Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

The term “Coordinated Plan Interaction” relates to how different entities, whether they are agents in a computer system, organizations, or even individuals, work together to achieve a common goal. It emphasizes the need for those entities to align their plans and actions. Here’s a breakdown of what that generally entails:

Key Concepts:

• Coordination:
  • This involves aligning the actions of multiple entities to ensure they work together effectively.
  • It requires communication, information sharing, and often, some form of agreed-upon structure.
• Plan Interaction:
  • This highlights the fact that each entity may have its own individual plan, but these plans must interact and be compatible with one another.
  • It necessitates the ability to adjust individual plans to fit within the overall coordinated effort.

Where it’s relevant:

• Multi-Agent Systems:
  • In artificial intelligence, particularly in multi-agent systems, coordinated plan interaction is crucial. Robots or software agents need to coordinate their actions to perform complex tasks.
• Organizational Management:
  • In business and project management, it’s essential for different departments or teams to coordinate their plans to achieve organizational goals.
• Conflict Resolution:
  • In peace processes and conflict resolution, coordinated intervention plans are vital. Different organizations and actors must align their efforts to maximize their impact.
• Emergency Response:
  • In situations of natural disasters, or other emergencies, various agencies must have coordinated plans to provide effective aid.

Essentially, “Coordinated Plan Interaction” is about:

• Ensuring that everyone is working towards the same objectives.
• Avoiding conflicting actions.
• Optimizing the use of resources.
• Improving overall efficiency and effectiveness.

I hope this helps.

What is Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

“Coordinated Plan Interaction” essentially describes the process of multiple entities aligning their individual plans to achieve a shared objective. This concept is relevant in various fields, and here’s a breakdown of its core aspects:

Key Elements:

• Alignment:
  • It involves ensuring that the plans of different actors are compatible and work together, rather than conflicting.
• Communication:
  • Effective communication is vital for sharing information, understanding each other’s plans, and resolving potential conflicts.
• Collaboration:
  • It often requires collaboration, where entities actively work together to modify their plans and actions to achieve the common goal.
• Interdependence:
  • It acknowledges that the success of one entity’s plan may depend on the actions of others.

Applications:

• Multi-Agent Systems (AI):
  • In artificial intelligence, it’s crucial for robots or software agents to coordinate their plans to perform complex tasks.
• Organizational Management:
  • Businesses and organizations rely on coordinated plan interaction to ensure that different departments and teams work together effectively.
• Emergency Response:
  • During emergencies, various agencies must coordinate their plans to provide timely and effective assistance.
• Conflict Resolution:
  • In peace processes, coordinated intervention plans are essential for different actors to work towards a common goal.

In essence, Coordinated Plan Interaction is about:

• Maximizing efficiency by avoiding duplication of effort.
• Minimizing conflicts and ensuring that actions are aligned.
• Achieving complex goals that would be impossible for individual entities to accomplish alone.

I hope this explanation is helpful.

Who is required Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

Coordinated Plan Interaction is essential in any scenario where multiple entities need to work together to achieve a common goal. This means it’s relevant across a wide range of fields. Here are some key areas and the types of entities involved:

1. Healthcare:

• Who:
  • Doctors, nurses, specialists, therapists, pharmacists, and other healthcare providers.
  • Patients and their families.
  • Hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities.
  • Insurance companies.
• Why:
  • To ensure patients receive comprehensive and efficient care.
  • To avoid duplicate tests and treatments.
  • To improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

2. Emergency Response:

• Who:
  • Firefighters, police officers, paramedics, and other first responders.
  • Hospitals and emergency medical services.
  • Government agencies and disaster relief organizations.
• Why:
  • To provide timely and effective assistance during emergencies.
  • To coordinate resources and minimize damage.
  • To save lives and protect property.

3. Business and Project Management:

• Who:
  • Different departments and teams within an organization.
  • Project managers and team members.
  • Suppliers, vendors, and partners.
• Why:
  • To achieve organizational goals and project objectives.
  • To improve efficiency and productivity.
  • To avoid conflicts and delays.

