Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

It appears you’re interested in the intersection of design, brain science, and recovery. This area encompasses several related concepts, including:

• Neuroarchitecture/Environmental Psychology:
  • This field explores how the design of our built environments impacts our brains and mental well-being. It investigates how factors like lighting, noise, spatial layout, and aesthetics can influence stress levels, cognitive function, and emotional states.
  • “Recuperating Design Variety” could relate to designing spaces that promote recovery from stress or cognitive fatigue, by providing varied and restorative sensory experiences.
• Neuroplasticity and Recovery:
  • Brain science demonstrates that the brain is capable of changing and adapting throughout life (neuroplasticity).
  • Design can play a role in facilitating this process, particularly in recovery from brain injuries or neurological conditions. For example, designing environments that stimulate specific cognitive functions can aid in rehabilitation.
• Brain Preservation:
  • This is a field of study that researches how to preserve the brain in a way that the information it holds can be read in the future.
  • This is very different than designing spaces for people to recover in.
• Postoperative Neurocognitive Dysfunction (POCD):
  • This refers to cognitive decline that can occur after surgery and anesthesia.
  • Research is ongoing to understand the causes and develop strategies for prevention and recovery.

Here’s a breakdown of key takeaways from the search results:

• The Built Environment’s Impact:
  • The design of our surroundings significantly affects our physiological and psychological well-being.
  • Stress-inducing environments can negatively impact brain health.
  • Designing spaces that promote mental well-being is crucial.
• Brain Injury and Recovery:
  • Brain injuries can lead to various cognitive and neurological impairments.
  • Rehabilitation efforts focus on promoting neuroplasticity and restoring function.
  • Research is ongoing to improve diagnostic tools and develop new therapies.
• Advances in Brain Therapies:
  • There is on going research into ways to deliver therapies into the brain, through things like Lipid nanoparticle systems, to deliver mRNA. This could open up many new ways to treat brain diseases.

In essence, “recuperating design variety” could be interpreted as a call for designing environments that are:

• Restorative: Reducing stress and promoting relaxation.
• Stimulating: Engaging cognitive functions and promoting neuroplasticity.
• Varied: Providing diverse sensory experiences to prevent cognitive fatigue.

I hope this information is helpful.

What is Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

It’s important to clarify that “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” isn’t a formally established, singular field of study with that exact name. However, it represents a concept that draws from several interconnected disciplines. Here’s how we can break it down:

• “Recuperating”:
  • This implies recovery, restoration, and healing. In the context of brain science, it refers to the process of recovering from cognitive fatigue, stress, or neurological impairments.
• “Design Variety”:
  • This highlights the importance of diverse sensory experiences and environmental stimuli. It suggests that a variety of design elements can contribute to the recuperative process.
• “Brain Science”:
  • This encompasses the study of the brain and nervous system, including how they function and how they are affected by the environment.

Therefore, “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” can be understood as the exploration of how varied design elements can be used to promote brain recovery and well-being. This involves:

• Neuroarchitecture and Environmental Psychology:
  • These fields investigate how the built environment influences brain function and mental health. They examine how factors like light, sound, space, and aesthetics can affect stress levels, cognitive performance, and emotional states.
• Neuroplasticity:
  • This is the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. Design can play a role in stimulating neuroplasticity and promoting recovery from brain injuries or neurological conditions.
• Stress Reduction:
  • Design can be used to create calming and restorative environments that reduce stress and promote relaxation, which is essential for brain health.

In essence, the concept emphasizes:

• Creating environments that are not only functional but also supportive of brain health and recovery.
• Recognizing the importance of sensory diversity in promoting cognitive well-being.
• Applying principles of brain science to design spaces that foster healing and restoration.

I hope this explanation helps.

Who is required Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

The principles of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” are relevant to a broad spectrum of individuals and professionals. Here’s a breakdown of who benefits:

1. Individuals:

• People recovering from neurological conditions:
  • This includes those who have experienced traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), strokes, or other neurological disorders. Varied sensory stimulation can aid in their rehabilitation.
• Individuals experiencing high levels of stress:
  • In today’s fast-paced world, many people suffer from chronic stress. Design that promotes relaxation and reduces sensory overload can be highly beneficial.
• People with cognitive impairments:
  • Those with conditions like dementia or Alzheimer’s disease can benefit from environments that provide appropriate sensory stimulation and support cognitive function.
• Anyone seeking to improve their overall well-being:
  • The principles of neuroarchitecture can be applied to create homes and workplaces that promote mental and emotional health for everyone.

