno interior de las Cortes (PDF). Congreso de los Diputados. Cadiz. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 September 2018.
  75. ^ Martín Olalla, José María (3 September 2018). “La gestión de la estacionalidad”. El Mundo (in Spanish). Unidad Editorial. Archived from the original on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
  76. ^ G. V. Hudson (1898). “On seasonal time”. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute. 31: 577–588. Archived from the original on 23 May 2010. Retrieved 3 April 2009.
  77. ^ Lee, L. P. (1 October 1947). “New Zealand time”. New Zealand Geographer. 3 (2): 198. Bibcode:1947NZGeo…3..197L. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7939.1947.tb01466.x.
  78. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), p. 3.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b William Willett (1907). The waste of daylight (1st ed.). Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2009 – via Daylight Saving Time.
  80. ^ “Daylight Saving Bill”. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. 12 February 1908. col. 155–156.
  81. ^ Moro, Teviah (16 July 2009). “Faded Memories for Sale”. Orillia Packet and Times. Orillia, Ontario. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  82. ^ League of Nations (20 October 1923). Regulation of summer time (PDF). Geneva. pp. 5, 22–24. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 October 2020. Retrieved 4 September 2020.
  83. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 51–89.
  84. ^ Jump up to:a b c Feltman, Rachel (6 March 2015). “Perspective | Five myths about daylight saving time”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Victor, Daniel (11 March 2016). “Daylight Saving Time: Why Does It Exist? (It’s Not for Farming)”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  86. ^ Jump up to:a b c Klein, Christopher. “8 Things You May Not Know About Daylight Saving Time”. .History.com. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  87. ^ Jump up to:a b “When Daylight Saving Time Was Year-Round”. Time. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b c A Time-Change Timeline, National Public Radio, 8 March 2007
  89. ^ Graphics, WSJ com News. “World War I Centenary: Daylight-Saving Time”. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  90. ^ Grebinski, Leisha (4 March 2024). “Why doesn’t Saskatchewan change its clocks?”. CBC. Retrieved 3 December 2024.
  91. ^ “Information for visitors”. Lord Howe Island Tourism Association. Archived from the original on 3 May 2009. Retrieved 20 April 2009.
  92. ^ “Time Zone & Clock Changes in Troll Station, Antarctica”. timeanddate.com. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  93. ^ “Time Zone Abbreviations – Worldwide List”, timeanddate.com, archived from the original on 21 August 2018, retrieved 14 May 2020
  94. ^ MacRobert, Alan (18 July 2006). “Time in the Sky and the Amateur Astronomer”. Sky and Telescope. Archived from the original on 11 July 2020. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  95. ^ “Standard Time (Amendment) Act, 1971, Section 1”. electronic Irish Statute Book. Archived from the original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  96. ^ “Time Zones in Ireland”. timeanddate.com. Archived from the original on 31 December 2019. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  97. ^ “Time Zones in the United Kingdom”. timeanddate.com. Archived from the original on 8 July 2020. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  98. ^ Kasraoui, Safaa (16 April 2019). “Morocco to Switch Clocks Back 1 Hour on May 5 for Ramadan”. Morocco World News. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. Retrieved 5 June 2019.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b “Release of the Moroccan Official Journal” (PDF) (Press release) (in Arabic). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 October 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  100. ^ “Time Zones in Morocco”. timeanddate.com. Archived from the original on 27 June 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  101. ^ National Physical Laboratory (31 March 2016). “At what time should clocks go forward or back for summer time (FAQ – Time)”. Archived from the original on 11 October 2016. Retrieved 17 October 2016. The time at which summer time begins and ends is given in the relevant EU Directive and UK Statutory Instrument as 1 am. Greenwich Mean Time (GMT)… All time signals are based on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which can be almost one second ahead of, or behind, GMT so there is a brief period in the UK when the directive is not being strictly followed.
  102. ^ Jump up to:a b c Joseph Myers (17 July 2009). “History of legal time in Britain”.
  103. ^ Tom Baldwin (12 March 2007). “US gets summertime blues as the clocks go forward 3 weeks early”. The Times. London. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 2 November 2018.