4. Technology and Artificial Intelligence:

• Who:
  • Robots and autonomous systems.
  • Software agents in multi-agent systems.
  • Developers and programmers.
• Why:
  • To enable complex tasks to be performed by multiple agents.
  • To ensure that systems work together effectively.
  • To create more efficient and intelligent systems.

5. Government and Public Policy:

• Who:
  • Different government agencies and departments.
  • International organizations and NGOs.
  • Community groups and stakeholders.
• Why:
  • To implement effective public policies.
  • To address complex social and environmental issues.
  • To coordinate international efforts.

In essence, anyone involved in a situation where collaboration and teamwork are required needs coordinated plan interaction.

When is required Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

Coordinated Plan Interaction becomes essential in a multitude of situations, particularly when:

• Complex Tasks Are Involved:
  • When a single entity cannot achieve a goal independently, coordination is vital. This is seen in large-scale projects, complex manufacturing, and intricate service delivery.
• Resource Optimization Is Crucial:
  • To avoid duplication of effort and maximize efficiency, coordinated planning is necessary. This applies to resource allocation in emergencies, budget management in organizations, and supply chain logistics.
• Interdependencies Exist:
  • When the actions of one entity affect the outcomes of others, coordination is indispensable. This is evident in:
    • Healthcare, where multiple specialists contribute to patient care.
    • Construction projects, where various trades must work in sequence.
    • Software development, where different modules must integrate seamlessly.
• Emergencies Arise:
  • In crisis situations like natural disasters or public health emergencies, coordinated responses are critical. This ensures efficient allocation of aid, effective communication, and minimized damage.
• Conflicts Need Resolution:
  • When different parties have conflicting interests, coordinated planning can help find mutually acceptable solutions. This is essential in:
    • International relations.
    • Labor negotiations.
    • Community development.
• When there are multiple services involved with one person:
  • When a person is recieving services from multiple agencies, like in social work, or when a person has multiple insurance policies.

In summary, Coordinated Plan Interaction is necessary whenever there is a need for multiple actors to work together effectively to achieve a common goal, particularly in situations that are complex, interdependent, or time-sensitive.

COURTESY : Plan Partners

Where is required Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

Coordinated Plan Interaction is needed in a wide variety of settings, any place where multiple actors are working towards related goals. Here are some key areas where it is particularly important:

1. Within Organizations:

• Businesses:
  • Across departments (sales, marketing, production) to ensure alignment.
  • In project management, where different teams must coordinate their tasks.
  • In supply chain management, to coordinate the flow of goods and information.
• Government Agencies:
  • Between different departments to implement policies effectively.
  • In interagency collaborations for addressing complex issues.
• Hospitals and Healthcare Settings:
  • Between doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals to provide comprehensive patient care.
  • During emergency situations, to coordinate medical responses.

2. In Public and Social Sectors:

• Emergency Response Situations:
  • During natural disasters, to coordinate the efforts of first responders, aid organizations, and government agencies.
• Community Development Projects:
  • When multiple organizations and community groups are working together to improve local conditions.
• International Relations:
  • In diplomatic efforts, to coordinate actions between nations.
  • In international aid programs, to ensure efficient distribution of resources.

3. In Technological Environments:

• Multi-Agent Systems:
  • In robotics and artificial intelligence, to enable multiple agents to work together effectively.
• Software Development:
  • When teams are working on different parts of a software project, to ensure compatibility.
• Network Management:
  • When multiple systems need to work together to maintain a stable network.

Key Takeaways:

• Essentially, any situation that involves collaboration and interdependence requires coordinated plan interaction.
• The need for coordination increases with the complexity of the task and the number of entities involved.
• It is very important when dealing with any type of case management of humans.

I hope this helps!