2. Professionals:

• Architects and interior designers:
  • Understanding the impact of design on the brain allows them to create spaces that are not only aesthetically pleasing but also conducive to well-being.
• Healthcare professionals:
  • Doctors, therapists, and rehabilitation specialists can use design principles to create healing environments that support patient recovery.
• Urban planners:
  • Designing cities with access to green spaces and varied sensory experiences can improve the mental health of entire communities.
• Educators:
  • Designing classroom spaces that are optimal for learning and that reduce stress for students.
• Researchers:
  • Those who are studying the brain, and how environments effect the brain.

In essence, anyone who is concerned with the relationship between the environment and human well-being can benefit from understanding and applying the principles of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science.”

When is required Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

The need for “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” arises in a multitude of situations, reflecting the increasing recognition of the profound connection between our environment and our cognitive well-being. Here’s a breakdown of key scenarios:

1. Healthcare Settings:

• Hospitals and Rehabilitation Centers:
  • Post-surgery recovery: To minimize postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (POCD).
  • Stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation: To stimulate neuroplasticity and aid in recovery.
  • Mental health facilities: To create calming and supportive environments.
  • Dementia care: To provide sensory stimulation and reduce agitation.
• Elderly Care Facilities:
  • To combat cognitive decline and promote well-being in older adults.

2. Workplaces:

• Offices:
  • To reduce stress and improve cognitive performance.
  • To prevent burnout and promote employee well-being.
• High-Stress Environments:
  • Such as air traffic control centers or emergency response facilities, where cognitive clarity is crucial.

3. Educational Settings:

• Schools and Universities:
  • To create optimal learning environments that reduce stress and enhance focus.
  • To support students with learning disabilities.

4. Urban Planning:

• City Design:
  • To create cities that promote mental health and well-being.
  • To provide access to green spaces and restorative environments.

5. Residential Spaces:

• Homes:
  • To create calming and restorative environments that reduce stress and promote relaxation.
  • Especially important in homes where people are recovering from illness or injury.

In essence, the need for these design principles is relevant:

• Whenever cognitive function is compromised or at risk.
• Whenever stress levels are high.
• Whenever the goal is to promote healing and well-being.
• Basically, in almost all modern day situations.

As our understanding of the brain and its interaction with the environment deepens, the importance of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” will only continue to grow.

COURTESY : Brainywood

Where is required Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

The principles of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” are applicable across a wide range of environments, wherever human well-being and cognitive function are a priority. Here’s a breakdown of key locations:

1. Healthcare Environments:

• Hospitals:
  • Patient rooms, waiting areas, and rehabilitation centers should be designed to reduce stress and promote healing.
  • Specifically, in areas where patients are recovering from neurological trauma.
• Rehabilitation Centers:
  • These spaces require designs that stimulate neuroplasticity and support cognitive and physical recovery.
• Mental Health Facilities:
  • Calming and supportive environments are crucial for individuals with mental health conditions.
• Elderly Care Facilities:
  • Designs that promote cognitive stimulation and reduce sensory overload are essential for the well-being of older adults.

2. Workplaces:

• Offices:
  • Creating workspaces that reduce stress, enhance focus, and promote creativity is vital for employee productivity and well-being.
• High-Stress Occupations:
  • Environments for air traffic controllers, emergency responders, and other high-stress professions need to be designed to minimize cognitive fatigue.

3. Educational Institutions:

• Schools and Universities:
  • Classrooms and learning spaces should be designed to optimize learning and reduce distractions.

4. Urban Environments:

• Cities:
  • Urban planning should prioritize access to green spaces, natural light, and varied sensory experiences to promote the mental health of residents.
• Public Spaces:
  • Parks, plazas, and other public areas should be designed to provide restorative and engaging experiences.

5. Residential Spaces:

• Homes:
  • Creating calming and restorative home environments is crucial for overall well-being.
  • Especially in homes where people are recovering from illnesses.

In essence, the need for these design principles exists in any environment where humans interact with their surroundings. The increasing understanding of neuroarchitecture means that these principles are becoming more and more relevant in the design of any space.

How is required Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

The implementation of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” involves a multifaceted approach, integrating principles from neuroscience, psychology, and design. Here’s a breakdown of how it’s required:

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

• Neuroscientists, psychologists, and designers:
  • These professionals must work together to translate scientific findings into practical design solutions.
  • This collaboration ensures that designs are grounded in evidence-based principles.
• Healthcare professionals and architects:
  • In healthcare settings, close collaboration between these professionals is essential to create healing environments.