  104. ^ “Historia Hora Oficial de Chile” (in Spanish). Chilean Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service. 1 October 2008. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  105. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 179–180.
  106. ^ “Why Arizona doesn’t observe daylight-saving time”. USA Today. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
  107. ^ Downing, Michael (2018). “One Hundred Years Later, the Madness of Daylight Saving Time Endures”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on 19 February 2020. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  108. ^ Korch, Travers (2015). “The Financial History of Daylight Saving”. Bankrate. Archived from the original on 11 July 2020. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  109. ^ “Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58 § 110”. 8 August 2005. Archived from the original on 16 July 2009. Retrieved 11 July 2007.
  110. ^ Morgan, Thad (2017). “The Sweet Relationship Between Daylight Saving Time and Halloween”. History. Archived from the original on 12 May 2020. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  111. ^ “Implementation dates of daylight saving time within Australia”. Bureau of Meteorology. 22 September 2009. Archived from the original on 4 April 2016. Retrieved 11 July 2007.
  112. ^ Jump up to:ab DST practices and controversies:
  113. ^ Winston S. Churchill (28 April 1934). “A silent toast to William Willett”. Pictorial Weekly.
  114. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), p. 117.
  115. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. “God’s time” 106, 135, 154, 175, “religious” 208, “Jews” 212, “Israel” 221-222.
  116. ^ Jump up to:abc
  117. ^ Jump up to:abc
  118. ^ Jump up to:a b c Fitzpatrick, Kyle (21 October 2019). “When do the clocks change around the world? And why?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 1 November 2020. Retrieved 4 December 2020. Most Islamic countries do not use daylight saving time as during Ramadan it can mean that the evening dinner is delayed till later in the day.
  119. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), p. xi.
  120. ^ Slattery, Sir Matthew (1972). The National Bank, 1835–1970 (Privately published ed.). The National Bank.
  121. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 12–24.
  122. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 72–73.
  123. ^ Jump up to:a b Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 51–70.
  124. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 80–101.
  125. ^ “Time Changes in Berlin Over the Years”. timeanddate.com. Archived from the original on 27 May 2019. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  126. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 103–110.
  127. ^ Robert Garland (1927). Ten years of daylight saving from the Pittsburgh standpoint. Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh. OCLC 30022847. Archived from the original on 28 September 2006.
  128. ^ Spring Forward (2005), pp. 47–48.
  129. ^ David P. Baron (2005). “The politics of the extension of daylight saving time”. Business and its Environment (5th ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-187355-1.
  130. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. 147–155, 175–180.
  131. ^ Ian R. Bartky; Elizabeth Harrison (1979). “Standard and daylight-saving time”. Scientific American. 240 (5): 46–53. Bibcode:1979SciAm.240e..46B. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0579-46. ISSN 0036-8733.
  132. ^ Murray, David. “‘Chaos of time’: The history of daylight saving time, why we spring forward”. Great Falls Tribune. Archived from the original on 20 January 2021. Retrieved 9 November 2020.
  133. ^ “Twin cities disagree over daylight savings time, 1965”. St. Cloud Times. 5 May 1965. p. 1. Archived from the original on 10 November 2020. Retrieved 9 November 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  134. ^ James C. Benfield (24 May 2001). “Statement to the U.S. House, Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Energy”. Energy Conservation Potential of Extended and Double Daylight Saving Time. Serial 107-30. Archived from the original on 25 August 2007. Retrieved 11 March 2007.
  135. ^ “1992 Queensland Daylight Saving Referendum” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 25 July 2010.
  136. ^ Alex Beam (26 July 2005). “Dim-witted proposal for daylight time”. Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  137. ^ “Daylight Saving group launched as new Qld political party”. ABC News. 14 December 2008. Archived from the original on 4 January 2009. Retrieved 25 July 2010.
  138. ^ “Total Candidates Nominated for Election by Party – 2009 State Election”. Electoral Commission of Queensland (ECQ). Archived from the original on 26 February 2011. Retrieved 19 June 2010.