How is required Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

Achieving effective Coordinated Plan Interaction requires a multifaceted approach. Here’s a breakdown of the key elements involved:

1. Clear Communication:

• Establish Communication Channels:
  • Define how information will be shared (e.g., meetings, reports, digital platforms).
  • Ensure all participants have access to these channels.
• Promote Open Dialogue:
  • Encourage active listening and the sharing of ideas.
  • Create a safe space for raising concerns and resolving conflicts.
• Provide Regular Updates:
  • Keep everyone informed of progress, changes, and potential challenges.

2. Defined Roles and Responsibilities:

• Clarify Expectations:
  • Clearly outline each entity’s role in the coordinated plan.
  • Avoid overlapping responsibilities to prevent confusion.
• Establish Accountability:
  • Ensure each entity understands its obligations and is held accountable for its actions.

3. Shared Understanding and Goals:

• Develop a Common Vision:
  • Ensure all participants understand and agree on the overall objective.
  • Create a shared sense of purpose.
• Establish Clear Goals:
  • Define specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals.
  • Break down large goals into smaller, manageable tasks.

4. Planning and Strategy:

• Develop a Comprehensive Plan:
  • Outline the steps involved in achieving the goals.
  • Anticipate potential challenges and develop contingency plans.
• Establish Timelines and Milestones:
  • Set realistic deadlines for each task.
  • Monitor progress and make adjustments as needed.

5. Utilizing Technology:

• Collaboration Tools:
  • Use software platforms to facilitate communication, document sharing, and project management.
• Data Sharing:
  • Implement systems for securely sharing relevant data.

6. Flexibility and Adaptability:

• Embrace Change:
  • Be prepared to adjust plans in response to changing circumstances.
  • Encourage a culture of continuous improvement.
• Regular Evaluation:
  • Consistently check the plan, and the progress of the plan.

In essence, effective Coordinated Plan Interaction relies on:

• Building trust and fostering collaboration.
• Establishing clear processes and procedures.
• Maintaining open and transparent communication.

Case study is Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

Yes, case studies are excellent tools for illustrating how Coordinated Plan Interaction works in real-world scenarios. Here’s how case studies relate to this concept, and some examples:

How Case Studies Demonstrate Coordinated Plan Interaction:

• Real-World Context:
  • Case studies provide detailed accounts of actual situations, showing how different entities interacted and coordinated their plans to achieve specific outcomes.
• Highlighting Interdependencies:
  • They often reveal the complex relationships between various actors and how their actions affected each other.
• Analyzing Successes and Failures:
  • Case studies can illustrate both successful and unsuccessful attempts at coordination, providing valuable lessons learned.
• Illustrating the Importance of Communication:
  • They show how vital effective communication is to the success of coordinated efforts.

Examples of Case Studies:

• Emergency Response:
  • Case studies of disaster relief efforts (e.g., responses to hurricanes, earthquakes) often highlight the critical role of coordinated plan interaction between first responders, government agencies, and aid organizations. These studies will often show where communications broke down, and where good communications helped save lives.
  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) provides many case studies on their website.
• Healthcare:
  • Case studies in healthcare often focus on the coordination of care for patients with complex medical conditions. These studies may examine how doctors, nurses, therapists, and social workers collaborate to provide comprehensive care.
  • One example from the search results, is the study of “A Multi-site Case Study of Care Coordination Between Primary Care and Specialty Care”. This shows how differing levels of communication between different sections of the medical field, impacted patient care.
• Project Management:
  • Case studies of large-scale construction or infrastructure projects can illustrate how project managers coordinate the activities of multiple contractors, suppliers, and stakeholders.
• Social Services:
  • Case studies involving social work often show how many different agencies need to work together to help a person or family. This could involve, housing, health care, and other social programs.

In essence, case studies provide valuable insights into the practical application of Coordinated Plan Interaction, demonstrating its importance in achieving successful outcomes in various fields.