2. Evidence-Based Design:

• Research and data collection:
  • Conducting research to understand how different design elements affect brain function and well-being.
  • Collecting data on the impact of design interventions in real-world settings.
• Application of scientific principles:
  • Using knowledge of neuroplasticity, sensory processing, and stress response to inform design decisions.

3. Key Design Considerations:

• Sensory Stimulation:
  • Providing a variety of sensory experiences, such as natural light, varied textures, and calming sounds.
  • Avoiding sensory overload, which can be detrimental to brain health.
• Spatial Layout:
  • Creating spaces that promote a sense of safety and security.
  • Designing layouts that facilitate wayfinding and reduce confusion.
• Biophilic Design:
  • Integrating natural elements, such as plants, water features, and natural materials, into the built environment.
  • Promoting access to green spaces and natural light.
• Personalization:
  • Recognizing that individual needs and preferences vary.
  • Designing flexible and adaptable spaces that can be personalized.
• Technology Integration:
  • Using technology to regulate environmental factors, such as lighting and sound.
  • Developing virtual reality and augmented reality tools for rehabilitation and stress reduction.

4. Implementation Across Environments:

• Healthcare:
  • Designing hospitals and rehabilitation centers that promote healing and reduce stress.
  • Creating dementia-friendly environments that support cognitive function.
• Workplaces:
  • Designing offices that enhance productivity and well-being.
  • Creating restorative spaces for breaks and relaxation.
• Education:
  • Designing classrooms that optimize learning and reduce distractions.
  • Creating sensory-friendly environments for students with special needs.
• Urban Planning:
  • Designing cities that promote mental health and well-being.
  • Creating accessible green spaces and pedestrian-friendly environments.

In essence, implementing “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” requires a holistic and interdisciplinary approach, integrating scientific knowledge with design expertise to create environments that support brain health and well-being.

Case study is Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

It’s important to understand that “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” is a concept that draws from various fields, so case studies will often highlight specific aspects of this broader idea. Here’s how we can approach case studies related to this concept:

Key Areas for Case Studies:

• Healthcare Design:
  • Hospitals and Rehabilitation Centers:
    • Case studies examining how the design of patient rooms, therapy spaces, and common areas impacts patient recovery. This includes studies on the effects of:
      • Natural light and views of nature.
      • Noise reduction strategies.
      • The use of calming colors and textures.
      • Wayfinding and spatial clarity.
    • For example, studies on how biophilic design (incorporating natural elements) in hospitals reduces patient stress and speeds up recovery.
  • Dementia Care Facilities:
    • Case studies focusing on how design can support cognitive function and reduce agitation in individuals with dementia. This includes studies on:
      • Sensory stimulation and orientation.
      • Creating safe and familiar environments.
      • Using color and lighting to improve mood and behavior.
• Workplace Design:
  • Case studies investigating how office design affects employee well-being, productivity, and stress levels. This includes studies on:
    • The impact of open-plan vs. closed offices.
    • The effects of access to natural light and green spaces.
    • The use of ergonomic furniture and technology.
    • studies on how break rooms designed to be relaxing effect productivity.
• Educational Design:
  • Case studies exploring how classroom design influences student learning and behavior. This includes studies on:
    • The effects of classroom layout, lighting, and acoustics.
    • The use of flexible and adaptable learning spaces.
    • how sensory rooms effect students with sensory processing disorders.
• Urban Design:
  • Case studies examining how urban environments affect the mental health of residents. This includes studies on:
    • The impact of access to green spaces and parks.
    • The effects of noise and air pollution.
    • The design of pedestrian-friendly and walkable cities.

Where to Find Case Studies:

• Research Journals:
  • Journals focusing on neuroarchitecture, environmental psychology, and healthcare design.
• Design Publications:
  • Architectural and interior design magazines often feature case studies of innovative projects.
• Organizations:
  • Organizations like the Center for Health Design and the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture (ANFA) provide resources and case studies.

Essentially, when looking for case studies related to “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science,” focus on examples that demonstrate how design interventions are used to improve cognitive function, reduce stress, and promote well-being.