  139. ^ Paige Taylor (18 May 2009). “Daylight saving at a sunset out west”. The Australian. Archived from the original on 27 October 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  140. ^ “Daylight Saving for South East Queensland Referendum Bill 2010” (PDF). 14 April 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 June 2010. Retrieved 25 July 2010.
  141. ^ “Daylight saving silence ‘deafening'”. 16 June 2011. Archived from the original on 18 June 2011. Retrieved 19 June 2011.
  142. ^ Time and Date (19 September 2011). “Eternal Daylight Saving Time (DST) in Belarus”. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  143. ^ “Russia abandons year-round daylight-saving time”. AP. 1 July 2014. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
  144. ^ “Russian clocks go back for last time”. BBC. 25 October 2014. Archived from the original on 26 October 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  145. ^ Jump up to:a b “Daylight Saving Time State Legislation”. National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  146. ^ Buckle, Anne. “No DST in Most of Arizona”. timeanddate.com. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
  147. ^ Jump up to:a b Howell, Tom Jr. (21 December 2022). “Rubio to keep fighting for permanent daylight saving time after clock runs out for this Congress”. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  148. ^ Perlmutter, Lillian (27 October 2022). “Mexico falls back but won’t spring forward as summer time abolished”. The Guardian. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
  149. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), pp. “Jews” 212, “Israel” 221-222.
  150. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), p. 221.
  151. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), p. 212.
  152. ^ Jump up to:a b Seize the Daylight (2005), p. 22.
  153. ^ Goodman, A, Page, A, Cooper, A (23 October 2014). “Daylight saving time as a potential public health intervention: an observational study of evening daylight and objectively-measured physical activity among 23,000 children from 9 countries”. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 11: 84. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-84. PMC 4364628. PMID 25341643. S2CID 298351.
  154. ^ Jump up to:a b “Tired of turning clocks forward and back? You have big business to thank”. CBC News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2020. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  155. ^ Choi, Charles (2009), Does Daylight Saving Time Conserve Energy?, New York, NY, USA: Scientific American, archived from the original on 30 January 2014
  156. ^ Dilip R. Ahuja; D. P. Sen Gupta; V. K. Agrawal (2007). “Energy savings from advancing the Indian Standard Time by half an hour” (PDF). Current Science. 93 (3): 298–302. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 February 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  157. ^ Jump up to:a b Myriam B.C. Aries; Guy R. Newsham (2008). “Effect of daylight saving time on lighting energy use: a literature review”. Energy Policy. 36 (6): 1858–1866. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.021. Archived from the original on 26 October 2019. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  158. ^ Havranek, Tomas; Herman, Dominik; Irsova, Zuzana (1 June 2018). “Does Daylight Saving Save Electricity? A Meta-Analysis”. The Energy Journal. 39 (2): 35–61. doi:10.5547/01956574.39.2.thav. ISSN 1944-9089. S2CID 58919134.
  159. ^ Irsova, Zuzana; Havranek, Tomas; Herman, Dominik (2 December 2017). “Daylight saving saves no energy”. VoxEU.org. Archived from the original on 3 December 2017. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  160. ^ David B. Belzer; Stanton W. Hadley; Shih-Miao Chin (2008). Impact of Extended Daylight Saving Time on national energy consumption: report to Congress, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 110 (PDF) (Report). US Dept. of Energy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 May 2013.
  161. ^ Roscoe G. Bartlett (24 May 2001). “Statement to the US House, Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Energy”. Energy Conservation Potential of Extended and Double Daylight Saving Time. Serial 107-30. Archived from the original on 25 August 2007. Retrieved 11 March 2007.
  162. ^ Mark J. Kamstra; Lisa A. Kramer; Maurice D. Levi (2000). “Losing sleep at the market: the daylight saving anomaly” (PDF). American Economic Review. 90 (4): 1005–1011. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.714.2833. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.1005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2017. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
  163. ^ Luisa Müller; Dirk Schiereck; Marc W. Simpson; Christian Voigt (2009). “Daylight saving effect”. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 19 (2): 127–138. doi:10.1016/j.mulfin.2008.09.001.
