All inclusive Plan ?

Could you please clarify what you are looking for an all-inclusive plan for? Are you interested in hotels, flights, or something else?

• A travel package with everything included (flights, hotels, meals, activities)?
• A business service package covering multiple offerings?
• A certification or training plan that includes all courses and materials?
• Something else?

What is All inclusive Plan ?

An “all-inclusive plan” typically refers to a vacation package, most commonly at resorts, where a single upfront price covers a wide range of services and amenities. Here’s a breakdown of what that generally entails:

• Accommodation: This is the core of any travel package, including your hotel room or suite.
• Food and Drinks:
  • This usually includes all meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and sometimes snacks) at the resort’s various restaurants.
  • Often, it also encompasses beverages, including both non-alcoholic (soda, juice, coffee) and alcoholic drinks. However, the specific types and brands of alcoholic beverages included can vary significantly.
• Entertainment and Activities:
  • Many all-inclusive resorts offer a range of on-site activities, such as swimming pools, water sports (like snorkeling or kayaking), and fitness centers.
  • They may also provide entertainment, such as live music, shows, or organized games.
• Other Potential Inclusions:
  • Some higher-end all-inclusive resorts may include additional perks, such as spa treatments, golf green fees, or excursions.
  • Sometimes, depending on the package, airport transfers can be included.

Key things to remember:

• Variations Exist: The exact inclusions can vary greatly between resorts and packages. Always carefully review the details of any all-inclusive plan before booking.
• “All” Doesn’t Always Mean “Everything”: Some premium services or experiences might still come at an extra cost, even in an all-inclusive setup.

Essentially, an all-inclusive plan aims to provide a hassle-free vacation experience where you can relax and enjoy yourself without constantly worrying about additional expenses.

Who is required All inclusive Plan ?

All-inclusive plans appeal to a wide range of travelers, but some find them particularly beneficial. Here’s a breakdown of who might find an all-inclusive plan ideal:

• Families:
  • With kids, budgeting for meals and activities can be challenging. All-inclusive plans simplify this, allowing families to enjoy their vacation without constant worry about expenses.
  • Many resorts offer kids’ clubs and activities, providing entertainment for children of all ages.
• Couples seeking relaxation:
  • All-inclusive resorts offer a stress-free environment where couples can unwind and enjoy each other’s company.
  • Adults-only resorts provide a tranquil atmosphere for romantic getaways.
• Groups:
  • Whether it’s a friends’ trip, a family reunion, or a destination wedding, all-inclusive plans make it easy to coordinate activities and meals.
  • Having everything included simplifies splitting costs and ensures everyone has access to food and drinks.
• Budget-conscious travelers:
  • Knowing the total cost upfront allows travelers to manage their expenses effectively.
  • For those who plan to eat and drink frequently, an all-inclusive plan can often be more cost-effective than paying for individual meals and drinks.
• Those wanting a hassle-free vacation:
  • If you prefer to stay in one location and avoid planning every detail, an all-inclusive resort offers a convenient and relaxing experience.
  • People who want to limit the amount of decision making that needs to be done on vacation.

Essentially, anyone who values convenience, predictability, and relaxation can benefit from an all-inclusive plan.

When is required All inclusive Plan ?

It’s less about “requiring” an all-inclusive plan and more about when it becomes a highly desirable or practical choice. Here are some scenarios where an all-inclusive plan is often very beneficial:

• When you want a stress-free vacation:
  • If you’re looking to completely unwind and avoid the hassle of planning meals and activities, an all-inclusive resort takes care of those details.
• When you’re on a budget:
  • Knowing the total cost upfront helps you manage your expenses and avoid unexpected bills. This is especially helpful for families or groups.
• When you’re traveling with children:
  • All-inclusive resorts often have kids’ clubs and activities, and having meals included simplifies feeding picky eaters.
• When you’re planning a group trip:
  • Whether it’s a family reunion, a friends’ getaway, or a destination wedding, all-inclusive plans make it easy to coordinate expenses.
• When you want to stay in one location:
  • If you prefer to relax by the pool or beach rather than explore the surrounding area, an all-inclusive resort provides everything you need on-site.
• When you want to indulge:
  • Many people like the option of eating and drinking as much as they want, without the worry of a running tab.
• For certain travel destinations:
  • In some locations, especially in the Caribbean and Mexico, all-inclusive resorts are very common, and it can be a very cost effective way to travel.

In essence, an all-inclusive plan is ideal when you prioritize convenience, budget control, and relaxation.

COURTESY : TravelTime

Where is required All inclusive Plan ?