COURTESY : BLADE

White paper on Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

It’s important to recognize that the term “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” synthesizes concepts from several established fields. Therefore, finding a single, explicitly titled white paper might be difficult. However, you can find valuable information in white papers and publications related to these core areas:

Key Areas and Related White Papers:

• Neuroarchitecture:
  • This field explores how the built environment impacts the brain. Look for white papers from organizations like:
    • The Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture (ANFA): They often publish research and resources on the relationship between neuroscience and design.
    • The Center for Health Design: This organization focuses on evidence-based design for healthcare environments, which often incorporates neuroarchitectural principles.
  • These resources will often contain data driven information about how certain design choices effect human behavior, and brain function.
• Environmental Psychology:
  • This field examines the interactions between humans and their environments. Look for white papers and publications from universities and research institutions that focus on:
    • The impact of nature on mental health.
    • The effects of stress on cognitive function.
    • The role of sensory stimulation in well-being.
• Healthcare Design:
  • Hospitals and rehabilitation centers are increasingly incorporating brain science into their designs. Look for white papers from:
    • Healthcare design firms.
    • Medical research institutions.
    • Organizations that focus on patient-centered care.
• Brain Preservation:
  • While slightly different, it is important to understand the work being done in this field.
    • Look into work being done by organizations that are researching cryopreservation of brain tissue.
    • research papers on the preservation of neural tissue.

Where to Find White Papers:

• Professional Organizations: Websites of organizations like ANFA and the Center for Health Design often have downloadable resources.
• Research Databases: Databases like PubMed and Google Scholar can provide access to research papers and publications.
• University Websites: University research centers and departments related to neuroscience, psychology, and architecture may publish white papers.
• Design and Architecture Firms: Many firms that specialize in healthcare or workplace design publish white papers on their websites.

When searching, use keywords such as:

• “Neuroarchitecture”
• “Environmental psychology”
• “Evidence-based healthcare design”
• “Biophilic design”
• “Sensory design”
• “Cognitive rehabilitation design”

By exploring these resources, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of the principles and applications of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science.”

Industrial application of Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

The industrial application of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” translates to integrating neuroscience principles into various sectors to enhance human performance, well-being, and productivity. Here’s a breakdown of key industrial applications:

1. Workplace Design and Productivity:

• Office Environments:
  • Implementing biophilic design (natural light, plants, natural materials) to reduce stress and improve cognitive function.
  • Optimizing acoustics and lighting to minimize distractions and enhance focus.
  • Creating flexible workspaces that cater to different cognitive needs (e.g., quiet zones for focused work, collaborative spaces for brainstorming).
  • Using data from wearable sensors and EEG technology to monitor employee stress levels and adjust environmental factors accordingly.
• Manufacturing and Industrial Settings:
  • Designing control rooms and workstations to minimize cognitive fatigue and enhance situational awareness.
  • Implementing ergonomic designs that reduce physical and mental strain.
  • Optimizing lighting and noise levels to improve worker safety and productivity.

2. Healthcare and Rehabilitation:

• Hospital Design:
  • Creating patient rooms and waiting areas that reduce anxiety and promote healing.
  • Designing rehabilitation facilities that stimulate neuroplasticity and support cognitive recovery.
  • Using virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies for rehabilitation therapies.
• Elderly Care:
  • Designing environments that support cognitive function and reduce agitation in individuals with dementia.
  • Implementing sensory gardens and other therapeutic landscapes.

3. Technology and User Experience (UX):

• Product Design:
  • Designing user interfaces and products that are intuitive and easy to use, minimizing cognitive load.
  • Using neurofeedback and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to create personalized user experiences.
• Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR):
  • Developing VR and AR applications for therapeutic purposes, such as pain management and stress reduction.
  • Creating immersive training simulations that enhance cognitive skills and decision-making.

4. Urban Planning and Community Design:

• City Design:
  • Integrating green spaces and natural elements into urban environments to promote mental health and well-being.
  • Designing pedestrian-friendly streets and public spaces that encourage social interaction and physical activity.
  • Minimizing noise and air pollution to reduce stress and improve cognitive function.

Key Considerations:

• Data-Driven Design: Using data from neuroscience research and sensor technologies to inform design decisions.
• Personalization: Recognizing that individual needs and preferences vary, and designing flexible and adaptable environments.
• Ethical Considerations: Ensuring that the use of neuroscience technologies is ethical and respects individual privacy.

By integrating these principles, industries can create environments and products that enhance human well-being, productivity, and performance.

Research and development of Recuperating Design Variety Brain science ?