  164. ^ Michael J. Pinegar (2002). “Losing sleep at the market: Comment”. American Economic Review. 92 (4): 1251–1256. doi:10.1257/00028280260344786. JSTOR 3083313. S2CID 16002134.
  165. ^ Mark J. Kamstra; Lisa A. Kramer; Maurice D. Levi (2002). “Losing sleep at the market: the daylight saving anomaly: Reply”. American Economic Review. 92 (4): 1257–1263. doi:10.1257/00028280260344795. JSTOR 3083314.
  166. ^ Zhang, H.; Khan, A.; Edgren, G.; Rzhetsky, A. (8 June 2020). “Measurable health effects associated with the daylight saving time shift”. PLOS Comput. Biol. 16 (6): e1007927. Bibcode:2020PLSCB..16E7927Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007927. PMC 7302868. PMID 32511231.
  167. ^ Rishi, M. A.; Ahmed, O.; Barrantes Perez, J. H.; Berneking, J.; Flynn-Evans, E. E.; Gurubhagavatula, I. (2020). “Daylight saving time: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement”. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 16 (10): 1781–1784. doi:10.5664/jcsm.8780. PMC 7954020. PMID 32844740.
  168. ^ Roenneberg T, Wirz-Justice A, Skene DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Wright KP, Dijk DJ, Zee P, Gorman MR, Winnebeck EC, Klerman EB (2019). “Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?”. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 34 (3): 227–230. doi:10.1177/0748730419854197. PMC 7205184. PMID 31170882.
  169. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Brian Handwerk (1 December 2013). “Time to Move On? The Case Against Daylight Saving Time”. National Geographic News. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  170. ^ Fritz, Josef; VoPham, Trang; Wright, Kenneth P.; Vetter, Céline (February 2020). “A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Traffic Accident Risk”. Current Biology. 30 (4): 729–735.e2. Bibcode:2020CBio…30E.729F. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.045. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 32008905. S2CID 210956409.
  171. ^ Orsini, Federico; Zarantonello, Lisa; Costa, Rodolfo; Rossi, Riccardo; Montagnese, Sara (July 2022). “Driving simulator performance worsens after the Spring transition to Daylight Saving Time”. iScience. 25 (7): 104666. Bibcode:2022iSci…25j4666O. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104666. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 9263509. PMID 35811844.
  172. ^ Smith, Austin C. (2016). “Spring Forward at Your Own Risk: Daylight Saving Time and Fatal Vehicle Crashes”. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 8 (2): 65–91. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.676.1062. doi:10.1257/app.20140100. ISSN 1945-7782.
  173. ^ Fritz, Josef (2020). “A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Traffic Accident Risk”. Current Biology. 30 (4): 729–735.e2. Bibcode:2020CBio…30E.729F. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.045. PMID 32008905. S2CID 210956409.
  174. ^ Jason Varughese; Richard P. Allen (2001). “Fatal accidents following changes in daylight savings time: the American experience”. Sleep Medicine. 2 (1): 31–36. doi:10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00032-0. PMID 11152980.
  175. ^ J. Alsousoua; T. Jenks; O. Bouamra; F. Lecky; K. Willett (2009). “Daylight savings time (DST) transition: the effect on serious or fatal road traffic collision related injuries”. Injury Extra. 40 (10): 211–212. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.06.241.
  176. ^ Tuuli A. Lahti; Jari Haukka; Jouko Lönnqvist; Timo Partonen (2008). “Daylight saving time transitions and hospital treatments due to accidents or manic episodes”. BMC Public Health. 8: 74. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-74. PMC 2266740. PMID 18302734.
  177. ^ Mats Lambe; Peter Cummings (2000). “The shift to and from daylight savings time and motor vehicle crashes”. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 32 (4): 609–611. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00088-3. PMID 10868764.
  178. ^ Sandhu, Amneet; Seth, Milan; Gurm, Hitinder S. (1 March 2014). “Daylight savings time and myocardial infarction”. Open Heart. 1 (1): e000019. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2013-000019. ISSN 2053-3624. PMC 4189320. PMID 25332784.