All-inclusive plans are particularly prevalent and popular in certain travel destinations, especially those focused on beach vacations and resort experiences. Here are some of the most common places where you’ll find a wide array of all-inclusive options:

• The Caribbean:
  • Destinations like the Dominican Republic (especially Punta Cana), Jamaica, and many other Caribbean islands are renowned for their all-inclusive resorts. These locations offer beautiful beaches, warm weather, and a relaxed atmosphere, making them ideal for all-inclusive getaways.
• Mexico:
  • Mexico’s popular resort areas, such as Cancun, Riviera Maya, and Puerto Vallarta, are also major hubs for all-inclusive resorts. These destinations cater to a wide range of travelers, from families to couples seeking romantic getaways.
• Central America:
  • Costa Rica and Panama are increasingly offering all-inclusive options, often combining beach experiences with eco-tourism and adventure activities.

Here’s why these locations are so popular for all-inclusive plans:

• Beachfront Locations:
  • Many all-inclusive resorts are situated on prime beachfront locations, providing easy access to beautiful beaches and water activities.
• Tourism Infrastructure:
  • These destinations have well-developed tourism infrastructure, with a wide range of resorts and amenities to choose from.
• Relaxation and Convenience:
  • The all-inclusive concept aligns perfectly with the desire for a relaxing and hassle-free vacation in these tropical paradises.

While these are some of the most prominent areas, you can find all-inclusive resorts in other parts of the world as well.

How is required All inclusive Plan ?

Booking an all-inclusive plan involves several steps, and there are various avenues you can take. Here’s a breakdown of how it’s typically done:

1. Research and Destination Selection:

• Determine your priorities:
  • What kind of experience are you looking for? (Relaxing, adventurous, family-friendly, romantic)
  • What’s your budget?
  • What amenities are essential? (Specific dining options, kids’ clubs, spa, etc.)
• Choose a destination:
  • Consider popular all-inclusive destinations like the Caribbean, Mexico, or Central America.
  • Research different resorts within your chosen destination.
• Read reviews:
  • Check online reviews from reputable sources to get insights into the quality of resorts.

2. Booking Options:

• Travel Agents:
  • Travel agents can provide personalized recommendations and handle the booking process.
  • They often have access to exclusive deals and packages.
• Online Travel Agencies:
  • Websites like Expedia, Booking.com, and others offer a wide range of all-inclusive packages.
  • These platforms allow you to compare prices and options easily.
• Directly with the Resort:
  • Booking directly with the resort’s website can sometimes offer advantages, such as exclusive deals or loyalty program benefits.

3. Key Considerations During Booking:

• Carefully review the package details:
  • Understand what’s included and what’s not.
  • Pay attention to restrictions on dining, drinks, and activities.
• Check for hidden fees:
  • Clarify whether taxes, gratuities, and other fees are included.
• Consider travel insurance:
  • Protect your investment with travel insurance that covers cancellations, medical emergencies, and other unforeseen events.
• Booking timing:
  • Booking during off seasons, or utilizing early bird specials can greatly reduce costs.
  • Last minute deals can also be found, but that carries a level of risk.
• Read the fine print:
  • Cancellation policies, and refund information is very important to understand.

In summary:

The process involves careful research, consideration of your needs and budget, and choosing a booking method that suits you. By paying close attention to the details, you can ensure a smooth and enjoyable all-inclusive vacation.

Case study is All inclusive Plan ?

When examining “all-inclusive plans” as a case study, it’s essential to look at it from various perspectives, including:

1. Historical Development:

• Origins:
  • The concept’s roots can be traced to early holiday camps, like those developed by Butlin’s in the UK during the 1930s.
  • Club Med played a significant role in popularizing the all-inclusive model globally in the 1950s.
• Evolution:
  • The all-inclusive model has adapted over time, with variations in offerings and target markets.
  • Its expansion has been closely tied to the growth of mass tourism, particularly in destinations like the Caribbean and Mexico.

2. Economic Impact:

• Benefits for Resorts:
  • Predictable revenue streams.
  • Increased occupancy rates.
  • Opportunities for upselling premium services.
• Impact on Local Economies:
  • Debates exist regarding the “multiplier effect” of all-inclusive resorts. Some argue that they limit spending outside the resort, reducing benefits for local businesses.
  • However, they also create employment opportunities.
• Consumer Value:
  • Provides budget certainty for travelers.
  • Offers convenience and stress-free vacations.

3. Sociocultural Considerations:

• Tourist Behavior:
  • All-inclusive resorts can influence tourist behavior, sometimes leading to a focus on on-site activities and limited interaction with the local culture.
• Sustainability:
  • Concerns exist about the environmental impact of large-scale all-inclusive resorts.
  • Efforts are being made to promote more sustainable practices.
• Destination image:
  • The all inclusive model can greatly effect the image of a destination, for better or worse.