The research and development (R&D) of “Recuperating Design Variety Brain science” involves a dynamic interplay of several scientific disciplines. Here’s an overview of the key areas of R&D:

1. Neuroscience Research:

• Neuroplasticity Studies:
  • Research focuses on understanding how the brain adapts and rewires itself in response to environmental stimuli.
  • This includes investigating how different sensory experiences, cognitive exercises, and environmental designs can promote neuroplasticity.
• Sensory Processing:
  • Studies explore how the brain processes sensory information and how different sensory inputs affect cognitive function and emotional states.
  • This research informs the design of environments that optimize sensory stimulation and avoid sensory overload.
• Stress Response:
  • Research investigates the neural mechanisms of stress and how environmental factors contribute to stress levels.
  • This helps to develop design strategies that reduce stress and promote relaxation.
• Brain Imaging:
  • Techniques like fMRI, EEG, and MEG are used to study brain activity in response to different environmental stimuli.
  • This provides objective data on how design elements affect brain function.

2. Environmental Psychology:

• Human-Environment Interaction:
  • Studies examine how people perceive and interact with their surroundings.
  • This includes research on the psychological effects of natural environments, urban spaces, and interior designs.
• Biophilic Design:
  • Research investigates the benefits of incorporating natural elements into the built environment.
  • This includes studies on the effects of plants, natural light, and views of nature on mental and physical health.
• Cognitive Ergonomics:
  • Research focuses on designing environments that optimize cognitive performance and reduce cognitive fatigue.
  • This includes studies on workplace design, user interface design, and wayfinding.

3. Technological Advancements:

• Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR):
  • R&D is focused on developing VR and AR applications for therapeutic purposes, such as:
    • Cognitive rehabilitation.
    • Stress reduction.
    • Pain management.
  • These technologies allow for the creation of immersive and personalized environments.
• Sensor Technologies:
  • Wearable sensors and environmental sensors are used to collect data on physiological responses and environmental factors.
  • This data is used to inform design decisions and monitor the effectiveness of design interventions.
• Artificial Intelligence (AI):
  • AI is used to analyze large datasets of brain imaging and behavioral data.
  • AI is also used to develop intelligent environments that adapt to individual needs and preferences.
• Nanotechnology:
  • Nanotechnology is being used to develop new ways to deliver therapies into the brain.
  • This includes the development of nanoparticles that can cross the blood-brain barrier.

Key Research Directions:

• Developing evidence-based design guidelines for various environments, such as hospitals, workplaces, and schools.
• Investigating the long-term effects of environmental design on brain health and cognitive function.
• Creating personalized environments that adapt to individual needs and preferences.
• Integrating neuroscience and technology to develop innovative therapeutic interventions.

By advancing research in these areas, we can create environments that promote brain health, well-being, and optimal cognitive function.