  179. ^ Fritz, Josef; VoPham, Trang; Wright Jr., Kenneth P.; Vetter, Céline (30 January 2020). “A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Traffic Accident Risk”. Current Biology. 30 (4): 729–735.e2. Bibcode:2020CBio…30E.729F. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.045. PMID 32008905.
  180. ^ Manfredini, F.; Fabbian, F.; Cappadona, R. (2018). “Daylight saving time, circadian rhythms, and cardiovascular health”. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 13 (5): 641–646. doi:10.1007/s11739-018-1900-4. PMC 6469828. PMID 29971599.
  181. ^ Derks, L.; Houterman, S.; Geuzebroek, G.S.C. (2021). “Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands”. Netherlands Heart Journal. 29 (9): 427–432. doi:10.1007/s12471-021-01566-7. PMC 8397810. PMID 33765223.
  182. ^ Jump up to:a b Cermakian, Nicolas (2 November 2019). “Turn back the clock on Daylight Savings: Why Standard Time all year round is the healthy choice”. The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 20 October 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  183. ^ Jump up to:a b Block, Gene. “Who wants to go to work in the dark? Californians need Permanent Standard Time”. The Sacramento Bee. Archived from the original on 4 March 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  184. ^ Jump up to:a b Antle, Michael (30 October 2019). “Circadian rhythm expert argues against permanent daylight saving time”. U Calgary News. Archived from the original on 4 March 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  185. ^ Jump up to:a b “Year-round daylight time will cause ‘permanent jet lag,’ sleep experts warn in letter to government”. CBC News. 31 October 2019. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  186. ^ Barnes, Christopher M.; Drake, Christopher L. (November 2015). “Prioritizing Sleep Health”. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10 (6): 733–737. doi:10.1177/1745691615598509. PMID 26581727.
  187. ^ Tuuli A. Lahti; Sami Leppämäki; Jouko Lönnqvist; Timo Partonen (2008). “Transitions into and out of daylight saving time compromise sleep and the rest–activity cycles”. BMC Physiology. 8: 3. doi:10.1186/1472-6793-8-3. PMC 2259373. PMID 18269740.
  188. ^ DST and circadian rhythm:
  189. ^ Rick Kissell (20 March 2007). “Daylight-saving dock ratings”. Variety. Archived from the original on 13 April 2009. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  190. ^ Todd D. Rakoff (2002). A Time for Every Purpose: Law and the Balance of Life. Harvard University Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-674-00910-3.
  191. ^ Rachel Pain; Robert MacFarlane; Keith Turner; Sally Gill (2006). “‘When, where, if, and but’: qualifying GIS and the effect of streetlighting on crime and fear”. Environment and Planning A. 38 (11): 2055–2074. Bibcode:2006EnPlA..38.2055P. doi:10.1068/a38391. S2CID 143511067.
  192. ^ Downing, Michael (9 March 2018). “One Hundred Years Later, the Madness of Daylight Saving Time Endures”. Smithsonian. Archived from the original on 11 March 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018. Today we know that changing the clocks does influence our behavior. For example, later sunset times have dramatically increased participation in afterschool sports programs and attendance at professional sports events. In 1920, The Washington Post reported that golf ball sales in 1918—the first year of daylight saving—increased by 20 percent.
  193. ^ Dana Knight (17 April 2006). “Daylight-saving time becomes daylight-spending time for many businesses”. Indianapolis Star.
  194. ^ Bradley, Barbara (3 April 1987). “For business, Daylight Saving Time is daylight spending time”. The Christian Science Monitor.
  195. ^ Simon, Eti Ben; Vallat, Raphael; Rossi, Aubrey; Walker, Matthew P. (23 August 2022). “Sleep loss leads to the withdrawal of human helping across individuals, groups, and large-scale societies”. PLOS Biology. 20 (8): e3001733. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001733. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 9398015. PMID 35998121.
  196. ^ Cho, Kyoungmin; Barnes, Christopher M.; Guanara, Cristiano L. (13 December 2016). “Sleepy Punishers Are Harsh Punishers”. Psychological Science. 28 (2): 242–247. doi:10.1177/0956797616678437. ISSN 0956-7976. PMID 28182529. S2CID 11321574.