COURTESY : Aaron Becker

White paper on Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

It’s important to understand that a “white paper” on “Coordinated Plan Interaction” as a single, universally defined concept might not exist. However, the principles of coordinated planning are deeply embedded in many fields, and therefore, you’ll find white papers addressing it within specific contexts. Here’s a breakdown of how to find relevant information and what areas commonly feature these concepts:

Where to Find Relevant Information:

• Government and Policy:
  • Government agencies and international organizations often publish white papers on coordinated efforts in areas like:
    • Emergency response: FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and similar organizations provide documentation on coordinated disaster relief.
    • Cybersecurity: Documents outlining coordinated responses to cyber threats, such as those from the European Commission.
    • Public health: Organizations like the WHO (World Health Organization) publish reports on coordinated global health initiatives.
• Technology and Industry:
  • Technology companies and industry consortiums release white papers on coordinated systems and interoperability:
    • Multi-agent systems: Research papers and industry publications explore coordination in robotics and AI.
    • Network security: Companies like Lockheed Martin publish white papers on coordinated defense strategies.
    • Cloud computing platforms like AWS, have many white papers relating to how their systems can be used to coordinate data, and actions.
• Healthcare:
  • Healthcare organizations and research institutions publish studies and reports on coordinated care models.

Key Themes in Relevant White Papers:

• Interoperability:
  • Many white papers focus on how different systems or organizations can work together seamlessly.
• Information Sharing:
  • Effective communication and data exchange are crucial for coordinated planning.
• Crisis Management:
  • Coordinated responses to emergencies require clear protocols and well-defined roles.
• Strategic Alignment:
  • Organizations need to align their goals and actions to achieve shared objectives.

Example areas from the search results:

• Cybersecurity:
  • The European Commission’s cybersecurity blueprint emphasizes the need for coordinated responses to cyber crises. This is a very clear example of a coordinated plan interaction, on a very large scale.
• Government Implementation:
  • The European comission also publishes documents on how to impliment and simplify policies, and this requires coordinated work between member states.

In conclusion, while a single “Coordinated Plan Interaction” white paper might be elusive, the concept is fundamental to many domains. By exploring publications from relevant organizations, you can find valuable insights into its practical application.

Industrial application of Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

Coordinated Plan Interaction plays a vital role in modern industrial applications, where efficiency, precision, and collaboration are paramount. Here are some key industrial applications:

1. Manufacturing and Production:

• Supply Chain Management:
  • Coordinating the flow of materials, components, and finished products between suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors. This involves real-time data sharing and synchronized planning.
• Robotics and Automation:
  • In automated factories, multiple robots and machines need to coordinate their actions to perform complex tasks. This requires sophisticated control systems and communication protocols.
• Production Scheduling:
  • Coordinating production schedules across different departments and facilities to optimize resource utilization and meet customer demand.

2. Construction and Engineering:

• Building Information Modeling (BIM):
  • BIM facilitates coordinated plan interaction by enabling architects, engineers, and contractors to collaborate on a shared 3D model. This helps to identify and resolve potential conflicts before construction begins.
• Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects:
  • Coordinating the activities of multiple contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers on complex infrastructure projects such as bridges, tunnels, and highways.

3. Energy and Utilities:

• Smart Grids:
  • Coordinating the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity across a smart grid involves real-time data analysis and coordinated control of various devices.
• Oil and Gas Production:
  • Coordinating the activities of drilling rigs, pipelines, and refineries to optimize production and ensure safety.

4. Logistics and Transportation:

• Fleet Management:
  • Coordinating the movements of a fleet of vehicles to optimize delivery routes and reduce fuel consumption.
• Air Traffic Control:
  • Coordinating the movements of aircraft to ensure safe and efficient air travel.

Key Aspects of Industrial Coordinated Plan Interaction:

• Real-time Data Sharing:
  • Industrial applications often rely on real-time data sharing to enable coordinated decision-making.
• Automation and Control Systems:
  • Automated control systems play a crucial role in coordinating the actions of machines and devices.
• Communication Networks:
  • Reliable communication networks are essential for transmitting data and coordinating actions across different locations.