COURTESY : Brainywood

References

1. ^ Krucoff, Max O.; Rahimpour, Shervin; Slutzky, Marc W.; Edgerton, V. Reggie; Turner, Dennis A. (2016-01-01). “Enhancing Nervous System Recovery through Neurobiologics, Neural Interface Training, and Neurorehabilitation”. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 10: 584. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00584. PMC 5186786. PMID 28082858.
2. ^ McDowell, FH (1 September 1994). “Neurorehabilitation”. Western Journal of Medicine. 161 (3): 323–327. ISSN 0093-0415. PMC 1011418. PMID 7975575.
3. ^ Ganguly, K; Byl, NN; Abrams, GM (September 2013). “Neurorehabilitation: motor recovery after stroke as an example”. Annals of Neurology. 74 (3): 373–81. doi:10.1002/ana.23994. PMID 25813243. S2CID 25030889.
4. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wilde, EA; Hunter, JV; Bigler, ED (2012). “Neuroimaging in neurorehabilitation”. NeuroRehabilitation. 31 (3): 223–6. doi:10.3233/NRE-2012-0792. PMID 23093451.
5. ^ Thompson, AJ (June 2005). “Neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: foundations, facts and fiction”. Current Opinion in Neurology. 18 (3): 267–71. doi:10.1097/01.wco.0000169743.37159.a0. PMID 15891410. S2CID 11935862.
6. ^ Rosti-Otajärvi, Eija M.; Hämäläinen, Päivi I. (2014-02-11). “Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis”. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2): CD009131. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009131.pub3. ISSN 1469-493X. PMC 10966661. PMID 24515630.
7. ^ Kitago, T; Krakauer, JW (2013). Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol. 110. pp. 93–103. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00008-3. ISBN 9780444529015. PMID 23312633.
8.  Krucoff, Max O.; Rahimpour, Shervin; Slutzky, Marc W.; Edgerton, V. Reggie; Turner, Dennis A. (2016-01-01). “Enhancing Nervous System Recovery through Neurobiologics, Neural Interface Training, and Neurorehabilitation”. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 10: 584. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00584. ISSN 1662-4548. PMC 5186786. PMID 28082858.
9. ^ “Implantable Device that Blocks Brain Signals Shows Promise in Obesity”. Medscape. Archived from the original on 2013-05-17. Retrieved 2013-08-25.
10. ^ Kiourti, Asimina; Nikita, Konstantina (2012). “Miniature scalp-implantable antennas for telemetry in the MICS and ISM bands: design, safety considerations and link budget analysis”. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 60 (8): 3568–75. Bibcode:2012ITAP…60.3568K. doi:10.1109/TAP.2012.2201078. S2CID 19236108.
11. ^ Mahoney, Patrick (June 21, 2007). “Wireless is getting under our skin”. Machine Design. Archived from the original on 2008-06-04. Retrieved 2011-08-14.
12. ^ Robitzski, Dan (8 April 2019). “This Neural Implant Accesses Your Brain Through the Jugular Vein”. Neoscope. Futurism. Archived from the original on 21 May 2020. Retrieved 24 November 2019.
13. ^ Schmidt, E.M.; Bak, M.J.; McIntosh, J.S. (1976). “Long-term chronic recording from cortical neurons”. Experimental Neurology. 52 (3): 496–506. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(76)90220-X. PMID 821770. S2CID 35740773.
14. ^ “Cyberkinetics Microelectrode Arrays” (PDF). Archived from the original on March 24, 2006. Retrieved October 25, 2006.
15. ^ Troyk, Philip; Bak, Martin; Berg, Joshua; Bradley, David; Cogan, Stuart; Erickson, Robert; Kufta, Conrad; McCreery, Douglas; Schmidt, Edward (2003). “A Model for Intracortical Visual Prosthesis Research”. Artificial Organs. 27 (11): 1005–15. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1594.2003.07308.x. PMID 14616519.
16. ^ Blake, David T.; Heiser, Marc A.; Caywood, Matthew; Merzenich, Michael M. (2006). “Experience-Dependent Adult Cortical Plasticity Requires Cognitive Association between Sensation and Reward”. Neuron. 52 (2): 371–81. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.009. PMC 2826987. PMID 17046698.
17. ^ “Neuroscientists Demonstrate New Way to Control Prosthetic Device with Brain Signals” (Press release). Caltech. July 8, 2004. Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
18. ^ “Laboratory for Integrative Neural Systems | RIKEN”. Riken.jp. Archived from the original on 2011-07-27. Retrieved 2011-08-14.
19. ^ “Blake Laboratory: Neural basis of behavior”. Mcg.edu. 2007-08-16. Archived from the original on 2010-05-28. Retrieved 2011-08-14.
20. ^ “Robert H. Wurtz, Ph.D. [NEI Laboratories]”. Nei.nih.gov. Archived from the original on 2011-07-27. Retrieved 2011-08-14.
21. ^ “Brain Research Institute”. Faculty.bri.ucla.edu. Archived from the original on 2011-10-07. Retrieved 2011-08-14.
22. ^ “Making the connection between a sound and a reward changes brain and behavior”. Physorg.com. 2006-10-19. Archived from the original on 2011-06-06. Retrieved 2008-04-25.
23. ^ Chapin, John K. “Robot arm controlled using command signals recorded directly from brain neurons”. SUNY Downstate Medical Center. Archived from the original on 2019-04-11. Retrieved 2008-04-25.
24. ^ Graham-Rowe, Duncan (2003-10-13). “Monkey’s brain signals control ‘third arm'”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 2008-04-30. Retrieved 2008-04-25.
25. ^ Mishra, Raja (2004-10-09). “Implant could free power of thought for paralyzed”. Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 2019-01-07. Retrieved 2008-04-25.
26. ^ Talmadoe, Eric (July 2001). “Japan’s latest innovation: a remote-control roach”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2018-11-22. Retrieved 2008-04-25.
27. ^ Warwick, K.; Gasson, M; Hutt, B; Goodhew, I; Kyberd, P; Andrews, B; Teddy, P; Shad, A (2003). “The Application of Implant Technology for Cybernetic Systems”. Archives of Neurology. 60 (10): 1369–73. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.10.1369. PMID 14568806.
28. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bolakhe, Saugat. “Lego Robot with an Organic ‘Brain’ Learns to Navigate a Maze”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
29. ^ “Genetically modified neurons could help us connect to implants”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
30. ^ Sample, Ian (3 December 2019). “Bionic neurons could enable implants to restore failing brain circuits”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
31. ^ Kaurav, Hemlata; Kapoor, Deepak N (December 2017). “Implantable systems for drug delivery to the brain”. Therapeutic Delivery. 8 (12): 1097–1107. doi:10.4155/tde-2017-0082. PMID 29125063.
32. ^ Neergaard, Lauran (24 January 2018). “Tiny implant opens way to deliver drugs deep into the brain”. CTVNews. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
33. ^ “Tiny electronic implants monitor brain injury, then melt away”. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. January 18, 2016. Archived from the original on October 16, 2017. Retrieved January 22, 2016.
34. ^ “Synchron Launches Trial of Stentrode device in Paralysis patients”. Medical Device Network. April 9, 2019. Archived from the original on July 26, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
35. ^ Lanese, Nicoletta (12 January 2023). “New ‘thought-controlled’ device reads brain activity through the jugular”. livescience.com. Archived from the original on 16 February 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
36. ^ Mitchell, Peter; Lee, Sarah C. M.; Yoo, Peter E.; Morokoff, Andrew; Sharma, Rahul P.; Williams, Daryl L.; MacIsaac, Christopher; Howard, Mark E.; Irving, Lou; Vrljic, Ivan; Williams, Cameron; Bush, Steven; Balabanski, Anna H.; Drummond, Katharine J.; Desmond, Patricia; Weber, Douglas; Denison, Timothy; Mathers, Susan; O’Brien, Terence J.; Mocco, J.; Grayden, David B.; Liebeskind, David S.; Opie, Nicholas L.; Oxley, Thomas J.; Campbell, Bruce C. V. (9 January 2023). “Assessment of Safety of a Fully Implanted Endovascular Brain-Computer Interface for Severe Paralysis in 4 Patients: The Stentrode With Thought-Controlled Digital Switch (SWITCH) Study”. JAMA Neurology. 80 (3): 270–278. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4847. ISSN 2168-6149. PMC 9857731. PMID 36622685. S2CID 255545643.
37. ^ Military seeks to develop ‘insect cyborgs’. Washington Times (13 March 2006). Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
38. ^ Military Plans Cyborg Sharks Archived 2008-07-08 at the Wayback Machine. LiveScience (7 March 2006). Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
39. ^ Lal A, Ewer J, Paul A, Bozkurt A, “Surgically Implanted Micro-platforms and Microsystems in Arthropods and Methods Based Thereon“, US Patent Application # US20100025527, Filed on 12/11/2007.
40. ^ Paul A., Bozkurt A., Ewer J., Blossey B., Lal A. (2006) Surgically Implanted Micro-Platforms in Manduca-Sexta, 2006 Solid State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, June 2006, pp. 209–11.
41. ^ Bozkurt A, Gilmour R, Sinha A, Stern D, Lal A (2009). Insect Machine Interface Based Neuro Cybernetics. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56:6, pp. 1727–33. doi:10.1109/TBME.2009.2015460
42. ^ Bozkurt A., Paul A., Pulla S., Ramkumar R., Blossey B., Ewer J., Gilmour R, Lal A. (2007) Microprobe Microsystem Platform Inserted During Early Metamorphosis to Actuate Insect Flight Muscle. 20th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2007), Kobe, Japan, January 2007, pp. 405–08. doi:10.1109/MEMSYS.2007.4432976
43. ^ Bozkurt A, Gilmour R, Stern D, Lal A. (2008) MEMS based Bioelectronic Neuromuscular Interfaces for Insect Cyborg Flight Control. 21st IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2008), Tucson, Arizona, January 2008, pp. 160–63. doi:10.1109/MEMSYS.2007.4432976
44. ^ Judy, Jack. “Hybrid Insect MEMS (HI-MEMS)”. DARPA Microsystems Technology Office. Archived from the original on 10 February 2011. Retrieved 2013-04-09.
45. ^ Anthes, E. (17 February 2013). “The race to create ‘insect cyborgs'”. The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
46. ^ Ornes, Stephen. “The Pentagon’s Beetle Borgs.” Discover 30.5 (2009): 14. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 1 Mar. 2010.
47. ^ Weinberger, Sharon (2009-09-24). “Video: Pentagon’s Cyborg Beetle Takes Flight”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on 2019-06-27. Retrieved 2019-05-05.
48. ^ Bozkurt A, Lal A, Gilmour R. (2009) Radio Control of Insects for Biobotic Domestication. 4th International Conference of the IEEE Neural Engineering (NER’09), Antalya, Turkey.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b Guizzo, Eric. “Moth Pupa + MEMS Chip = Remote Controlled Cyborg Insect.” Archived 2020-07-27 at the Wayback Machine Automan. IEEE Spectrum, 17 Feb 2009. Web. 1 Mar 2010.
50. ^ Judy, Jack. “Hybrid Insect MEMS (HI-MEMS)”. DARPA Microsystems Technology Office. Archived from the original on 10 February 2011. Retrieved 2013-04-09. The intimate control of insects with embedded microsystems will enable insect cyborgs, which could carry one or more sensors, such as a microphone or a gas sensor, to relay back information gathered from the target destination.
51. ^ “Minimally Invasive “Stentrode” Shows Potential as Neural Interface for Brain”. www.darpa.mil. DARPA. February 8, 2016. Archived from the original on May 11, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
52. ^ “Reliable Neural-Interface Technology (RE-NET)”. DARPA. Archived from the original on July 26, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
53. ^ “STENTRODE First in Human Early Feasibility Study (SWITCH)”. ClinicalTrials.gov. April 4, 2019. Archived from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
54. ^ “Aufrüstung für den Krieg 4.0: Heer der Hacker im Dienst der Cyber-Abwehr” (in German). CHIP Online. Archived from the original on 9 April 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
55. ^ Arkhangelskaya, Svetlana (21 December 2015). “Cyborg rats will take on drug dealers and terrorists”. Russia Beyond The Headlines. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
56. ^ Adams, Sam (4 January 2016). “Bomb-detecting RATS could replace sniffer dogs in battle against terrorists”. Mirror. Archived from the original on 20 June 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
57. ^ Crilly, Rob (2016-07-05). “Engineers develop cyborg locusts to sniff out explosives”. The Telegraph. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
58. ^ Whang, Oliver (24 May 2023). “Brain Implants Allow Paralyzed Man to Walk Using His Thoughts”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2023-07-26.
59. ^ Lorach, Henri; Galvez, Andrea; Spagnolo, Valeria; Martel, Felix; Karakas, Serpil; Intering, Nadine; Vat, Molywan; Faivre, Olivier; Harte, Cathal; Komi, Salif; Ravier, Jimmy; Collin, Thibault; Coquoz, Laure; Sakr, Icare; Baaklini, Edeny; Hernandez-Charpak, Sergio Daniel; Dumont, Gregory; Buschman, Rik; Buse, Nicholas; Denison, Tim; van Nes, Ilse; Asboth, Leonie; Watrin, Anne; Struber, Lucas; Sauter-Starace, Fabien; Langar, Lilia; Auboiroux, Vincent; Carda, Stefano; Chabardes, Stephan; Aksenova, Tetiana; Demesmaeker, Robin; Charvet, Guillaume; Bloch, Jocelyne; Courtine, Grégoire (1 June 2023). “Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface”. Nature. 618 (7963): 126–133. Bibcode:2023Natur.618..126L. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5. PMC 10232367. PMID 37225984.
60. ^ Moan, Charles E.; Heath, Robert G. (1972). “Septal stimulation for the initiation of heterosexual behavior in a homosexual male”. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 3: 23–30. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(72)90029-8.
61. ^ Orenstein, David. “People with paralysis control robotic arms using brain–computer interface”. Brown University. Archived from the original on 17 January 2021. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
62. ^ Oxley, Thomas J.; et al. (2021). “Motor neuroprosthesis implanted with neurointerventional surgery improves capacity for activities of daily living tasks in severe paralysis: first in-human experience”. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 13 (2). Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery: 102–108. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016862. PMC 7848062. PMID 33115813. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
63. ^ Burn, D. J.; Tröster, AI (2004). “Neuropsychiatric Complications of Medical and Surgical Therapies for Parkinson’s Disease”. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology. 17 (3): 172–80. doi:10.1177/0891988704267466. PMID 15312281. S2CID 441486.
64. ^ “Science and Technology Law: Neural Implants and Their Legal Implications | Solo, Small Firm and General Practice Division”. www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on 2017-02-28. Retrieved 2017-02-27.
65. ^ Solon, Olivia (15 February 2017). “Elon Musk says humans must become cyborgs to stay relevant. Is he right?”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
66. ^ Putnam, Hilary (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–21. ISBN 978-0511625398.
67. ^ Pringle, David (2014). Science Fiction: The 100 Best Novels. Orion. ISBN 978-0947761110. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 16 February 2016.

Recommended HashTags

• #neuro
• #psychology
• #motivation
• #medicine
• #heart
• #brainpower
• #memory
• #anxiety
• #braininjury
• #life
• #neurosurgery
• #anatomy
• #doctor
• #instagram
• #wellness
• #education
• #mindset
• #stroke
• #brainfood
• #medical