  197. ^ Joey Crandall (24 October 2003). “Daylight saving time ends Sunday”. Record–Courier. Archived from the original on 29 February 2012.
  198. ^ Paul McDougall (1 March 2007). “PG&E says patching meters for an early daylight-saving time will cost $38 million”. InformationWeek. Archived from the original on 6 December 2008. Retrieved 13 February 2009.
  199. ^ “Daylight saving time: rationale and original idea”. 2008. Archived from the original on 9 June 2016. Retrieved 13 February 2009. … Lord Balfour came forward with a unique concern: ‘Supposing some unfortunate lady was confined with twins …’
  200. ^ “Should we change the clocks?”. National Farmers Union. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  201. ^ Crossen, Cynthia (6 November 2003). “Daylight Saving Time Pitted Farmers Against The ‘Idle’ City Folk”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 28 March 2021. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  202. ^ Effect on those whose hours are set by the sun:
  203. ^ Jesse Ruderman (1 November 2006). “Continuous daylight saving time”. Archived from the original on 4 May 2016. Retrieved 21 March 2007.
  204. ^ “Proposal for a finer adjustment of summer time (daylight saving time)”. 28 September 2011. Archived from the original on 8 October 2011. Retrieved 28 September 2011.
  205. ^ Albert E. Waugh (1973). Sundials: Their Theory and Construction. Dover. Bibcode:1973sttc.book…..W. ISBN 978-0-486-22947-8.
  206. ^ Leith Holloway (1992). “Atmospheric sun protection factor on clear days: its observed dependence on solar zenith angle and its relevance to the shadow guideline for sun protection”. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 56 (2): 229–234. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb02151.x. PMID 1502267. S2CID 1219032. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  207. ^ Seize the Daylight (2005), p. xv.
  208. ^Daylight saving time and its variants:
  209. ^ Garner, Bryan A. (2000). “daylight saving(s) time”. Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style. Oxford University Press. p. 95. ISBN 9780195135084. Archived from the original on 9 November 2021. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  210. ^ “Remember to Put Clocks Hour Ahead on Retiring”. Brooklyn Citizen. 25 April 1936. Archived from the original on 8 November 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
  211. ^ Steve Lohr (5 March 2007). “Time change a ‘mini-Y2K’ in tech terms”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 February 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
  212. ^ A. Gut; L. Miclea; Sz. Enyedi; M. Abrudean; I. Hoka (2006). “Database globalization in enterprise applications”. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics. pp. 356–359.
  213. ^ Ron Bean (November 2000). “The Clock Mini-HOWTO”. Archived from the original on 13 January 2012. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  214. ^ Raymond Chen (November 2000). “Why does Windows keep your BIOS clock on local time?”. Archived from the original on 3 January 2012. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  215. ^ Paul Eggert; Arthur David Olson (30 June 2008). “Sources for time zone and daylight saving time data”. Archived from the original on 23 June 2012.
  216. ^ “tztab(4)” (PDF). HP-UX Reference: HP-UX 11i Version 3. Hewlett–Packard Co. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 September 2013.
  217. ^ “Other environment variables”. IEEE Std 1003.1–2004. The Open Group. 2004. Archived from the original on 6 July 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2007.
  218. ^ Parfitt, Tom (25 March 2011). “Think of the cows: clocks go forward for the last time in Russia”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 5 January 2012.
  219. ^ Hollingshead, Iain (June 2006). “Whatever happened to Double Summer Time?”. The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 22 March 2021. Retrieved 18 March 2017.
  220. ^ “Russia set to turn back the clocks with daylight-saving time shift”. The Guardian. London. 1 July 2014. Archived from the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  221. ^ “Turkey will not turn back the clock for daylight saving time”. Daily Sabah. 7 December 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2022.
  222. ^ “Press corner”. European Commission. 12 September 2018. Archived from the original on 23 October 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
  223. ^ “European parliament votes to scrap daylight saving time from 2021”. The Guardian (US ed.). London. 26 March 2019. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019. Retrieved 9 July 2019.