In essence, Coordinated Plan Interaction is a critical component of modern industrial operations, enabling companies to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance safety.

Research and development of Coordinated Plan Interaction ?

Research and development (R&D) in Coordinated Plan Interaction spans a wide range of disciplines, driven by the increasing need for effective collaboration in complex systems. Here’s a look at key areas of R&D:

1. Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Agent Systems:

• Focus:
  • Developing algorithms and protocols that enable autonomous agents (robots, software programs) to coordinate their actions.
  • Researching methods for agents to negotiate, communicate, and form collaborative plans.
  • Creating AI systems that can adapt to changing environments and unexpected events.
• Key areas:
  • Distributed AI.
  • Swarm intelligence.
  • Reinforcement learning for multi-agent coordination.

2. Information and Communication Technologies (ICT):

• Focus:
  • Designing communication networks and platforms that facilitate seamless information sharing and collaboration.
  • Developing tools for real-time data analysis and visualization to support coordinated decision-making.
  • Enhancing cybersecurity to protect coordinated systems from threats.
• Key areas:
  • Internet of Things (IoT) for coordinated sensor networks.
  • Cloud computing and distributed databases.
  • Secure communication protocols.

3. Social Sciences and Organizational Behavior:

• Focus:
  • Studying how human organizations coordinate their activities in various contexts (e.g., emergency response, project management).
  • Developing frameworks and models for effective teamwork and collaboration.
  • Analyzing the impact of communication and leadership on coordinated outcomes.
• Key areas:
  • Team dynamics and performance.
  • Organizational communication.
  • Crisis management and disaster response.

4. Systems Engineering and Control Theory:

• Focus:
  • Designing and analyzing complex systems that require coordinated control of multiple components.
  • Developing methods for optimizing system performance and ensuring stability.
  • Researching techniques for fault detection and recovery in coordinated systems.
• Key areas:
  • Distributed control systems.
  • Networked control systems.
  • Cyber-physical systems.

Key Trends in R&D:

• Emphasis on autonomy and adaptability: Coordinated systems are becoming increasingly autonomous, capable of adapting to dynamic environments.
• Integration of AI and machine learning: AI is playing a growing role in enabling intelligent coordination.
• Focus on resilience and security: Coordinated systems must be resilient to failures and secure from cyberattacks.
• Interdisciplinary collaboration: Effective R&D in this area requires collaboration across multiple disciplines.

In essence, R&D in Coordinated Plan Interaction is driven by the need to create more intelligent, efficient, and resilient systems that can operate effectively in complex and dynamic environments.

COURTESY : Ashish Chauhan

Footnotes

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k} West, Richard; Turner, Lynn H (2007). Introducing Communication Theory Analysis and Application (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-07-313561-8.
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Miller, Ashley; Davidson, Sarah (April 2019). “Co-ordinating meaning within a gender identity development service: What can the theory of the co-ordinated management of meaning offer clinicians working with young people, and their families, exploring their gender identities”. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 24 (2): 322–337. doi:10.1177/1359104519838313. ISSN 1359-1045. PMID 30968721. S2CID 106409758.
3. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pearce, W. Barnett; Cronen, Vernon E.; Johnson, Kenneth; Jones, Greg; Raymond, Robert (1980–1984). “The structure of communication rules and the form of conversation: An experimental simulation”. Western Journal of Speech Communication. 44 (1): 20–34. doi:10.1080/10570318009373983. ISSN 0193-6700.
4. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Thompson, Carol; Kleine, Michael (2016-12-01). “Using literature to explore interpersonal theory: Representation of rhetorical objectification and oppression”. Journal of Pedagogy. 7 (2): 97–115. doi:10.1515/jped-2016-0013. ISSN 1338-2144.
5. ^ Ronald C, Arnett (2013). “Philosophy Of Communication As Carrier Of Meaning: Adieu To W. Barnett Pearce”. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication. 14 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1080/17459435.2013.834957. S2CID 143298962.
6. ^ Pearce 2004.
7. ^ Cronen 2001.
8. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j} Rose, Randall A. (July 2006). “A Proposal for Integrating Structuration Theory With Coordinated Management of Meaning Theory”. Communication Studies. 57 (2): 173–196. doi:10.1080/10510970600666867. ISSN 1051-0974. S2CID 144388154.
9. ^ Pearce 2002.
10. ^ Holmgren 2004, p. 91.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b Pearce Associates 1999, p.12.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jorgensen, Erling O. (2000). “Relational transformation in mediation: Following constitutive and regulative rules”. Mediation Quarterly. 17 (3): 295–312. doi:10.1002/crq.3900170307. ISSN 1932-7544.
13. ^ Holmgren 2004, p.92.
14. ^ Gerry, Phillipsen (1995). Watershed research traditions in human communication theory.
15. ^ Assessing belief in coordinating meaning in romantic relationships.
16. ^ Schorlemmer, Marco; Kalfoglou, Yannis (2005-01-01). “Progressive ontology alignment for meaning coordination”. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS ’05. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 737–744. doi:10.1145/1082473.1082586. ISBN 978-1-59593-093-4. S2CID 6778373.
17. ^ Jaatinen, Miia (2008-05-09). “Common understanding as a basis for coordination”. Corporate Communications. 13 (2): 147–167. doi:10.1108/13563280810869587. ISSN 1356-3289. S2CID 24602350.
18. ^ Pearce 2005, p.50.
19. ^ Paul, Jim; Strbiak, Christy A. (1997-04-01). “The Ethics of Strategic Ambiguity”. The Journal of Business Communication. 34 (2): 149–159. doi:10.1177/002194369703400202. ISSN 0021-9436. S2CID 145717663.
20. ^ Cushman, Donald (1972). “An approach to communication theory: Toward consensus on rules”. Journal of Communication. 22 (3): 217–238. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1972.tb00149.x.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b Gerald W, Driskill (1995). “Managing Cultural Differences: A Rules Analysis In A Bicultural Organization”. Howard Journal of Communications. 5 (4): 353–379. doi:10.1080/10646179509361676 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Usua, Ntiense (2016-07-25), “Theories and Principles of Intercultural Communication in a Globalizing World”, Intercultural Communication and Public Policy, M and J Grand Orbit Communications, pp. 19–50, doi:10.2307/j.ctvh8qzvr.8, ISBN 9789785431148
23. ^ Cuffari, Elena C. (2014-01-01). “Keep meaning in conversational coordination”. Frontiers in Psychology. 5: 1397. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01397. PMC 4253663. PMID 25520693.
24. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j} Parker, Polly; Wasserman, Ilene; Kram, Kathy E.; Hall, Douglas T. (2015-02-25). “A Relational Communication Approach to Peer Coaching”. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 51 (2): 231–252. doi:10.1177/0021886315573270. ISSN 0021-8863. S2CID 146178294.
25. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Miller, Katherine (2004-06-30). Communication Theories, Perspectives, Processes, and contexts. McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated. p. 150. ISBN 978-0-07-293794-7.
26. ^ Eerika, Hedman; Gesch-Karamanlidis, Eleni (2015). “Facilitating Conversations That Matter Using Coordinated Management Of Meaning Theory”. OD Practitioner. 47 (2) – via 1. Business Source Complete.
27. ^ HFCL Tutorial 2008, p.2.
28. ^ Pearce 1994, p.104.
29. ^ Kim, Wolfson; Pearce, W. Barnett (1983). “A Cross-Cultural Comparison Of The Implications Of Self-Disclosure On Conversational Logics”. Communication Quarterly. 31 (3): 249–256. doi:10.1080/01463378309369511 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.
30. ^ Veron E, Cronen; Pearce, W. Barnett; Harris, Linda M (1979). “The Logic Of The Coordinated Management Of Meaning: A Rules-Based Approach To The First Course In Interpersonal Communication”. Communication Education. 28 (1): 22–38. doi:10.1080/03634527909378327 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.
31. ^ Lowry, Linda L. and Cartier, Elizabeth A., “Using the CMM eoretical Lens to Deconstruct Problematic Discourse Regarding Quality and Rigor in Tourism Research: Can Transparency Bridge the Metatheoretical Divide?” (2016). Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally. 6.
32. ^ Jump up to:^a b Barge 2004.
33. ^ Pearce 2005, p.39.
34. ^ Adams, et al. 2004.
35. ^ Sundarajan and Spano 2004.
36. ^ Pearce and Pearce 2000.
37. ^ Orbe, Mark P.; Camara, Sakile K. (2010-05-01). “Defining discrimination across cultural groups: Exploring the [un-]coordinated management of meaning”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 34 (3): 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.02.004.
38. ^ Buttle, Francis A. (1994-08-01). “The Co-ordinated Management of Meaning: A Case Exemplar of a New Consumer Research Technologynull”. European Journal of Marketing. 28 (8/9): 76–99. doi:10.1108/03090569410067640. ISSN 0309-0566.
39. ^ Pearce 2005, p.38-48.
40. ^ Littlejohn, Stephen W., and Karen A. Foss. “Chapter 6: The Conversation.” Theories of Human Communication. Long Grove, IL: Waveland, 2017. N. pag. Print.
41. ^ Pearce 2005, p.43.
42. ^ Montgomery, Edith (2004-09-01). “Tortured Families: A Coordinated Management of Meaning Analysis”. Family Process. 43 (3): 349–371. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00027.x. ISSN 1545-5300. PMID 15386959.
43. ^ Kearney 2004, p.9.
44. ^ Craig 1997.
45. ^ Pearce Associates 1999, p.37-38.
46. ^ Mozhdeh B, Truss (2005). “Food, Culture, And Family: Exploring The Coordinated Management Of Meaning Regarding Childhood Obesity”. Health Communication. 18 (2): 155–175. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1802_4. PMID 16083409. S2CID 46722594 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.
47. ^ Jensen, Moore; Laters, Amy (2008). “Coordinated Management Of Meaning In Chat Rooms”. International Communication Association: 1–46 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.
48. ^ Mark P, Orbe; Camara, Skile K (2012). “Defining Discrimination Across Cultural Groups: Exploring The [Un-]Coordinated Management Of Meaning”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 34 (3): 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.02.004 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.
49. ^ “Coordinated Management of Meaning”, Encyclopedia of Communication Theory, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2009, pp. 201–203, doi:10.4135/9781412959384.n76, ISBN 9781412959377, retrieved 2023-11-06
50. ^ Moore 2001, p.4-8.
51. ^ Danielle, Wiese; Farrugia, Rebekah (2009). “Coordinating Communication On Facebook: An Analysis Of Meaning Development Through Close Relationships”. Conference Papers — National Communication Association – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.
52. ^ Brenders, David A. (1987). “Fallacies in the coordinated management of meaning: A philosophy of language critique of the hierarchical organization of coherent conversation and related theory”. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 73 (3): 329–348. doi:10.1080/00335638709383812.
53. ^ Rose, Randall A. (2006-07-01). “A Proposal for Integrating Structuration Theory With Coordinated Management of Meaning Theory”. Communication Studies. 57 (2): 173–196. doi:10.1080/10510970600666867. ISSN 1051-0974. S2CID 144388154.
54. ^ Jump up to:^a b Chen, Victoria (2004). “The possibility of critical dialogue in the theory of CMM”. Human Systems, LFTRC & KCC. 15: 179–192 – via JSTOR.
55. ^ “Pearce Associates”.
56. ^ Randall, Rose (2006). “A Proposal For Integrating Structuration Theory With Coordinated Management Of Meaning Theory”. Communication Studies. 57 (2): 173–196. doi:10.1080/10510970600666867. S2CID 144388154 – via Communication & Mass Media Complete.