4. Operational Challenges:

• Cost Management:
  • Resorts must carefully manage costs to ensure profitability.
  • This includes controlling food and beverage expenses, as well as managing entertainment and activities.
• Quality Control:
  • Maintaining consistent quality across all aspects of the all-inclusive experience is crucial.
• Customer Satisfaction:
  • Meeting the diverse needs and expectations of guests is essential for success.

Key areas of study:

• The economic impact of all-inclusive resorts on local communities.
• The sustainability of all-inclusive tourism.
• The evolution of the all-inclusive model and its adaptation to changing consumer preferences.
• The effects of all inclusive resorts on local culture.

By examining these aspects, a comprehensive case study of all-inclusive plans can provide valuable insights into the tourism industry.

COURTESY : KHM Travel Group

White paper on All inclusive Plan ?

White Paper: The Evolving Landscape of All-Inclusive Travel

Abstract:

The all-inclusive travel model has undergone significant transformations since its inception. This white paper examines the current state of all-inclusive plans, exploring its economic impact, sociocultural implications, operational challenges, and future trends. It analyzes the evolving consumer expectations and the industry’s response to sustainability and personalization. Furthermore, it provides insights for stakeholders, including resorts, travel agencies, and policymakers, to navigate the complexities of this dynamic sector.

1. Introduction:

The all-inclusive concept, initially rooted in providing convenience and value, has become a dominant force in the tourism industry. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the all-inclusive model, moving beyond its basic definition to explore its multifaceted dimensions.

2. Historical Context and Evolution:

• Early Beginnings: From holiday camps to the pioneering efforts of Club Med, the all-inclusive model has evolved from a niche offering to a mainstream travel choice.
• Mass Tourism and Expansion: The growth of mass tourism in the latter half of the 20th century fueled the expansion of all-inclusive resorts, particularly in Caribbean and Mexican destinations.
• Diversification and Segmentation: The industry has witnessed increasing segmentation, with resorts catering to specific demographics, such as families, couples, and luxury travelers.

3. Economic Impact:

• Revenue Generation and Employment: All-inclusive resorts contribute significantly to local economies through direct employment and indirect revenue generation.
• Economic Leakage and Local Businesses: Concerns regarding the economic leakage, where a significant portion of tourist spending remains within the resort, are addressed.
• Investment and Infrastructure Development: The all-inclusive model has driven infrastructure development in many tourist destinations.
• The effects of economic downturns: How all inclusive resorts react to recessions and other economic troubles.

4. Sociocultural Implications:

• Tourist-Host Interactions: The impact of all-inclusive resorts on tourist-host interactions and cultural exchange is examined.
• Cultural Commodification: The potential for cultural commodification and the need for responsible tourism practices are discussed.
• Community Engagement: Case studies of resorts that actively engage with local communities and promote sustainable tourism are presented.
• The effect of mass tourism on local cultures.

5. Operational Challenges:

• Cost Management and Efficiency: Effective cost management, particularly in food and beverage operations, is crucial for profitability.
• Quality Control and Customer Satisfaction: Maintaining consistent quality across all aspects of the all-inclusive experience is essential.
• Staffing and Training: The importance of well-trained and motivated staff in delivering exceptional service is highlighted.
• Supply chain management: How resorts are dealing with supply chain issues.

6. Sustainability and Environmental Impact:

• Environmental Concerns: The environmental impact of large-scale all-inclusive resorts, including waste management and energy consumption, is addressed.
• Sustainable Practices: The adoption of sustainable practices, such as renewable energy, water conservation, and waste reduction, is explored.
• Ecotourism and Responsible Travel: The integration of ecotourism principles into the all-inclusive model is discussed.
• The rise of “green” all inclusive resorts.

7. Technological Advancements and Personalization:

• Digital Transformation: The role of technology in enhancing the all-inclusive experience, including mobile apps, online booking, and personalized services, is examined.
• Personalization and Customization: The increasing demand for personalized experiences and the industry’s response to this trend are analyzed.
• Data Analytics and Customer Insights: The use of data analytics to understand customer preferences and improve service delivery is discussed.
• The use of AI within the all inclusive experience.

8. Future Trends and Recommendations:

• Emerging Markets: The growth potential of all-inclusive resorts in emerging markets is explored.
• Niche Markets and Specialization: The continued growth of niche markets, such as wellness retreats and adventure resorts, is anticipated.
• Recommendations for Stakeholders:
  • Resorts: Emphasize sustainability, personalization, and community engagement.
  • Travel Agencies: Provide transparent information and promote responsible tourism practices.
  • Policymakers: Develop regulations that promote sustainable tourism and protect local communities.
• The effects of possible future pandemics on the all inclusive industry.

9. Conclusion:

The all-inclusive travel model continues to evolve, adapting to changing consumer expectations and addressing emerging challenges. By embracing sustainability, leveraging technology, and prioritizing customer satisfaction, the industry can ensure its long-term viability and contribute to the responsible development of tourism.

Note: This is a framework for a white paper. Each section would need to be expanded with detailed research, data, and analysis.

Industrial application of All inclusive Plan ?

While “all-inclusive plans” are most commonly associated with the hospitality and tourism industries, the underlying principles can be applied to various industrial contexts. Here’s how the concept translates and its potential applications:

Core Principles and Industrial Adaptations:

• Bundling Services:
  • In industry, this translates to offering comprehensive service packages that include maintenance, repairs, training, and software updates, all for a fixed fee. This is common in:
    • Equipment Manufacturing: Companies that sell heavy machinery often offer “all-inclusive” maintenance contracts.
    • Software as a Service (SaaS): SaaS models are inherently “all-inclusive,” providing software access, updates, and support for a recurring subscription.
• Predictable Costing:
  • Industries benefit from predictable costs for budgeting and financial planning.
  • “All-inclusive” contracts allow businesses to accurately forecast expenses related to:
    • Facility Management: Contracts that cover all building maintenance, utilities, and security.
    • IT Services: Managed IT services that provide comprehensive support for hardware, software, and cybersecurity.
• Streamlined Operations:
  • By outsourcing non-core functions to “all-inclusive” providers, businesses can focus on their core competencies.
  • This applies to:
    • Logistics: Third-party logistics (3PL) providers offer “all-inclusive” supply chain management services.
    • Human Resources: Payroll, benefits administration, and recruitment can be bundled into “all-inclusive” HR packages.
• Risk Mitigation:
  • “All-inclusive” contracts can transfer risk to the service provider.
  • For example:
    • Environmental Remediation: Companies may enter into contracts that cover all costs associated with cleaning up contaminated sites.
    • Cybersecurity: Managed security service providers (MSSPs) offer “all-inclusive” protection against cyber threats.

Examples of Industrial Applications:

• Manufacturing:
  • Equipment manufacturers offering comprehensive service agreements that include preventive maintenance, repairs, and parts replacement.
• Information Technology:
  • Managed IT service providers offering “all-inclusive” packages that cover network security, data backup, and technical support.
• Construction:
  • “Design-build” contracts that bundle design and construction services into a single package.
• Energy:
  • Energy service companies (ESCOs) offering “all-inclusive” energy efficiency solutions that include audits, equipment upgrades, and maintenance.

Key Considerations:

• Contract Clarity: Clear and detailed contracts are essential to define the scope of services and avoid disputes.
• Performance Metrics: Establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the “all-inclusive” plan.
• Flexibility: Ensuring that the “all-inclusive” plan can be adapted to changing business needs.

By adapting the core principles of “all-inclusive” plans, industries can achieve greater cost predictability, operational efficiency, and risk mitigation.

Research and development of All inclusive Plan ?

The research and development of “all-inclusive plans” is a dynamic process, driven by evolving consumer demands, technological advancements, and a growing emphasis on sustainability. Here’s a look at key areas of R&D:

1. Consumer Behavior and Personalization:

• Data Analytics:
  • Resorts and travel agencies are increasingly using data analytics to understand consumer preferences, personalize experiences, and optimize service delivery.
  • This includes analyzing booking patterns, on-site activities, dining preferences, and feedback to tailor offerings.
• Personalized Experiences:
  • R&D focuses on creating customized packages and experiences that cater to individual needs and interests.
  • This may involve offering personalized dining options, tailored activity schedules, and customized spa treatments.
• Understanding Evolving Demands:
  • Continual research is being done to track how customers expectations are changing. This includes things like the desire for more authentic cultural experiences, and also the desire for more high tech experiences.

2. Technology and Innovation:

• Mobile Technology:
  • Development of mobile apps that enhance the guest experience, providing access to resort information, online booking, and personalized services.
• Artificial Intelligence (AI):
  • Integration of AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants to provide instant customer support and personalized recommendations.
  • Use of AI to optimize resource management, predict demand, and improve operational efficiency.
• Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR):
  • Exploration of VR/AR technologies to provide immersive travel experiences and virtual tours of resorts.
  • Potential use of AR for on-site navigation and information delivery.

3. Sustainability and Responsible Tourism:

• Environmental Impact Reduction:
  • Research and development of sustainable practices, such as renewable energy, water conservation, and waste reduction.
  • Development of eco-friendly resort designs and operations.
• Community Engagement:
  • Exploration of ways to integrate local communities into the all-inclusive experience, promoting cultural exchange and economic benefits.
  • Development of responsible tourism initiatives that support local businesses and protect cultural heritage.
• Sustainable Sourcing:
  • Research into how to provide locally sourced food and beverages, and other goods, to reduce the carbon foot print of the resorts.

4. Operational Efficiency and Cost Management:

• Supply Chain Optimization:
  • Development of efficient supply chain management systems to reduce costs and minimize waste.
• Energy Efficiency:
  • Research and development of energy-efficient technologies and practices to reduce operational costs and environmental impact.
• Automation:
  • Implementing automation into different parts of the resorts, to increase efficiency, and reduce costs.

Key R&D Trends:

• Increased focus on personalized and immersive experiences.
• Growing emphasis on sustainability and responsible tourism.
• Rapid integration of technology and AI.
• Continuous efforts to optimize operational efficiency and cost management.

By investing in research and development, the all-inclusive industry can adapt to changing consumer demands, improve its sustainability practices, and enhance the overall guest experience.

COURTESY : Jamie Wolfer

References

1. ^ Palmer, Kimberly (February 7, 2012). “The Financial Benefits of All-Inclusive Resorts”. U.S. News & World Report.
2. ^ “About We Review Resorts”. We Review Resorts. Retrieved 2022-06-21.
3. ^ “About We Review Resorts”. We Review Resorts. Retrieved 2022-06-21.
4. ^ Club Med + Skift Present: The Evolution of the All-Inclusive Resort (PDF). 2015.
5.  “All Inclusive Care for the Elderly”. www.dhcs.ca.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-12.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Polska, Urszula (2017-03-01). “The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): The Innovative and Economically Viable Model of American Geriatric Care”. Pielegniarstwo XXI Wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century. 16 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1515/pielxxiw-2017-0008. ISSN 2450-646X.
7. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k} “The History of PACE | National PACE Association”. www.npaonline.org. Retrieved 2021-09-10.
8. ^ Gregg, Judd (2006-02-08). “S.1932 – 109th Congress (2005-2006): Deficit Reduction Act of 2005”. www.congress.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-10.
9. ^ “Rural PACE® Provider Grant Program | National PACE Association”. www.npaonline.org. Retrieved 2021-09-10.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b Gonzalez, Lori (2017). “A Focus on the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)”. Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 29 (5): 475–490. doi:10.1080/08959420.2017.1281092. PMID 28085633. S2CID 6378863.
11. ^ “Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly | Medicaid”. www.medicaid.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-12.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d “PACE | CMS”. www.cms.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-13.
13. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} “PACE | Medicare”. www.medicare.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-13.
14. ^ Jump up to:^a b “What Is PACE?”. www.seniorsbluebook.com. Retrieved 2021-09-13.
15. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly Benefits | Medicaid”. www.medicaid.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-13.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b “PACE health care in California is honored”. 2019-09-20. Retrieved 2021-09-13.
17. ^ “PACEFinder: Find a PACE Program in Your Neighborhood | National PACE Association”. www.npaonline.org. Retrieved 2021-09-13.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d “An Overview of PACE and How the Genesis of This Critical Solution For Seniors was Inspired by a Local Community Effort in San Francisco Over 40-years Ago – CiminoCare”. www.ciminocare.com. 31 October 2019. Retrieved 2021-09-13.
19. ^ Hirth, Victor; Baskins, Judith; Dever-Bumba, Maureen (March 2009). “Program of All-Inclusive Care (PACE): Past, Present, and Future”. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 10 (3): 155–160. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2008.12.002. ISSN 1525-8610. PMID 19233054.
20. ^ Friedman, S. M.; Steinwachs, D. M.; Rathouz, P. J.; Burton, L. C.; Mukamel, D. B. (2005-04-01). “Characteristics Predicting Nursing Home Admission in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for Elderly People”. The Gerontologist. 45 (2): 157–166. doi:10.1093/geront/45.2.157. ISSN 0016-9013. PMID 15799980.
21. ^ Grabowski, David C. (February 2006). “The Cost-Effectiveness of Noninstitutional Long-Term Care Services: Review and Synthesis of the Most Recent Evidence”. Medical Care Research and Review. 63 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1177/1077558705283120. ISSN 1077-5587. PMID 16686071. S2CID 29427385.
22. ^ Mukamel, D. B.; Temkin-Greener, H.; Delavan, R.; Peterson, D. R.; Gross, D.; Kunitz, S.; Williams, T. F. (2006-04-01). “Team Performance and Risk-Adjusted Health Outcomes in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)”. The Gerontologist. 46 (2): 227–237. doi:10.1093/geront/46.2.227. ISSN 0016-9013. PMID 16581887.
23. ^ Sands, L. P.; Yaffe, K.; Lui, L.-Y.; Stewart, A.; Eng, C.; Covinsky, K. (2002-07-01). “The Effects of Acute Illness on ADL Decline Over 1 Year in Frail Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Impairment”. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 57 (7): M449 – M454. doi:10.1093/gerona/57.7.m449. ISSN 1079-5006. PMID 12084807.
24. ^ Temkin-Greener, Helena; Mukamel, Dana B. (January 2002). “Predicting Place of Death in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): Participant versus Program Characteristics”. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 50 (1): 125–135. doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50018.x. ISSN 0002-8614. PMID 12028257. S2CID 8128177.
25. ^ Wieland, Darryl; Lamb, Vicki L.; Sutton, Shae R.; Boland, Rebecca; Clark, Marleen; Friedman, Susan; Brummel-Smith, Kenneth; Eleazer, G. Paul (November 2000). “Hospitalization in the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): Rates, Concomitants, and Predictors”. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 48 (11): 1373–1380. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02625.x. ISSN 0002-8614. PMID 11083311. S2CID 34732766.
26. ^ “Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)”, Health Care Policy and Politics A to Z, CQ Press, 2009, doi:10.4135/9781452240121.n316, ISBN 9780872897762, retrieved 2021-09-13
27. Qvortrup, Ane; Qvortrup, Lars (2018). “Inclusion: Dimensions of inclusion in education”. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 22 (7): 803–817. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1412506.
28. ^ Allen, K.E., Schwartz, I
29. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scheyer et al. (1996). The Inclusive Classroom Teacher Created Materials, Inc. The Inclusive Classroom
30. ^ “What is Inclusive Design”. Inclusive Design Research Centre. OCAD University. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
31. ^ Wilkinson, Richard; Pickett, Kate (2010). The Spirit Level- Why Equity is Better for Everyone (2010 ed.). England: Penguin Books. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-241-95429-4.
32. ^ “SDG4’s 10 targets”. Global Campaign For Education. Retrieved 2020-09-22.
33. ^ Taylor, S.J. & Ferguson, D. (1985). A summary of strategies utilized in model programs and resource materials. In: S. Stainback & W. Stainback, Integration of Students with Severe Handicaps in Regular Schools. Washington, DC: The Council for Exceptional Children.
34. ^ Schnorr, Roberta F. (1 December 1990). “‘Peter? He comes and goes…’: First Graders’ Perspectives on a Part-Time Mainstream Student”. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 15 (4): 231–240. doi:10.1177/154079699001500402. S2CID 144209228.
35. ^ Forest, M. (1986, winter). Education Integration/Integracion Scolaire. Entourage, 1(1): 19-23.
36. ^ Sapon-Shevin, M., Ayres, B., & Duncan, J. (1994). Cooperative learning and inclusion. In: J. S. Thousand, R.A. Villa, & A.I. Nevins, Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers. (pp. 45-58). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
37. ^ Biklen, D. (1985). Achieving the Complete School: Strategies for Effective Mainsreaming. NY, NY: Teachers College Press.
38. ^ Salisbury, Christine L.; Palombaro, Mary M.; Hollowood, Tia M. (June 1993). “On the Nature and Change of an Inclusive Elementary School”. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 18 (2): 75–84. doi:10.1177/154079699301800201. S2CID 145006119.
39. ^ Hunt, Pam; Goetz, Lori; Anderson, Jacki (June 1986). “The Quality of IEP Objectives Associated with Placement on Integrated versus Segregated School Sites”. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 11 (2): 125–130. doi:10.1177/154079698601100206. S2CID 38591577.
40. ^ Snell, Martha E.; Browder, Diane M. (1 March 1986). “Community-Referenced Instruction: Research and Issues”. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 11 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1177/154079698601100101. S2CID 141111103.
41. ^ Wolfe, Pamela S. (1 March 1994). “Judgment of the Social Validity of Instructional Strategies Used in Community-Based Instructional Sites”. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 19 (1): 43–51. doi:10.1177/154079699401900105. S2CID 144392134.
42. ^ Racino, J. (1999). Table 6.3: Curriculum for students with severe handicaps. Personnel Preparation in Disability and Community Life: Toward Universal Approaches to Support. (p. 134). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.
43. ^ Ford, A. & Davern, L. (1989). Moving forward on school integration: Strategies for involving studennt with severe disabilities in the life of the school. In: R. Gaylord-Ross, Integration Strategies for Persons with Handicaps. (pp. 11-31). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
44. ^ Brown, Lou; Schwarz, Patrick; Udvari-Solner, Alice; Kampschroer, Elise Frattura; Johnson, Fran; Jorgensen, Jack; Gruenewald, Lee (1 March 1991). “How Much Time Should Students with Severe Intellectual Disabilities Spend in Regular Education Classrooms and Elsewhere?”. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 16 (1): 39–47. doi:10.1177/154079699101600105. S2CID 143551059.
45. ^ Tapasak, Renée C.; Walther-Thomas, Christine S. (1 July 1999). “Evaluation of a First-Year Inclusion Program: Student Perceptions and Classroom Performance”. Remedial and Special Education. 20 (4): 216–225. doi:10.1177/074193259902000405. S2CID 145754888.
46. ^ This list from the Utah Education Association.
47. ^ Strully, J., & Strully, C. (1996). Friendships as an educational goal: What we have learned and where we are headed. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Inclusion: A guide for educators. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
48. ^ “How to Support Special Needs Students”. PhDinSpecialEducation.com. Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
49. ^ Zelkowitz, Alyssa. “Strategies for Special Education and Inclusion Classrooms”. Scholastic. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
50. ^ Wehman, P. (1997). Exceptional Individuals in School, Community and Work. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
51. ^ Coulter, D., Bacon, A., Birenbaum, A., Campbell, V., Cerreto, M., Corbin, S., Crocker, A., Krahn, G., McClain, C., McDermott, Nehring, W., Pietrangelo, R., Rader, R., Spitalnik, D. & White-Scott, S.(2005). Comprehensive health support and health promotion. (pp.109-124). In: K. C. Lakin & A. Turnbull, National Goals and Research for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Washington, DC: The Arc of the US and American Association on Mental Retardation.
52. ^ Davis, William E. (1 February 1989). “The Regular Education Initiative Debate: Its Promises and Problems”. Exceptional Children. 55 (5): 440–446. doi:10.1177/001440298905500507. S2CID 143074474.
53. ^ Kauffman, James M. (1 October 1989). “The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush Education Policy: A Trickle-Down Theory of Education of the Hard-to-Teach”. The Journal of Special Education. 23 (3): 256–278. doi:10.1177/002246698902300303. S2CID 145553280.
54. ^ Stainback, William; Stainback, Susan (1 October 1984). “A Rationale for the Merger of Special and Regular Education”. Exceptional Children. 51 (2): 102–111. doi:10.1177/001440298405100201. PMID 6238827. S2CID 10352809.
55. ^ Knoll, J. & Meyer, L. (1986). Principles and practices for school integration of students with severe disabilities: An overview of the literature. In: M. Berres & P. Knoblock, Managerial Models of Mainstreaming. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
56. ^ Brown, L., Long, E., Udvari-Solner, A., Schwarz, P., VenDeventer, P., et al. (1989, Spring). Should students with severe intellectual disabilities be based in regular or in special education classrooms in home schools? Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14(1): 8-12.
57. ^ Sailor, W. (1991, November/December). Special education in the restructured school. Remedial and Special Education, 12(6): 8-22.
58. ^ Sage, D.D. (1996). Administrative strategies for achieving inclusive schooling. (pp. 105-116). In: S. Stainback & W. Stainback, Inclusion: A Guide for Educators. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
59. ^ Powell, Donna; Hyle, Adrienne E. (1 May 1997). “Principals and School Reform: Barriers to Inclusion in Three Secondary Schools”. Journal of School Leadership. 7 (3): 301–326. doi:10.1177/105268469700700305. S2CID 151297919.
60. ^ Bellamy, T.G. (1989). Book Review of D. K. Liptsky and A. Gartner, School Reform for All Students: An Essay Review of Beyond Separate Education: Quality Education for All. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
61. ^ Racino, J., (1999). Personnel Preparation in Disability and Community Life: Toward Universal Approaches to Support. (p. 219). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.
62. ^ Stainback, W. & Stainback, W. C. (1989). Classroom organization for diversity among students. In: D. Biklen, D. Ferguson & Al Ford, Schooling and Disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. ^ Jorgensen, C. & Tashie, C. (2000). Turning points: The story of high school inclusion in New Hampshire. (pp. 131-176). In: J. Nisbet & D. Hagner, Part of the Community. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
64. ^ Fried, R.L. & Jorgensen, C.M (1998). Equity and excellence: Finding common ground between inclusive education and school reform. In: C. M. Jorgensen, Restructuring High School For All Students. (pp. 15–28). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
65. ^ Forest, M. & Pearpoint, J.. (1992). MAPS: Action planning. (pp. 52–56). In: J. Pearpoint, M. Forest, & J. Snow, The Inclusion Papers: Strategies to Make Inclusion Work. Toronto, Canada: The Inclusion Press.
66. ^ O’Brien, J. & Lyle O’Brien, C. (1996). Inclusion as a force for school renewal. In : S. Stainback & W. Stainback, Inclusion: A Guide for Educators. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
67. ^ “Inclusion definition – Dictionary – MSN Encarta”. Archived from the original on February 23, 2009. Retrieved November 1, 2009. Definition of inclusion, accessed October 11, 2007. 2009-10-31.
68. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g} Bowe, Frank. (2005). Making Inclusion Work. Merrill Education/Prentice Hall.
69. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Understanding Psychology Eighth Edition”, Feldman, Robert S. (2008), page 309. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
70. ^ Student teachers’ attitudes toward the inclusion of children with special needs. Educational Psychology, Hastings. R.P., & Oakford, S. (2003), page 23, 87-95
71. ^ Mainstreaming to full inclusion: From orthogenesis to pathogenesis of an idea. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, Kavale, K.A. (2002), page 49, 201-214.
72. ^ Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, Praisner, C. L. (2003), page 69, 135-145.
73. ^ Racino, J. (1999). Policy, Program Evaluation and Research in Disability: Community Support for All. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
74. ^ Dunst, C.J. & Trivette, C.M. (2012). Capacity-building family-system intervention practices. (pp. 33–57). In: G.H. S. Singer, Biegel, D.E. & Conway, P., Family Support and Family Caregiving across Disabilities. London & NY, NY: Routledge.
75. ^ Jorgensen, C., Schuh, M., & Nisbet, J. (2005). The inclusion facilitator’s guide. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
76. ^ “Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 – Table 4: Number and percentage of homeschooled students whose parents reported particular reasons for homeschooling as being applicable to their situation and as being their most important reason for homeschooling: 2003”.
77. ^ Trentin G. & Benigno V. (Eds) (2013). Network Technology and Homebound Inclusive Education. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, ISBN 978-1-62808-537-2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256483536_Network_Technology_and_Homebound_Inclusive_Education/
78. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Kommer, David (2016). “Considerations for Gender-Friendly Classrooms”. Middle School Journal. 38 (2): 43–49. doi:10.1080/00940771.2006.11461573. S2CID 153302028.
79. ^ American Association of University Women (1992), How schools shortchange girls’, New York
80. ^ “Education”. Gender Spectrum. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
81. ^ Jump up to:^a b “LGBT-Inclusive Curriculum Guide for Educators”. GLSEN. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
82. ^ Snapp, Shannon D.; Burdge, Hilary; Licona, Adela C.; Moody, Raymond L.; Russell, Stephen T. (2015). “Students’ Perspectives on LGBTQ-Inclusive Curriculum”. Equity & Excellence in Education. 48 (2): 249–265. doi:10.1080/10665684.2015.1025614. S2CID 145521118.
83. ^ Pearce, Lynne (2017). “Making nurse education LGBT-Friendly”. Nursing Standard. 31 (23): 22–24. doi:10.7748/ns.31.23.22.s23. PMID 28145168.
84. ^ “Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education” (PDF). UNESCO.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b UNESCO (2009) Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. UNESCO: Paris. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001778/177849e.pdf
86. ^ Harry, B. (1992). Cultural Diversity, Families and the Special Education System. NY, NY: Teachers College Press.
87. ^ Cross, T.B., Bazron, B. & Dennis, K. W. (1989). Towards Culturally Competent System of Care. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center.
88. ^ “Training and Advisory Services – Equity Assistance Centers”. 1 August 2016.
89. ^ “Home – The Equity Alliance”.
90. ^ Ladson-Billings, B. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory Into Practice, 31(4), 312-320.
91. ^ http://www.bps.org.uk/downloadfile.cfm?file_uuid=CE1DCB9D-1143-DFD0-7EA9-5C1B82EA4596&ext=doc British Psychological Society position statement on inclusive education
92. ^ Patton, M. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY, The Guilford Press.
93. ^ “Inclusive Education | EDUCATION | UNESCO”. Archived from the original on September 21, 2009. Retrieved October 22, 2009.
94. ^ Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs. (PDF-File, 198 KB)