  224. ^ “To the EU Commission on DST” (PDF). March 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
  225. ^ “Seasonal clock change in the EU”. Mobility and Transport – European Commission. 22 September 2016. Archived from the original on 30 June 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
  226. ^ Posaner, Joshua; Cokelaere, Hanne (24 October 2020). “Stopping the clock on seasonal time changes? Not anytime soon”. Politico. Archived from the original on 26 October 2020. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  227. ^ Lawson, Patrick (18 November 2020). “The plan to abolish the time change is “completely blocked” at European level, says specialist in European issues”. Geads News. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021.
  228. ^ “Fall back! Daylight saving time ends Sunday”. USA Today. 1 November 2018. Archived from the original on 2 November 2018. Retrieved 2 November 2018.
  229. ^ “Rubio’s Bill to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent Passes Senate”. rubio.senate.gov. 15 March 2022. Retrieved 15 June 2022.
  230. ^ Haughey, John (18 September 2022). “Time – and money – at stake in Florida-led proposal to extend daylight saving”. The Center Square Florida. Retrieved 3 January 2023. The Florida Chamber of Commerce and state business associations maintain an extra hour of sunlight in the winter, during peak tourist season, would translate into more sales.
  231. ^ McLeod, Paul (17 March 2022). “Everyone Was Surprised By The Senate Passing Permanent Daylight Saving Time. Especially The Senators”. BuzzFeed. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  232. ^ Schnell, Mychael (25 July 2022). “Permanent daylight saving time hits brick wall in House”. The Hill. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  233. ^ Handwerk, Brian (6 November 2011). “Permanent Daylight Saving Time? Might Boost Tourism, Efficiency”. National Geographic. Archived from the original on 9 April 2019. Retrieved 5 January 2012.
  234. ^ Team, The Health News (4 November 2022). “Is Daylight Saving Time Good or Bad? | Sharp HealthCare”. www.sharp.com. Retrieved 4 December 2024.
  235. ^ Kernan, Megan (18 March 2022). “Sleep experts weigh in on Senate approving bill to make Daylight Saving Time permanent”. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
  236. ^ Roenneberg, Till; Wirz-Justice, Anna; Skene, Debra J; etc. (6 June 2019). “Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?”. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 34 (3): 227–230. doi:10.1177/0748730419854197. PMC 7205184. PMID 31170882.
  237. ^ Roenneberg, Till; Winnebeck, Eva C.; Klerman, Elizabeth B. (7 August 2019). “Daylight Saving Time and Artificial Time Zones – A Battle Between Biological and Social Times”. Frontiers in Physiology. 10: 944. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00944. PMC 6692659. PMID 31447685.
  238. ^ Rishi, Muhammad Adeel; Ahmed, Omer; Barrantes Perez, Jairo H.; etc. (15 October 2020). “Daylight saving time: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement”. J Clin Sleep Med. 16 (10): 1781–1784. doi:10.5664/jcsm.8780. PMC 7954020. PMID 32844740. S2CID 221329004.
  239. ^ “American Academy of Sleep Medicine opposes permanent daylight saving time bill”. 23 May 2022. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  240. ^ “American Academy of Sleep Medicine calls for elimination of daylight saving time”. 27 August 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  241. ^ Davies, Claire (14 March 2021). “Sleep Awareness Week 2021: Over 70% say daylight saving time change doesn’t affect sleep”. TopTenReviews. Retrieved 11 January 2023.
  242. ^ Jump up to:a b “States Object to Changing the Clocks for Daylight Saving Time”. Almanac.com. 6 January 2023. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
  243. ^ “Daylight Saving Time: Americans want to stay permanently ‘sprung forward’ and not ‘fall back’ | YouGov”. today.yougov.com. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  244. ^ “Daylight Saving Time vs Standard Time”. 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
  245. ^ “Dislike for changing the clocks persists”. 2021. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
  246. ^ Ripley, Anthony (1 October 1974). “Senate Votes Return to Standard Time For Four Months and Sends Bill to Ford”. The New York Times. Retrieved 7 January 2023.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »